Recent scholarship on left-behind places shows how uneven spatial development produces affective consequences. Yet discontent and resentment are often treated as near-automatic responses to economic marginalization, obscuring the diversity of left-behind places and their varied emotional and political outcomes. This article argues that left-behindness is temporally constituted: to understand how it is experienced, interpreted, and politicized, we must analyze how places are left behind in time. To do so, the article develops a multi-layered timescape framework linking a macro timescape of global capitalist restructuring, a meso timescape of local change agency, and a micro biographical timescape of lived experience. Interactions across these layers—through timing, sequence, duration, and tempo—shape how left-behindness becomes narratable, meaningful, and contested. Empirically, the article analyzes Northeast China as a case of left-behindness, identifying a distinctive pattern of belated cultural representation and quasi-politicization crystallizing in the city of Shenyang.
AgbiboaDE (2019) The manipulations of time: On the temporal embeddedness of urban insecurity. Urban Studies56(4): 836–851.
4.
AutorDHDornDHansonGH (2016) The China shock: Learning from labor-market adjustment to large changes in trade. Annual Review of Economics8(1): 205–240.
5.
BækkelundNG (2021) Change agency and reproductive agency in the course of industrial path evolution. Regional Studies55(4): 757–768.
6.
BennerMTripplMHassinkR (2024) Sustainable and inclusive development in left-behind places. Review of Regional Research44(3): 237–249.
7.
BergerSMussoSWickeC (2022) The unmaking of industrial landscapes: The north-western Italian industrial triangle and the Ruhr region in Germany. In: BergerSMussoSWickeC (eds) Deindustrialisation in Twentieth-Century Europe: The Northwest of Italy and the Ruhr Region in Comparison. Palgrave Macmillan, pp.1–38.
BiddauFD’OriaEBrondiS (2023) Coping with territorial stigma and devalued identities: How do social representations of an environmentally degraded place affect identity and agency?Sustainability15(3): 2686.
10.
BoltonMDayRLeachM (2019) England’s overlooked neighbourhoods: Defining, understanding and regenerating ‘left behind’ communities. Journal of Urban Regeneration & Renewal13(2): 116–123.
11.
CapocciaGKelemenRD (2007) The study of critical junctures: Theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism. World Politics59(3): 341–369.
12.
ChienSWoodworthMD (2018) China’s urban speed machine: The politics of speed and time in a period of rapid urban growth. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research42(4): 723–737.
13.
ChuHHassinkR (2023) Advancing spatial ontology in evolutionary economic geography. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society16(3): 391–404.
14.
ChungJHLaiHJooJ-H (2009) Assessing the ‘Revive the Northeast’ (zhenxing dongbei) programme: Origins, policies and implementation. China Quarterly197: 108–125.
15.
CoaseRWangN (2012) How China Became Capitalist. Palgrave Macmillan US.
16.
ConnorDSBergAKKemenyT, et al. (2024) Who gets left behind by left behind places?Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society17(1): 37–58.
17.
CPC Shenyang Municipal Committee Party History Research Office and CPC Shenyang Tiexi District Committee (2013) Shenyang Tiexi Old Industrial Zone Adjustment and Transformation of 30 Years. Wanjuan Publisher. [In Chinese].
18.
CramerKJ (2016) The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. University of Chicago Press.
19.
CresswellT (2014) Place: An Introduction. John Wiley & Sons.
20.
DattaA (2017) Introduction: Fast cities in the urban age. In: DattaAShabanA (eds) Mega-Urbanization in the Global South. Routledge, pp.13–40.
21.
DavenportAZarankoB (2020) Levelling Up: Where and How. Institute for Fiscal Studies.
22.
De RuyterAMartinRTylerP (2021) Geographies of discontent: Sources, manifestations and consequences. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society14: 381–393.
23.
Díaz-LanchasJSojkaADi PietroF (2021) Of losers and laggards: The interplay of material conditions and individual perceptions in the shaping of EU discontent. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society14(3): 395–415.
24.
DijkstraLPoelmanHRodríguez-PoseA (2020) The geography of EU discontent. Regional Studies54(6): 737–753.
25.
EatonS (2016) The Advance of the State in Contemporary China: State-Market Relations in the Reform Era. Cambridge University Press.
ElderGHJr (1974) Children of the Great Depression. University of Chicago Press.
28.
EssletzbichlerJDisslbacherFMoserM (2018) The victims of neoliberal globalisation and the rise of the populist vote: A comparative analysis of three recent electoral decisions. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society11(1): 73–94.
29.
EyMShervalM (2016) Exploring the minescape: Engaging with the complexity of the extractive sector. Area48(2): 176–182.
30.
FanXDaiS (2017) Spatial–temporal distribution characteristics of industrial heritage protection and the influencing factors in a Chinese city: A case study of the Tiexi old industrial district in Shenyang. Journal of Heritage Tourism12(3): 281–295.
31.
FischerBMeissnerDBoschmaR, et al. (2024) Global value chains and regional systems of innovation: Towards a critical juncture?Technological Forecasting and Social Change201: 123245.
32.
FloridaR (2017) The New Urban Crisis. Basic Books.
33.
FordRGoodwinM (2014) Understanding UKIP: Identity, social change and the left behind. The Political Quarterly85(3): 277–284.
34.
FurlongJ (2019) The changing electoral geography of England and Wales: Varieties of ‘left-behindedness’. Political Geography75: 102061.
35.
GordonIR (2018) In what sense left behind by globalisation? Looking for a less reductionist geography of the populist surge in Europe. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society11(1): 95–113.
36.
GörmarF (2024) Weaving a foundational narrative – Place-making and change in an old-industrial town in East Germany. European Planning Studies32(11): 2338–2359.
37.
GrillitschMSotarautaM (2020) Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography44(4): 704–723.
38.
HassinkRHuXShinDH, et al. (2018) The restructuring of old industrial areas in East Asia. Area Development and Policy3(2): 185–202.
39.
HenningM (2019) Time should tell (more): Evolutionary economic geography and the challenge of history. Regional Studies53(4): 602–613.
40.
HoEL-E (2021) Social geography I: Time and temporality. Progress in Human Geography45(6): 1668–1677.
41.
HochschildAR (2016) Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. The New Press.
42.
HsingY (2010) The Great Urban Transformation: Politics of Land and Property in China. Oxford University Press.
43.
HuX (2014) State-led path creation in China’s rustbelt: The case of Fuxin. Regional Studies Regional Science1(1): 294–300.
44.
HuXYangC (2019) Institutional change and divergent economic resilience: Path development of two resource-depleted cities in China. Urban Studies56(16): 3466–3485.
45.
JenningsWStokerG (2019) The divergent dynamics of cities and towns: Geographical polarisation and Brexit. The Political Quarterly90(S2): 155–166.
46.
KemenyTStorperM (2020) Superstar Cities and Left-Behind Places: Disruptive Innovation, Labor Demand, and Interregional Inequality. III Working Paper (41). International Inequalities Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science.
47.
KurikkaHKolehmainenJSotarautaM, et al. (2023) Regional opportunity spaces – Observations from Nordic regions. Regional Studies57(8): 1440–1452.
48.
LeeCK (2007) Against the Law: Labor Protests in China’s Rustbelt and Sunbelt. University of California Press.
49.
LefebvreH (2004) Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time and Everyday Life. Continuum.
LuXPerryEJ (eds) (1997) Danwei: The Changing Chinese Workplace in Historical and Comparative Perspective. M.E. Sharpe.
52.
McCannP (2024) Levelling up: The need for an institutionally coordinated approach to regional and national productivity. Regional Studies58(5): 1145–1156.
53.
MacKinnonDBéalVLeibertT (2024) Rethinking ‘left-behind’ places in a context of rising spatial inequalities and political discontent. Regional Studies58(6): 1161–1166.
54.
MacKinnonDDawleySPikeA, et al. (2019) Rethinking path creation: A geographical political economy approach. Economic Geography95(2): 113–135.
55.
MacKinnonDKemptonLO’BrienP, et al. (2022) Reframing urban and regional ‘development’ for ‘left behind’ places. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society15(1): 39–56.
56.
MahA (2012) Industrial Ruination, Community, and Place: Landscapes and Legacies of Urban Decline. University of Toronto Press.
57.
MannheimK (1952) The problem of generations. In: KecskemetiP (ed.) Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp.276–320.
58.
MartinRSunleyP (2006) Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography6(4): 395–437.
59.
MartinRSunleyP (2022) Making history matter more in evolutionary economic geography. ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography66(2): 65–80.
60.
MartinRGardinerBPikeA, et al. (2021) Levelling Up Left Behind Places: The Scale and Nature of the Economic and Policy Challenge. Routledge.
61.
MayJThriftN (2001) Timespace: Geographies of Temporality. Routledge.
62.
National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC) (2010) China Compendium of Statistics 1949–2008. China Statistics Press.
63.
National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC) (2016) China Statistical Yearbook 2015. China Statistics Press. [In Chinese].
64.
National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC) (2017) China Statistical Yearbook 2016. China Statistics Press. [In Chinese].
65.
NaughtonB (1995) Growing Out of the Plan: Chinese Economic Reform, 1978–1993. Cambridge University Press.
66.
NorrisPInglehartR (2019) Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge University Press.
67.
PacewiczJ (2024) From causality to constitution: Why good historical comparisons are the same as good ethnographic case studies, deep down. In: WilsonNHMayrlD (eds) After Positivism. Columbia University Press, pp.96–118.
68.
PainR (2019) Chronic urban trauma: The slow violence of housing dispossession. Urban Studies56(2): 385–400.
69.
PiersonP (2000) Not just what, but when: Timing and sequence in political processes. Studies in American Political Development14(1): 72–92.
70.
PiersonP (2003) Big, slow-moving, and…invisible: Macrosocial processes in the study of comparative politics. In: RueschemeyerDMahoneyJ (eds) Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press, pp.177–207.
71.
PikeABéalVCauchi-DuvalN, et al. (2024) ‘Left behind places’: A geographical etymology. Regional Studies58(6): 1167–1179.
72.
PredA (1984) Place as historically contingent process: Structuration and the time-geography of becoming places. Annals of the Association of American Geographers74(2): 279–297.
73.
Rodríguez-PoseA (2018) The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society11(1): 189–209.
74.
Rodríguez-PoseADijkstraLPoelmanH (2024) The geography of EU discontent and the regional development trap. Economic Geography100(3): 213–245.
75.
Rodríguez-PoseATerrero-DávilaJLeeN (2023) Left-behind versus unequal places: Interpersonal inequality, economic decline and the rise of populism in the USA and Europe. Journal of Economic Geography23(5): 951–977.
76.
RodrikD (2018) Populism and the economics of globalization. Journal of International Business Policy1: 12–33.
77.
RosaH (2013) Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. Columbia University Press.
78.
ScheiringGKingL (2023) Deindustrialization, social disintegration, and health: A neoclassical sociological approach. Theory and Society52(1): 145–178.
79.
SewellWH (2008) The temporalities of capitalism. Socio-Economic Review6(3): 517–537.
80.
Shenyang Daily (1997) The city held a press conference on the transfer of enterprise property rights, 192 small business property rights for sale to the society. 21November, p.1. [In Chinese].
81.
ShirkSL (1993) The Political Logic of Economic Reform in China. University of California Press.
SilvaJM (2013) Coming Up Short: Working-Class Adulthood in an Age of Uncertainty. Oxford University Press.
84.
SkocpolT (1985) Bring the state back in. In: EvansPRueschemeyerDSkocpolT (eds) Bringing the State Back in. Cambridge University Press, pp.3–37.
85.
SorensenA (2023) Taking critical junctures seriously: Theory and method for causal analysis of rapid institutional change. Planning Perspectives38(5): 929–947.
86.
StihlL (2024) Local culture and change agency in old industrial places: Spinning forward and digging deeper. European Planning Studies32(3): 586–606.
87.
SuM (2004) Tiexi District of Shenyang: A frontier of revitalizing northeast traditional industrial base. Land and Resources10: 4–15. [In Chinese].
88.
SwidlerA (1986) Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review51: 273–286.
89.
TernulloS (2024) How the Heartland Went Red: Why Local Forces Matter in an Age of Nationalized Politics. Princeton University Press.
90.
TianY (2007) The origin and formation of the “typical Danwei system”. Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition47(4): 56–62. [In Chinese].
91.
Trejo-NietoA (2025) Reconsidering development in left-behind places and a critical discussion of place-based strategies. Geografiska Annaler Series B: Human Geography107(4): 456–472.
92.
TroostAAJanssenHJHamMV (2023) Neighbourhood histories and educational attainment: The role of accumulation, duration, timing and sequencing of exposure to poverty. Urban Studies60(4): 655–672.
93.
TuanYF (1977) Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. University of Minnesota Press.
94.
TupsGSakalaENDannenbergP (2024) Hope and path development in ‘left-behind’ places – A Southern perspective. Regional Studies58(6): 1219–1236.
95.
WalleyCJ (2013) Exit Zero: Family and Class in Postindustrial Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
96.
XieW (2019) The industrial work-unit society in Northeast China and its transformation: A historical sociological examination. Open Times6: 25–44. [In Chinese].
97.
XieW (2024a) Life experience in transition: The dual temporality of social change in Northeast China. Sociological Studies2: 111–133. [In Chinese].
98.
XieW (2024b) Generations at the crossroads: Biographical experience and working-class politics in China. Labor History65(3): 337–351.
99.
XieW (2025) Intergenerational resonances of class: Transitional and class experience in “New Northeast Literature”. Society45(6): 41–67. [In Chinese].
100.
ZhangF (2004) Revitalization of the old industrial base in Northeast China and the missing modern cultural personality in the Northeast. Journal of Social Sciences6: 68–72. [In Chinese].
