Differences in Study Motivation Within and Between Genders: An Examination by Gender Typicality Among Early Adolescents

Abstract

Despite boys’ educational underachievement, gender differences in study motivation have received little research attention. Guided by self-determination theory and the identity-based motivation model, this study investigates differences in study motivation between boys and girls, as well as within each gender. To adequately consider these within-gender differences, we investigate gender and gender typicality interactions in a sample of 6,380 Flemish seventh graders collected in 2012-2013. Results from multilevel analyses show that, in line with the educational gender gap, girls display higher levels of autonomous motivation. Furthermore, gender-typical girls score highest on autonomous motivation. Gender-typical boys score considerably lower, though they outperform self-perceived atypical boys and girls. In controlled motivation, no differences are observed between boys and girls of equal ability. Nevertheless, higher scores on gender typicality contribute to a higher sense of controlled motivation. The results are discussed in light of well-being, the need for autonomy, and gendered expectations of teachers.

Keywords

education gender motivation quantitative methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Assor

Kaplan

Kanat-Maymon

Roth

(2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15, 397-413.

Beaman

Wheldall

Kemp

(2006). Differential teacher attention to boys and girls in the classroom. Educational Review, 58, 339-366. doi:10.1080/00131910600748406

Benjamin

(2003). Gender and special educational needs. In Skelton

Francis

(Eds.), Boys and girls in the primary classroom (pp. 98-112). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.

Black

A. E.

Deci

E. L.

(2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740-756.

Blakemore

J. E. O.

(2003). Children’s beliefs about violating gender norms: Boys shouldn’t look like girls, and girls shouldn’t act like boys. Sex Roles, 48, 411-419.

Boone

Van Houtte

(2012). Social inequalities in educational choice at the transition from primary to secondary education: A matter of rational calculation? Kultura i Edukacja\Culture & Education, 91, 188-214.

Buchmann

DiPrete

T. A.

McDaniel

(2008). Gender inequalities in education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 319-337. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134719

Carver

P. R.

Yunger

J. L.

Perry

D. G.

(2003). Gender identity and adjustment in middle childhood. Sex Roles, 49, 95-109. doi:10.1023/A:1024423012063

Central Institute for Test Development. (2010). Toets begrijpend lezen groep 8 [Test comprehensive reading for 6th grade]. Arnhem, the Netherlands: CITO.

10.

Consuegra

Halimi

Engels

(2015). Gendered classroom interactions: Equal behavior leading to different feedback. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association in April, Chicago, IL.

11.

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.

12.

Deci

E. L.

Vallerand

R. J.

Pelletier

L. G.

Ryan

R. M.

(1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26, 325-346.

13.

Derks

Vermeersch

(2001). Gender en schools presteren: Een multilevel-analyse naar de oorzaken van de grotere schoolachterstand van jongens in het Vlaams secundair onderwijs [Gender and school performance: A multi-level analysis into the causes of boys’ greater school delay in secondary education in Flanders] (Vol. 26). Brussels, Belgium: Ministry of the Flemish Community, Education Department, TOR.

14.

Duckworth

A. L.

Seligman

M. E. P.

(2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 198-208. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.198

15.

Dudal

(2003). Oriënteringstest wiskunde 6 [Orientation test in mathematics for 6th grade]. Brussel, Belgium: VCLB Service.

16.

Egan

S. K.

Perry

D. G.

(2001). Gender identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for psychosocial adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 37, 451-463. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.37.4.451

17.

Elmore

K. C.

Oyserman

(2012). If “we” can succeed, “I” can too: Identity-based motivation and gender in the classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 176-185. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.003

18.

Epstein

(1998). Real boys don’t work: “Underachievement,” masculinity and the harassment of “sissies.” In Epstein

Elwood

Hey

Maw

(Eds.), Failing boys? Issues in gender and achievement (pp. 96-108). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

19.

Epstein

Elwood

Hey

Maw

(1998). Schoolboy frictions: Feminism and “failing” boys. In Epstein

Elwood

Hey

Maw

(Eds.), Failing boys? Issues in gender and achievement (pp. 3-18). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

20.

Fergusson

D. M.

Horwood

L. J.

(1997). Gender differences in educational achievement in a New Zealand birth cohort. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 32, 83-96.

21.

Francis

(2000). Boys, girls and achievement: Addressing the classroom issues. London, England: Routledge.

22.

Galambos

N. L.

Almeida

D. M.

Petersen

A. C.

(1990). Masculinity, femininity, and sex role attitudes in early adolescence: Exploring gender intensification. Child Development, 61, 1905-1914.

23.

Good

J. J.

Sanchez

D. T.

(2010). Doing gender for different reasons: Why gender conformity positively and negatively predicts self-esteem. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 203-214.

24.

Greene

B. A.

Miller

R. B.

Crowson

H. M.

Duke

B. L.

Akey

K. L.

(2004). Predicting high school students’ cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 462-482. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.006

25.

Haerens

Kirk

Cardon

De Bourdeaudhuij

Vansteenkiste

(2010). Motivational profiles for secondary school physical education and its relationship to the adoption of a physically active lifestyle among university students. European Physical Education Review, 16, 117-139.

26.

Hattie

(2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, England: Routledge.

27.

Horn

S. S.

(2007). Adolescents’ acceptance of same-sex peers based on sexual orientation and gender expression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 363-371. doi:10.1007/s10964-006-9111-0

28.

Hox

(2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. East Sussex, UK: Routledge.

29.

Jackson

(2003). Motives for “laddishness” at school: Fear of failure and fear of the “feminine.” British Educational Research Journal, 29, 583-598. doi:10.1080/0141192032000099388

30.

Jones

Myhill

(2004). “Troublesome boys” and “compliant girls”: Gender identity and perceptions of achievement and underachievement. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25, 547-561. doi:10.1080/0142569042000252044

31.

Keyes

C. L. M.

Shmotkin

Ryff

C. D.

(2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007-1022. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007

32.

Klimstra

T. A.

Hale Iii

W. W.

Raaijmakers

Q. A. W.

Branje

S. J. T.

Meeus

W. H. J.

(2009). Maturation of personality in adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 898-912.

33.

Leaper

Brown

C. S.

(2014). Sexism in Schools. In Liben

L. S.

Bigler

R. S.

(Eds.), The role of gender in educational contexts and outcomes (Vol. 47, pp. 189-223). London, England: Elsevier.

34.

Leaper

Farkas

Brown

C. S.

(2012). Adolescent girls’ experiences and gender-related beliefs in relation to their motivation in math/science and English. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 268-282. doi:10.1007/s10964-011-9693-z

35.

Leaper

Van

S. R.

(2008). Masculinity ideology, covert sexism, and perceived gender typicality in relation to young men’s academic motivation and choices in college. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 9, 139-153. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.9.3.139

36.

Legate

Ryan

R. M.

Weinstein

(2012). Is coming out always a “good thing”? Exploring the relations of autonomy support, outness, and wellness for lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 3, 145-152.

37.

Mac an Ghaill

(1994). The making of men: Masculinities, sexualities and schooling. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

38.

Marsh

H. W.

Martin

A. J.

Cheng

J. H. S.

(2008). A multilevel perspective on gender in classroom motivation and climate: Potential benefits of male teachers for boys? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 78-95.

39.

Marsh

H. W.

Myers

(1986). Masculinity, femininity and androgyny: A methodological and theoretical critique. Sex Roles, 14, 397-430. doi:10.1007/bf00288424

40.

Meece

J. L.

Glienke

B. B.

Burg

(2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 351-373. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.004

41.

Oyserman

Bybee

Terry

(2006). Possible selves and academic outcomes: How and when possible selves impel action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 188-204. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.188

42.

Oyserman

Destin

(2010). Identity-based motivation: Implications for intervention. The Counseling Psychologist, 38, 1001-1043. doi:10.1177/0011000010374775

43.

Oyserman

Kemmelmeier

Fryberg

Brosh

Hart-Johnson

(2003). Racial-ethnic self-schemas. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 333-347.

44.

Patterson

M. M.

Pahlke

(2011). Student characteristics associated with girls’ success in a single-sex school. Sex Roles, 65, 737-750. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9904-1

45.

Perry

D. G.

Pauletti

R. E.

(2011). Gender and adolescent development. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 61-74. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00715.x

46.

Pintrich

P. R.

De Groot

E. V.

(1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33

47.

Programme for International Student Assessment. (2009). Equally prepared for life? How 15-year-old boys and girls perform in school. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.

48.

Reeve

(2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44, 159-175.

49.

Ryan

R. M.

Connell

J. P.

(1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749-761.

50.

Ryan

R. M.

Deci

E. L.

(2013). Facilitating development, motivation, performance and wellness: An overview of self-determination theory. Paper presented at the International Conference on Self-Determination Theory in June, Rochester, NY.

51.

Saxvik

S. K.

Joireman

(2005). Sensation seeking, felt gender compatibility and psychosocial adjustment in women. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1505-1515.

52.

Spence

J. T.

(1984). Gender identity and its implications for the concepts of masculinity and femininity. In Sonderegger

(Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 32, pp. 59-95). New York, NY: Springer.

53.

Stoudt

B. G.

(2006). “You’re either in or you’re out” school violence, peer discipline, and the (re) production of hegemonic masculinity. Men and Masculinities, 8, 273-287.

54.

Swain

(2005). Masculinities in education. In Kimmel

Hearn

Connell

R. W.

(Eds.), Handbook of studies on men and masculinities (pp. 213-229). London, England: Sage.

55.

Tobin

D. D.

Menon

Spatta

B. C.

Hodges

E. V. E.

Perry

D. G.

(2010). The intrapsychics of gender: A model of self-socialization. Psychological Review, 117, 601-622. doi:10.1037/a0018936

56.

Toomey

R. B.

McGuire

J. K.

Russell

S. T.

(2012). Heteronormativity, school climates, and perceived safety for gender nonconforming peers. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 187-196.

57.

Uysal

Lin

H. L.

Knee

C. R.

(2010). The role of need satisfaction in self-concealment and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 187-199.

58.

Vallerand

R. J.

Fortier

M. S.

Guay

(1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1161-1176.

59.

Van Houtte

(2007). Exploring teacher trust in technical/vocational secondary schools: Male teachers’ preference for girls. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 826-839. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.03.001

60.

Van Houtte

Demanet

Stevens

P. A. J.

(2012). Self-esteem of academic and vocational students: Does within-school tracking sharpen the difference? Acta Sociologica, 55, 73-89. doi:10.1177/0001699311431595

61.

Van Landeghem

Goos

Van Damme

(2010). Vroege schoolverlaters in Vlaanderen. Evolutie van de ongekwalificeerde uitstroom tot 2007 [School drop-out in Flanders. Evolution of unqualified drop-out until 2007]. Steunpunt SSL-rapport SSL/OD1/2009.25, retrieved from http://steunpuntssl.be/Publicaties/Publicaties_docs/ssl-2012.01-1-2-0-vroege-schoolverlaters-in-vlaanderen-tot-2010.

62.

Vansteenkiste

Lens

De Witte

Deci

E. L.

(2004). The “why” and “why not” of job search behaviour: Their relation to searching, unemployment experience, and well-being. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 345-363.

63.

Vansteenkiste

Sierens

Soenens

Luyckx

Lens

(2009). Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 671-688.

64.

Vantieghem

Vermeersch

Van Houtte

(2014). Transcending the gender dichotomy in educational gender gap research: The association between gender identity and academic self-efficacy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 369-378. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.10.001

65.

Walker

C. O.

Greene

B. A.

Mansell

R. A.

(2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.004

66.

Warrington

Younger

Williams

(2000). Student attitudes, image and the gender gap. British Educational Research Journal, 26, 393-407. doi:10.1080/01411920050030914

67.

Weinstein

Ryan

W. S.

DeHaan

C. R.

Przybylski

A. K.

Legate

Ryan

R. M.

(2012). Parental autonomy support and discrepancies between implicit and explicit sexual identities: Dynamics of self-acceptance and defense. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 815-832. doi:10.1037/a0026854

68.

Wentzel

K. R.

(1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 202-209.

69.

West

Zimmerman

D. H.

(1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125-151. doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002

70.

Yunger

J. L.

Carver

P. R.

Perry

D. G.

(2004). Does gender identity influence children’s psychological well-being? Developmental Psychology, 40, 572-582. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.4.572

71.

Yusuf

(2011). The impact of self-efficacy, achievement motivation, and self-regulated learning strategies on students’ academic achievement. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2623-2626.