This study examines the distribution differences across sexes in key measures of self-control theory and differences in a causal model. Using cross-sectional data from juveniles (n = 1,500), the study shows mean-level differences in many of the self-control, risky behavior, and delinquency measures. Structural equation modeling findings support Gottfredson and Hirschi’s causal model for males and females. However, multiple-groups structural equation modeling findings support the theory that differences in the measures and causal model are present for both sexes.
Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47-87.
2.
Agnew, R. (1995). Testing the leading crime theories: An alternative strategy focusing on motivational processes. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 363-398.
3.
Arneklev, B. J., Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., & Bursik, R. J. (1993). Low self-control and imprudent behavior. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 225-247.
4.
Avakame, E. F. (1998). Intergenerational transmission of violence, self-control, and conjugal violence: A comparative analysis of physical violence and psychological aggression. Violence and Victims, 13, 301-316.
5.
Berger, R. (1989). Female delinquency in the emancipation era: A review of the literature. Sex Roles, 21, 375-399.
6.
Bichler-Robertson, G., Potchak, M. C., & Tibbetts, S. (2003). Low self-control, opportunity, and strain in students’ reported cheating behavior. Journal of Crime and Justice, 26, 23-53.
7.
Bottcher, J. (2001). Social practices of gender: How gender relates to delinquency in the everyday lives of high-risk youths. Criminology, 39, 893-932.
8.
Britt, C. L., Costello, B. J., Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (1999, November). Causes of delinquency II: A full replication. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Toronto, Canada.
9.
Broidy, L., & Agnew, R. (1997). Gender and crime: A general strain theory perspective. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 275-306.
10.
Burton, V. S., Cullen, F. T., Evans, T. D., Alarid, L. F., & Dunaway, R. G. (1998). Gender, self-control, and crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35, 123-147.
11.
Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Campbell, A. (1990). On the invisibility of the female delinquent peer group. Women and Criminal Justice, 2, 41-62.
13.
Chapple, C. L. (1999). Testing the boundaries: Dating violence and general theory of crime. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60 (04), 1337A. (UMI No. 9927518)
14.
Chesney-Lind, M. (1997). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Cochran, J. K., Wood, P. B., Sellers, C., Wilkerson, W., & Chamlin, M. B. (1998). Academic dishonesty and low self-control: An empirical test of a general theory of crime. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 227-255.
16.
Cohn, E. G., & Farrington, D. P. (1999). Changes in the most-cited scholars in 20 criminology and criminal justice journals between 1990 and 1995. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 345-359.
17.
Daly, K.,& Chesney-Lind, M. (1988). Feminism and criminology. Justice Quarterly, 5, 497-538.
18.
Evans, T. D., Cullen, F. T., Burton, V. S., Dunaway, R. G., & Benson, B. L. (1997). The social consequences of self-control: Testing the general theory of crime. Criminology, 35, 475-501.
19.
Forde, D., & Kennedy, L. W. (1997). Risky lifestyles, routine activities, and the general theory of crime. Justice Quarterly, 14, 265-294.
20.
Gibbs, J. J., & Giever, D. M. (1995). Self-control and its manifestations among university students: An empirical test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Justice Quarterly, 12, 231-255.
21.
Gibbs, J. J., Giever, D. M., & Higgins, G. E. (2003). A test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory using structural equation modeling. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 441-458.
22.
Gibbs, J. J., Giever, D. M., & Martin, J. (1998). Parental-management and self-control: An empirical test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35, 42-72.
23.
Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). General theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24.
Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (2003). Self-control and opportunity. In C. Britt & M. Gottfredson (Eds.), Control theories of crime and delinquency (pp. 5-21). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
25.
Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research on Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5-29.
26.
Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
Hickman, M., & Piquero, A. R. (2001). Exploring the relationship between gender, control balance, and deviance. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 323-351.
28.
Higgins, G. E. (2004). Gender and self-control theory: Are there differences in the measures and theory’s causal model?Criminal Justice Studies, 17, 33-56.
29.
Higgins, G. E., & Makin, D. A. (2004). Does social learning theory condition the effects of low self-control on college students’ software piracy?Journal of Economic Crime Management, 2, 1-22.
30.
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
Hope, T., Grasmick, H. G., & Pointon, L. J. (2003). The family in Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: Structure, parenting, and self-control. Sociological Focus, 36, 291-311.
32.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
33.
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1996a). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
34.
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1996b). PRELIS 2: User’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
35.
Keane, C., Maxim, P. S., & Teevan, J. J. (1993). Drinking and driving, self-control, and gender: Testing a general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 30-46.
36.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
37.
LaGrange, T. C., & Silverman, R. A. (1999). Low self-control and opportunity: Testing the general theory of crime as an explanation for gender differences in delinquency. Criminology, 37, 41-72.
38.
Longshore, D. (1998). Self-control and criminal opportunity: A prospective test of general theory of crime. Social Problems, 45, 102-113.
39.
Longshore, D., & Turner, S. (1998). Self-control in a criminal sample: An examination of construct validity. Criminology, 25, 81-98.
40.
Longshore, D., Turner, S., & Stein, J. A. (1996). Self-control in a criminal sample: An examination of construct validity. Criminology, 34, 209-228.
41.
Mazerolle, P., Burton, V. S., Cullen, F. T., Evans, T. D., & Payne, G. L. (2000). Strain, anger and delinquency adaptations: Specifying general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 89-101.
42.
Merton, R. (1957). On theoretical sociology. New York: Free Press.
43.
Miller, S. L., & Burack, C. (1993). A critique of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: Selective (in)attention to gender and power positions. Women and Criminal Justice, 4, 115-134.
44.
Miller, S. L., & Stark, R. (2002). Gender and religiousness: Can socialization explanations be saved?American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1399-1423.
45.
Mueller, R. O. (1995). Basic principles of structural equation modeling: An introduction to LISREL and EQS. New York/Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
46.
Mustaine, E. E., & Tewksbury, R. (1998). Predicting risks of larceny theft victimization: A routine activity analysis using refined activity measures. Criminology, 36, 829-858.
47.
Mustaine, E. E., & Tewksbury, R. (1999). Assessing the likelihood of drunk driving: Gender, context and lifestyle. Journal of Crime and Justice, 22, 57-93.
48.
Mustaine, E. E., & Tewksbury, R. (2000). Comparing the lifestyles of victims, offenders, and victim-offenders: A routine activity theory assessment of similarities and differences for criminal incident participants. Sociological Focus, 33, 339-362.
49.
Naffine, N. (1997). Feminism and criminology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
50.
Nakhaie, M., Silverman, R. A., & LaGrange, T. C. (2000). Self-control and social control: An examination of gender, ethnicity, class, and delinquency. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 25, 35-39.
51.
Osgood, D. W., Wilson, J. K., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61, 635-655.
52.
Paternoster, R., & Triplett, R. (1988). Disaggregating self-reported delinquency and its implications for theory. Criminology, 26, 591-615.
53.
Piquero, A. R., & Tibbetts, S. (1996). Specifying the direct and indirect effects of low self-control and situational factors in offenders’ decision-making: Toward a more complete model of rational offending. Justice Quarterly, 13, 481-510.
54.
Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931-964.
55.
Reckless, W. (1961). A new theory of delinquency and crime. Federal Probation, 25, 42-46.
56.
Reiss, A. J. (1951). Delinquency as the failure of personal and social controls. American Sociological Review, 16, 196-207.
57.
Schreck, C. J. (2002). How do social bonds restrain crime? A study of the mechanisms. Journal of Crime and Justice, 25, 1-21.
58.
Schreck, C. J., Wright, R. A., & Miller, J. M. (2002). A study of individual and situational antecedents of violent victimizations. Justice Quarterly, 19, 159-180.
59.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
60.
Sellers, C. (1999). Self-control and intimate violence: An examination of the scope and specification of the general theory of crime. Criminology, 37, 375-404.
61.
Smith, D., & Paternoster, R. (1987). The gender gap in theories of deviance: Issues and evidence. Criminology, 24, 140-172.
62.
Sutherland, E. (1949). White-collar crime. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
63.
Tibbetts, S. G. (1997). Gender differences in students’ rational decisions to cheat. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18, 393-414.
64.
Tibbetts, S. G., & Gibson, C. L. (2002). Individual propensities and rational decision-making: Recent findings and promising approaches. In A. R. Piquero& S. G. Tibbetts (Eds.), Rational choice and criminal behavior: Recent research and future challenges (pp. 3-24). New York: Routledge.
65.
Tibbetts, S. G., & Herz, D. C. (1996). Gender differences in factors of social control and rational choices. Deviant Behavior, 17, 183-208.
66.
Tibbetts, S. G., & Myers, D. L. (1999). Low self-control, rational choice, and student cheating. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 179-200.
67.
Tittle, C. R., Ward, D. R., & Grasmick, H. G. (2003). Gender, age, and crime/deviance: A challenge to self-control theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 426-453.
68.
Unnever, J. D., & Cornell, D. G. (2003). Bullying, self-control, and ADHD. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 129-147.
69.
Wilson, J. Q.,& Herrnstein, R. J. (1985). Crime and human nature. New York: Simon & Schuster.
70.
Winfree, L. T., & Bernat, F. P. (1998). Social learning, self-control, and substance abuse by eighth grade students: A tale of two cities. Journal of Drug Issues, 28, 539-558.
71.
Wood, P., Pfefferbaum, B., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Risk-taking and self-control: Social psychological correlates of delinquency. Journal of Crime and Justice, 16, 111-130.
