How should we analyze the dialogue over war and peace in the United States? If, as many studies hold, an important part of the debate is about justifying and rebutting justifications of martial policies, how do those attempts work in terms of argument types and strategies? Furthermore, what are those strategies, and how do they function to mobilize support for either side? Extant research on the details involved in such questions is surprisingly scant. To rectify this, the present work analyzes the dialogue and typologizes the arguments used by proponents and opponents by organizing them into categories. I deploy a discursive institutionalist methodology, combining new research on the arguments used by proponents of war with previous work on opposition to wars. The study provides a new understanding of the constituent arguments, norms, and typologies of recent political discussions concerning war and peace in the United States. In so doing, this article offers a new explanation of the dynamics of the debate as well as a thorough rendering of the positions participants take when supporting and opposing the use of armed force.
AddamsJane. 2003. “‘Peace and Bread in Time of War’ and ‘at the Beginning of the Great War.’” In Jane Addams’s Writings on Peace, edited by FischerM.WhippsJ., vol. 3, 1–25. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
2.
Anonymous. 1852. “The Crisis in Europe.” The United States Democratic Review30 (167): 401–25.
BacevichAndrew. 2009. The Limits of Power: The End of American Exceptionalism. New York: Henry Holt.
5.
BoutwellG.1900. War and Conquest Abroad, Degradation of Labor at Home. Chicago: Anti-Imperialist League.
6.
BrownPhillip Marshall. 1915. “The Dangers of Pacifism.” The North American Review201:59-67.
7.
BurrRichard. 2002. “Congressional Record: Authorization for Use of Military Force against Iraq Resolution of 2002.” H7316, House of Representatives, Washington, DC, October9.
8.
BushGeorge H. W.1991. “Address before a Joint Session of the Congress on the State of the Union.” January29. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=19253 (accessed June 26, 2017).
ChanSteveSafranWilliam. 2006. “Public Opinion as a Constraint against War: Democracies’ Response to Operation Democratic Freedom.” Foreign Policy Analysis2 (2): 137–56. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ (accessed May 10, 2017).
ChomskyNoam. 2002. The Umbrella of U.S. Power: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Contradictions of U.S. Policy. New York: Seven Stories Press.
14.
ChomskyNoam. 2004. Hegemony or Survival? America’s Quest for Global Domination. New York: Henry Holt.
15.
ChomskyNoam. 2007. Failed States: The Abuse of Power and the Assault on Democracy. New York: Henry Holt.
16.
ChomskyNoam. 2010. Hopes and Prospects. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
DavisTami R.Lynn-JonesSean M.1987. “City upon a Hill.” Foreign Policy66:20–38.
19.
D.D. B. 1847. “The Whigs and the War.” The American Whig Review6 (4): 331–47.
20.
DullesJohn Foster. 1954. “Address by Secretary Dulles Delivered to the Nation over Radio and Television, May 7, 1954, The Issues at Geneva.” Department of State Bulletin, May17. https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/pentagon/ps15.htm (accessed May 10, 2017).
ElmanMiriam F.2000. “Unpacking Democracy: Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Theories of Democratic Peace.” Security Studies9 (4): 91–126. doi:10.1080/09636410008429414.
24.
FulbrightJ. William. 1967. The Arrogance of Power. New York: Random House.
25.
GarrettGaret. 1953. The People’s Pottage. Caldwell: The Caxton Printers.
26.
GelpiChristopherFeaverPeterReiflerJason. 2009. Paying the Human Costs of War: American Public Opinion and Casualties in Military Conflicts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
HaassRichard N.2009. Wars of Choice: Wars of Necessity. New York: Simon & Schuster.
29.
HilfrichFabian. 2012. Debating American Exceptionalism: Empire and Democracy in the Wake of the Spanish-American War. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
HolstiOleRosenauJames. 1990. “The Structure of Foreign Policy Attitudes among American Leaders.” Journal of Politics52 (1): 94–125. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2131421 (accessed May 10, 2017).
31.
HooverHerbert. 1938. “Our New Foreign Policy: We Need to Keep Our Heads.” Council of Foreign Relations, Chicago, IL.
32.
House Report. 1812. “Report, or Manifesto, of the Causes and Reasons for War with Great Britain.” Presented to the House of Representatives by the Committee of Foreign Relations, A&G Way, Washington, DC, June 3.
33.
HuntMichael H.2009. Ideology and U.S. Foreign Policy. 2nd ed.New Haven: Yale University Press.
34.
HuntingtonSamuel P.1982. “American Ideals versus American Institutions.” Political Science Quarterly97 (1): 1–37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2149312 (accessed May 10, 2017).
35.
JohnsonChalmers. 2004. Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy and the End of the Republic. New York: Metropolitan Reprint.
MeadWalter Russell. 2003. Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the World. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
56.
NauHenry. 2016. “The US Foreign Policy Debate: Déjà Vu?” In US Foreign Policy and Global Standing in the 21st Century: Realities and Perceptions, edited by InbarE.RynholdJ., 27–40. London: Routledge.
PatmanRobert G.2006. “Globalisation, the New US Exceptionalism and the War on Terror.” Third World Quarterly27 (6): 963–86. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4017735 (accessed May 10, 2017).
63.
PaulRon.2007. “A Foreign Policy of Freedom.” Foundation for Rational Economics and Education, Lake Jackson, TX.
64.
PaulRon. 2013. Pursue the Cause of Liberty: A Farewell to Congress. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
65.
Pax Christi. 2002. “Security Achieved through Regional Disarmament, Not War—Pax Christi USA Statement on War against Iraq.” www.dupagepeacethroughjustice.org/pcusa1.html (accessed May 10, 2017).
RooseveltTheodore. n.d. The Works of Theodore Roosevelt: Presidential Addresses and State Papers: Part 5. The Strenuous Life. New York: P.F. Collier & Son.
72.
RubensteinRichard E.2010. Reasons to Kill: Why Americans Choose War. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
73.
ScanlonSandra. 2013. The Pro-war Movement: Domestic Support for the Vietnam War and the Making of Modern American Conservatism. New York: Routledge.
SchmidtVivian. 2010. “Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth ‘New Institutionalism.’” European Political Science Review2 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1017/S175577390999021XP.
76.
SchroederJohn H.1973. Mr. Polk’s War: American Opposition and Dissent, 1846–1848. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
77.
SchuesslerJohn M.2015. Deceit on the Road to War: Presidents, Politics, and American Democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
78.
SchwartzShalom H.1992. “Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology25 (1): 1–65.
79.
SchwartzShalom H.1994. “Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values?” Journal of Social Issues50 (4): 19–45.
80.
SchwartzShalom H.CapraraGian VittorioVecchioneMichele. 2010. “Basic Personal Values, Core Political Values, and Voting: A Longitudinal Analysis.” Political Psychology31 (3): 421–52.
