Community contexts are important ecological settings related to problem behavior and positive youth development (PYD). While substantial work has focused on neighborhood disadvantage, the current study explores the role of community assets, specifically linkages to important institutional resources and people in those settings. These concepts are explored in a cross-sectional sample of African American and White, male and female adolescent offenders with an eye toward approaches to reducing further delinquency. The findings of confirmatory factor and path analyses demonstrate that personal relationships and linkages to important community resources including recreational, school, faith-based, extended-family, and work-related sources, are related not only to better family functioning but also to positive peer relations and indirectly to youth self-reliance. This study highlights the potential role of community networks and support in the lives of youthful offenders and their families, a population in need of more research identifying potential positive pathways of development.
ArthurM. W.HawkinsJ. D.PollardJ. A.CatalanoR. F.BaglioniA. J.Jr. (2002). Measuring risk and protective factors for substance use, delinquency, and other adolescent problem behaviors. Evaluation Review, 26, 575-601.
2.
AttarB. K.GuerraN. G.TolanP. H. (1994). Neighborhood disadvantage, stressful life events, and adjustment in urban elementary-school children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 23, 391-400.
3.
BarreraM.ChassinL.RogoschF. (1993). Effects of social support and conflict on adolescent children of alcoholic and nonalcoholic fathers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 602-612. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.602
4.
BeaverK.PaulJ.DeLisiM.VaughnM. (2008). Desistance from delinquency: The marriage effect revisited and extended. Social Science Research, 37, 736.
5.
BensonP. L.ScalesP. C.HamiltonS. F.SesmaA.Jr. (2006). Positive youth development: Theory, research and application. In LernerR. W. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 894-941). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
6.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structuralmodels. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
7.
BoykinA. W. (1986). The triple quandary and the schooling of Afro-American children. In NeisserU. (Ed.), The school achievement of minority children (pp. 57-92). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
BrodyG. H.GeX.CongerR. D.GibbonsF. X.MurryV. B.GerrardM.SimonsR. L. (2001). The influence of neighborhood disadvantage, collective socialization, and parenting on African American children’s affiliation with deviant peers. Child Development, 72, 1231-1246.
9.
BronfenbrennerU. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723-742.
10.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
11.
BurtonL. M.JarrettR. L. (2000). In the mix, yet on the margins: The place of families in urban neighborhood and child development research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1114-1135.
12.
BurtonL. M.Price-SpratlenT.SpencerM. (1997). On ways of thinking about and measuring neighborhoods: Implications for studying context and developmental outcomes for children. In DuncanG.Brooks-GunnJ.AberL. (Eds.), Neighborhood poverty: Context and consequences for children (Vol. II, pp. 132-144). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
13.
ByrneB. M. (1989). A primer of LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
14.
BynesH.MillerB. (2012). The relationship between neighborhood characteristics and effective parenting behaviors: The role of social support. Journal of Family Issues, 33, 1658-1687.
15.
CantillonD. (2006). Community social organization, parents, and peers as mediators of perceived neighborhood block characteristics on delinquent and prosocial activities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 111-127.
16.
Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1992). Young adolescents: Risk and opportunity. In A matter of time: Risk and opportunity in the nonschool hours (pp. 25-39). New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
17.
CatalanoR. F.HawkinsJ. D.BerglundM. L.PollardJ. A.ArthurM. W. (2002). Prevention science and positive youth development: Competitive or cooperative frameworks?Journal of Adolescent Health, 31, 230-239.
18.
CeballoR.McLoydV. C. (2002). Social support and parenting in poor, dangerous neighborhoods. Child Development, 73, 1310-1321. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00473
19.
ColemanJ. S. (1987). Families and schools. Educational Researcher, 16(6), 32-38.
20.
DarityW.NicholsonM. J. (2005). Racial wealth inequality and the black family. In McLoydV.HillN.DodgeK. (Eds.), African American family life: Ecological and cultural diversity (pp. 78-85). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
21.
DishionT. J.PattersonG. R.StoolmillerM.SkinnerM. L. (1991). Family school, and behavioral antecedents to early adolescent involvement with antisocial peers. Developmental Psychology, 27(1), 172-180.
22.
DodgeK.DishionT.LansfordJ. (Eds.). (2006). Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: Problems and solutions (pp. 1-462). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
23.
DurlakJ.WeissbergR. (2007). The impact of after-school programs that promote personal and social skills. Chicago, IL: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.
24.
EcclesJ. S.GootmanJ. A. (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
25.
ElliottD. S.HuizingaD.AgetonS. S. (1989). Explaining delinquency and drug abuse. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
26.
ElliottD. S.MenardS.RankinB.ElliottA.WilsonW. J.HuizingaD. (2006). Good kids from bad neighborhoods: Successful development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
27.
FurstenbergF. (1993). How families manage risk and opportunity in dangerous neighborhoods. In WilsonW. J. (Ed.), Sociology and the public agenda (pp. 231-258). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
28.
GonzalesN. A.CauceA. M.FriedmanR. J.MasonC. A. (1996). Family, peer, and neighborhood influence on academic achievement among African American adolescents: One year prospective effects. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 365-387.
29.
Gorman-SmithD.TolanP. H.HenryD. B. (2000). A developmental-ecological model of the relation of family functioning to patterns of delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16(2), 169-198.
30.
GottfredsonD. C.GerstenblithS. A.SouléD. A.WomerS. C.LuS. (2004). Do after school programs reduce delinquency?Prevention Science, 5, 253-266.
31.
GottliebB. (1985). Social networks and social support: An overview of research, practice, and policy implications. Health Education Quarterly, 12(1), 5.
32.
HartmanA. (1995). Diagrammatic assessment of family relationships. Families in Society, 76, 111-122.
33.
HirschiT. (1971). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
34.
HudleyC.TaylorA. (2006). What is cultural competence and how can it be incorporated into preventive interventions? In GuerraN.SmithE. P. (Eds.), Preventing youth violence in a multicultural society (pp. 249-269). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
35.
HynesK.SmithE. P.PerkinsD. (2009). Piloting a classroom-based intervention in after-school programmes: a case study in science migration. Journal of Children’s Services, 4(3), 4-20.
36.
JarrettR. (1995). Growing up poor: The family experiences of socially mobile youth in low-income African American neighborhoods. Journal of Adolescent Research, 10(1), 111-135.
37.
KretzmannJ. R.McKnightJ. L. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a community’s assets. Evanston, IL: Institute for Policy Research.
38.
LaFromboiseT. D.LowK. G. (1998). American Indian children and adolescents. In TaylorJ.. (Eds.), Children of color: Psychological interventions with culturally diverse youth (pp. 112-142). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
39.
LambornS. D.NguyenD. T. (2004). African American adolescents’ perceptions of family interactions: Kinship support, parent-child relationships, and teen adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 547-558.
40.
LarsonR. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55, 170-183.
41.
LeiP.WuQ. (2007). Introduction to structural equations modelings: Issues and practical considerations. ITEMS: Instructional Topics in Educational Measurement. Madison, WI: National Council on Measurement in Education.
42.
LernerR. M.LernerJ. V.AlmerigiJ. B.TheokasC.PhelpsE.GestdottirS.vonE. A. (2005). Positive youth development, participation in community youth development programs, and community contributions of fifth-grade adolescents: Findings from the first wave of the 4-H study on positive youth development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 17-71.
43.
LeventhalT.Brooks-GunnJ. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residences on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 309-337.
44.
LoeberR.DrinkwaterM.YinY.AndersonS. J.SchmidtL. C.CrawfordA. (2000). Stability of family interactions from ages 6 to 18. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 353-369.
45.
MahoneyJ. L.HarrisA. L.EcclesJ. S. (2006). Organized activity participation, positive youth development, and the over-scheduled hypothesis. Society for Research on Child Development: Social Policy Report: Giving Child and Youth Development Knowledge Away, 20, 3-25.
46.
MillerB. C.BoydD. R.ThomasD. L. (1982). On methods of studying marriages and families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 851-873.
47.
OsgoodD. W.AndersonA. L.ShafferJ. N. (2005). Unstructured leisure in the after-school hours. In MahoneyJ.LarsonR.EcclesJ. (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs (pp. 45-64). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48.
OsgoodD. W.WilsonJ. K.O’MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G.JohnstonL. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61, 635-655.
49.
PattersonG. R.DeBarysheB. D.RamseyE. (1989). A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. American Psychologist, 2, 329-335.
50.
PeeplesF.LoeberR. (1994). Do individual factors and neighborhood context explain ethnic differences in juvenile delinquency?Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10(2), 141.
51.
PettsR. (2009). Family and religious characteristics’ influence on delinquency trajectories from adolescence to young adulthood. American Sociological Review, 74, 465.
52.
ReidJ. B.PattersonG. R.SnyderJ. (2002). Antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: A developmental analysis and model for intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10468-000
53.
ReynoldsC. R.KamphausC. R. (1992). Behavior assessment system for children (BASC). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
54.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1993). Crime and deviance over the life course: The salience of adult social bonds. American Sociological Review, 55, 609-627.
55.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.Gannon-RowleyT. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443-478.
56.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-924.
57.
SarasonS. B. (1976). Community psychology, networks, and Mr. everyman. American Psychologist, 31, 317-328.
58.
SimonsR. L.SimonsL. G.BurtC. H.BrodyG. H.CutronaC. (2005). Collective efficacy, authoritative parenting and delinquency: A longitudinal test of a model integrating community- and family-level processes. Criminology, 43, 989-1029. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2005.00031
59.
SizerM. A. (2000). The social ecology of juvenile delinquency: A study of multiple spheres of influence (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Carolina, Columbia.
60.
SkinnerH. A.SteinhauerP. D.KamphausC. R. (1995). Family assessment measure III (FAM III). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
61.
SmithE. P.AtkinsJ.ConnellC. M. (2003). Family, school, and community factors and relationships to racial-ethnic attitudes and academic achievement. American Journal of Community Psychology, 32(1/2), 159-172.
62.
SmithE. P.PrinzR. J.DumasJ. E.LaughlinJ. (2001). Latent models of family processes in African American families: Relationships to child competence, achievement, and problem behavior. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 967-980.
63.
SmithE. P.RichardsonJ.BelueR. J. (2009). Homicide and violence among African American youth: From epidemic to endemic? In BraithwaiteR. L.TaylorS. E.TreadwellH. (Eds.), Health issues in the Black community (3rd ed., pp. 133-155). San Fransico, CA: Jossey-Bass.
64.
SmithE.P.WolfA. M.CantillonD.ThomasO.DavidsonW. S. (2004). The Adolescent Diversion Project: 25 years of Research on an Ecological Intervention. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 27, 2, 29-47.
65.
SnyderH. N.SickmundM. (2006). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
66.
StackC. (1974). All our kin. New York, NY: Basic Books.
67.
TaylorR. D. (1996). Adolescents’ perceptions of kinship support and family management practices: Association with adolescent adjustment in African American families. Developmental Psychology, 34, 687-695.
68.
TolanP. H.Gorman-SmithD.HuessmannL. R.ZelliA. (1997). Assessment of family relationship characteristics: A measure to explain risk for antisocial behavior and depression among urban youth. Psychological Assessment, 9, 212-223.
69.
WarrenJ.GelbA.HorowitzJ.RiordanJ. (2008). One in 100: Behind bars in America 2008. Washington, DC: The Pew Charitable Trusts.
70.
WilsonM. (1989). Child development in the context of the Black extended family. American Psychologist, 44, 380-385.
71.
ZaffJ. F.MooreK. A.PapilloA. R.WilliamsS. (2003). Implications of extracurricular activity participation during adolescence on positive outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 18, 599-630.
