Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-7
Is It Good to Be Bad? A Longitudinal Analysis of Adolescent Popularity Motivations as a Predictor of Engagement in Relational Aggression and Risk Behaviors
We examined the impact of adolescents’ popularity motivations on their involvement in relational aggression perpetration and victimization, heavy drinking, and antiauthority behavior, while also considering the role of teens’ perception of their own popularity and psychosocial adjustment. High school students (N = 986; 50% female; Mage = 14.98 years) completed a battery of self-report questionnaires survey in the fall and again, 6 months later. Regression analysis controlling for Time 1 scores confirmed that stronger motivations to achieve or maintain popularity predicted increases in relational aggression perpetration and victimization, and antiauthority behavior. Furthermore, self-reported popularity predicted increases in heavy drinking, but only when popularity motivations were high. Finally, more frequent heavy drinking predicted increases in self-reported popularity over time. Findings emphasize the potential value of addressing adolescents’ popularity motivations in attempts at reducing the aforementioned negative behaviors and associated risks.
AikenL.WestS.RenoR. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
AllenJ. P.PorterM. R.McFarlandF. C.MarshP.McElhaneyK. B. (2005). The two faces of adolescents’ success with peers: Adolescent popularity, social adaptation, and deviant behavior. Child Development, 76, 747-760.
3.
CillessenA. H. (2008). Sociometric methods. In RubinK. H.BukowskiW. M.LarusenB. (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 82-99). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
4.
CillessenA. H.MayeuxL. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147-163.
5.
CillessenA. H.MayeuxL.HaT.de BruynE. H.LaFontanaK. M. (2014). Aggressive effects of prioritizing popularity in early adolescence. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 204-213.
6.
ColemanL.CaterS. (2005). Underage “binge” drinking: A qualitative study into motivations and outcomes. Drugs: Education, Prevention, and Policy, 12, 125-136.
7.
CrickN. R.GrotpeterJ. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710-722.
8.
CrickN. R.OstrovJ. M.BurrJ. E.Cullerton-SenC.Jansen-YehE.RalstonP. (2006). A longitudinal study of relational and physical aggression in preschool. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27, 254-268.
9.
CrickN. R.OstrovJ. M.WernerN. E. (2006). A longitudinal study of relational aggression, physical aggression, and children’s social–psychological adjustment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 127-138.
10.
DawesM.XieH. (2014). The role of popularity goal in early adolescents’ behaviors and popularity status. Developmental Psychology, 50, 489-497.
11.
de BruynE. H.CillessenA. H. (2006). Popularity in early adolescence: Prosocial and antisocial subtypes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 607-627.
12.
DiegoM. A.FieldT. M.SandersC. E. (2003). Academic performance, popularity, and depression predict adolescent substance use. Adolescence, 38(149), 35-42.
13.
DijkstraJ. K.LindenbergS.VerhulstF. C.OrmelJ.VeenstraR. (2009). The relation between popularity and aggressive, destructive, and norm-breaking behaviors: Moderating effects of athletic abilities, physical attractiveness, and prosociality. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19, 401-413.
14.
EllisW. E.WolfeD. A. (2009). Understanding the association between maltreatment history and adolescent risk behavior by examining popularity motivations and peer group control. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(9), 1253-1263.
15.
FarisR.FelmleeD. (2014). Casualties of social combat school networks of peer victimization and their consequences. American Sociological Review, 79, 228-257.
16.
FarmerT. W.RodkinP. C. (1996). Antisocial and prosocial correlates of classroom social positions: The social network centrality perspective. Social Development, 5, 174-188.
17.
GoodallJ. (1982). Order without law. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 5, 353-360.
18.
GrahamJ. W.OlchowskiA. E.GilreathT. D. (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8, 206-213.
19.
HarterS. (1988). Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for Adolescents. Denver, CO: University of Denver.
20.
HawleyP. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19, 97-132.
21.
HawleyP. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 279-309.
22.
HawleyP. H.LittleT. D.CardN. A. (2008). The myth of the alpha male: A new look at dominance-related beliefs and behaviors among adolescent males and females. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 76-88.
23.
HelmsS. W.Choukas-BradleyS.WidmanL.GilettaM.CohenG. L.PrinsteinM. J. (2014). Adolescents misperceive and are influenced by high-status peers’ health risk, deviant, and adaptive behavior. Developmental Psychology, 50, 2697-2714.
24.
HilbeJ. M. (2011). Negative binomial regression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
HoggM. A. (2005). The social identity perspective. In WheelanS. A. (Ed.), The handbook of group research and practice (pp. 133-157). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
27.
LaFontanaK. M.CillessenA. H. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19, 130-147.
28.
LuddenA. (2012). Social goals, social status, and problem behavior among low-achieving and high-achieving adolescents from rural schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 27(7), 1-19.
29.
MayeuxL.SandstromM. J.CillessenA. H. (2008). Is being popular a risky proposition?Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18, 49-74.
30.
McKayM. T.ColeJ. C. (2012). The relationship between alcohol use and peer pressure susceptibility, peer popularity and general conformity in northern Irish school children. Drugs: Education, Prevention, and Policy, 19, 213-222.
31.
MoffittT. E. (1993). The neuropsychology of conduct disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 135-151.
32.
MoralesJ.CrickN. (1998). Self-Report of Aggression and Social Behavior Measure (Unpublished measure). University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis.
33.
MorenoM. A.BrinerL. R.WilliamsA.WalkerL.ChristakisD. A. (2009). Real use or “real cool”: Adolescents speak out about displayed alcohol references on social networking websites. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, 420-422.
34.
OlweusD. (1989). Bully/victim questionnaire for students. Bergen, Norway: Department of Psychology, University of Bergen.
35.
ParkhurstJ. T.HopmeyerA. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity two distinct dimensions of peer status. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125-144.
36.
PearsonM.SweetingH.WestP.YoungR.GordonJ.TurnerK. (2006). Adolescent substance use in different social and peer contexts: A social network analysis. Drugs: Education, Prevention, and Policy, 13, 519-536.
37.
PreacherK. J.CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437-448.
38.
PrinsteinM. J.CillessenA. H. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 310-342.
39.
PronkR. E.Zimmer-GembeckM. J. (2010). It’s “mean,” but what does it mean to adolescents? Relational aggression described by victims, aggressors, and their peers. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25, 175-204.
40.
RoseA. J.SwensonL. P.CarlsonW. (2004). Friendships of aggressive youth: Considering the influences of being disliked and of being perceived as popular. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 25-45.
41.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
RubinD. B. (2004). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
43.
RubinD. B.LittleR. J. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
44.
SalmivalliC. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112-120.
45.
SantorD. A.MesserveyD.KusumakarV. (2000). Measuring peer pressure, popularity, and conformity in adolescent boys and girls: Predicting school performance, sexual attitudes, and substance abuse. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 163-182.
46.
ShivelyC. (1985). The evolution of dominance hierarchies in nonhuman primate society. In EllysonS. L.DovidioJ. F. (Eds.), Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 67-87). New York, NY: Springer.
47.
ShoulbergE. K.SijtsemaJ. J.Murray-CloseD. (2011). The association between valuing popularity and relational aggression: The moderating effects of actual popularity and physiological reactivity to exclusion. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 20-37.
48.
SPSS Inc. (2013). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM.
49.
TarrantM. (2002). Adolescent peer groups and social identity. Social Development, 11, 110-123.
50.
van Den BroekN.DeutzM. H.SchoneveldE. A.BurkW. J.CillessenA. H. (2016). Behavioral correlates of prioritizing popularity in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 2444-2454.
51.
VeenstraR.LindenbergS.ZijlstraB. J.De WinterA. F.VerhulstF. C.OrmelJ. (2007). The dyadic nature of bullying and victimization: Testing a dual-perspective theory. Child Development, 78, 1843-1854.
52.
VernbergE. M.JacobsA. K.HershbergerS. L. (1999). Peer victimization and attitudes about violence during early adolescence. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 28, 386-395.
53.
WestB. T.WelchK. B.GaleckiA. T. (2014). Linear mixed models: A practical guide using statistical software. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
54.
WursterT.XieH. (2014). Aggressive and prosocial behaviors: The social success of bistrategic preadolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38, 367-377.
