This article explores girls’ learning about issues of femininity that takes place in the presence of others online, connected through chat rooms, instant messaging, and role-playing games. Informed by critical and poststructuralist feminist theorizing of gendered subjectivity, agency, and power, the article draws from qualitative interviews with 16 girls in Vancouver, Canada. Girls reported that online activities allowed them to rehearse different ways of being before trying them out offline, where they might have been reined in for going against perceived expectations for their gender. The article shows that girls enjoyed playing with gender and being gender rebellious. They practiced taking more initiative in heterosexual relationships than is currently authorized in prevailing rules of romance. Without necessarily challenging the underlying gendered power inequalities, some battled back in cyberspace against sexual harassment. In the conclusion, the authors reflect on the implications for girls’ individual and collective empowerment and for transformative pedagogy.
Addison, J., & Comstock, M. (1998). Virtually out: The emergence of a lesbian, bisexual, and gay youth cyberculture. In J. Austin & M. N. Willard (Eds.), Generations of youth: Youth cultures and history in 20th-century America (pp. 367-378). New York: New York University Press.
2.
Bassett, C. (1997). Virtually gendered: Life in an online world. In K. Gelder & S. Thornton (Eds.), The subcultures reader (pp. 537-550). London: Routledge.
3.
Best, S., & Kellner, D. (2003). Contemporary youth and the postmodern adventure. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 25, 75-93.
4.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
6.
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. New York: Routledge.
7.
Christie, A. A. (1997). Using e-mail within a classroom based on feminist pedagogy. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(2), 146-176.
8.
Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
Connell, R. W. (2002). Gender. Cambridge, UK/Malden, MA: Polity.
10.
Connell, R. W. (2004). Encounters with structure. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17(1), 11-28.
11.
Currie, D. H., & Kelly, D. M. (in press). “I’m going to crush you like a bug”: Understanding girls’ agency and empowerment. In Y. Jiwaniet al. (Eds.), Girlhood: Redefining the limits. Montreal, Canada: Black Rose.
12.
Currie, D. H., Kelly, D. M., & Pomerantz, S. (2005). “The geeks shall inherit the earth”: Girls’ agency, subjectivity, and empowerment. Manuscript submitted for publication.
13.
Davies, B. (1993). Shards of glass: Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
DeBell, M., & Chapman, C. (2003). Computer and Internet use by children and adolescents in 2001 (NCES 2004-014). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
16.
Dillabough, J.-A. (2004). Class, culture, and the “predicaments of masculine domination”: Encountering Pierre Bourdieu. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(4), 489-506.
17.
Duncan, N. (2004). It’s important to be nice, but it’s nicer to be important: Girls, popularity and sexual competition. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society, and Learning, 4(2), 137-152.
18.
Facer, K., Sutherland, R., Furlong, R., & Furlong, J. (2001). What’s the point of using computers?New Media and Society, 3(2), 199-219.
19.
Francis, B. (1997). Power plays: Children’s constructions of gender and power in role plays. Gender & Education, 9(2), 179-191. Retrieved October 25, 2004, from Academic Search Premier.
20.
Fraser, N. (1992). Sex, lies, and the public sphere: Some reflections on the confirmation of Clarence Thomas. Critical Inquiry, 18, 595-612.
21.
Hodkinson, P. (2002). Goth: Identity, style, and subculture. Oxford, UK: Berg.
22.
Holland, D. C., Lachicotte, W., Jr., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Holloway, S. L., Valentine, G., & Bingham, N. (2000). Institutionalizing technologies: Masculinities, femininities, and the heterosexual economy of the IT classroom. Environment and Planning: A, 32(4), 617-633.
24.
Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently: Free association, narrative and the interview method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Jenson, J., de Castell, S., & Bryson, M. (2003). “Girl talk”: Gender, equity, and identity discourses in a school-based computer culture. Women’s Studies International Forum, 26(6), 561-573.
26.
Jones, A. (1993). Becoming a “girl”: Poststructuralist suggestions for educational research. Gender and Education, 5(2), 157-166.
27.
Kelly, D. M., Pomerantz, S., & Currie, D. (2005). Skater girlhood and emphasized femininity: “You can’t land an ollie properly in heels.”Gender and Education, 17(3), 129-148.
28.
Kendall, L. (2002). Hanging out in the virtual pub: Masculinities and relationships online. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
Kenway, J. (1997). Backlash in cyberspace: Why “girls need modems.” In L. Roman & L. Eyre (Eds.), Dangerous territories: Struggles for difference and equality in education (pp. 255-279). New York: Routledge.
30.
Kolko, B. E. (1999). Representing bodies in virtual space: The rhetoric of avatar design. Information Society, 15, 177-186.
31.
Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
Merten, D. E. (1996). Going-with: The role of social form in early romance. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 24(4), 462-484.
33.
Nelson, L. (1999). Bodies (and spaces) do matter: The limits of performativity. Gender, Place and Culture, 6(4), 331-353.
34.
Paechter, C. (2002). Masculinities and femininities as communities of practice. Women’s Studies International Forum, 26(1), 69-77.
35.
Paechter, C. (2003). Learning masculinities and femininities: Power/knowledge and legitimate peripheral participation. Women’s Studies International Forum, 26(6), 541-552.
36.
Pomerantz, S., Currie, D. H., & Kelly, D. M. (2004). Sk8er girls: Skateboarders, girlhood, and feminism in motion. Women’s Studies International Forum, 27, 547-557.
37.
Reid-Walsh, J., & Mitchell, C. (2004). Girls’ Web sites: A virtual “room of one’s own”? In A. Harris (Ed.), All about the girl: Culture, power, and identity (pp. 173-182). New York: Routledge.
38.
Roberts, L. D., & Parks, M. R. (1999). The social geography of gender-switching in virtual environments on the Internet. Information, Communications, and Society, 2(4), 521-540.
39.
Rodino, M. (1997). Breaking out of binaries: Reconceptualizing gender and its relationship to language in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(3).
40.
Schiano, D. J. (1999). Lessons from LambdaMOO: A social, text-based virtual environment. Presence, 8(2), 127-189.
41.
Shaw, G. (2004, November 30). Messaging beats the mall: Internet has revolutionized teen socializing. Vancouver Sun, pp. A1-A2.
42.
Smith, D. E. (1988). Femininity as discourse. In L. G. Roman & L. K. Christian-Smith (Eds.), Becoming feminine: The politics of popular culture (pp. 37-59). London: Falmer.
43.
Statistics Canada. (2004). Census at school. Retrieved November 14, 2004, from http://www19.statcan.ca/05/05_000_e.htm
44.
St. Pierre, E. A., & Pillow, W. S. (Eds.). (2000). Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education. New York: Routledge.
45.
Thorne, B. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
46.
Valentine, G., & Holloway, S. L. (2002). Cyberkids? Exploring children’s identities and social networks in online and offline worlds. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(2), 302-319.
47.
Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. New York: Basil Blackwell.
48.
Wikipedia. (2004). Role-playing game. Retrieved November 17, 2004, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Role-playing_game
49.
Yates, S. J. (1997). Gender, identity, and CMC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 281-290.
