This paper seeks to elucidate how the state steers the dynamics of land (de-)financialization and the transitional strategies within urban development, particularly in the context of the real estate crisis. An empirical analysis of 25 debt resolution cases involving urban investment corporations in China was conducted, utilizing Qualitative Comparative Analysis to identify the pathways and decision-making processes that lead to various transition outcomes. The study uncovers three primary strategies: direct bailouts, productivity-oriented restructuring, and financialization-oriented restructuring. Of these, only productivity-oriented restructuring offers a viable route toward sustainable development post-crisis. Furthermore, five distinct pathways emerge, each corresponding to different strategies and outcomes. Among these, only the “Vanguard Productivilization” pathway leads to de-financialization and sustainable urban development. In contrast, local governments, lacking explicit central government support for bailouts, often resort to supporting affiliated corporations through pathways such as “Local Safe-Net” and “Local Finexus,” or, in some cases, promote financialization among lower-rated corporations, characterized as “Re-financialization Gamblers.” These findings highlight the urgent need for policy interventions to regulate decentralized debt resolution processes and to expand productivity-oriented restructuring options for resource-constrained local governments and corporations, offering a pathway away from excessive reliance on land financialization.
AcharyaVVAnginerDWarburtonAJ (2016) The end of market discipline? Investor expectations of implicit government guarantees. Working Paper. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1961656 (accessed 9 September 2025).
4.
AmbroseBWDengYWuJ (2015) Understanding the risk of China’s local government debts and its linkage with property markets. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2557031 (accessed 9 September 2025).
5.
AshtonPDoussardMWeberR (2016) Reconstituting the state: City powers and exposures in Chicago’s infrastructure leases. Urban Studies53(7): 1384–1400.
6.
BanCBohleD (2021) Definancialization, financial repression, and policy continuity in east-Central Europe. Review of International Political Economy28(4): 874–897.
7.
BastidaFGuillamónMDBenitoB (2014) Explaining interest rates in local government borrowing. International Public Management Journal17(1): 45–73.
8.
BeckerGS (1968) Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy76(2): 169–217.
9.
BelottiEArbaciS (2021) From right to good, and to asset: The state-led financialisation of the social rented housing in Italy. Environment and Planning C Politics and Space39(2): 414–433.
10.
BeswickJPennyJ (2018) Demolishing the present to sell off the future? The emergence of financialized municipal entrepreneurialism in London. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research42(4): 612–632.
11.
CaiMFanJYeC, et al. (2021) Government debt, land financing and distributive justice in China. Urban Studies58(11): 2329–2347.
12.
CeruttiEClaessensSLaevenL (2017) The use and effectiveness of macroprudential policies: New evidence. Journal of Financial Stability28: 203–224.
13.
ChongBUHwangIDKimYS (2015) Credit ratings and short-term debt financing: An empirical analysis of listed firms in Korea. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies44(1): 88–128.
14.
ChristophersB (2019) Putting financialisation in its financial context: Transformations in local government-led urban development in post-financial crisis England. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers44: 571–586.
15.
FengYWuFZhangF (2022) Changing roles of the state in the financialization of urban development throughchengtouin China. Regional Studies56(8): 1259–1270.
16.
FengYWuFZhangF (2024) Building state centrality through state selective financialization: Reconfiguring the land Reserve System in China. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space56(3): 766–783.
17.
FieldsDUfferS (2016) The financialisation of rental housing: A comparative analysis of New York City and Berlin. Urban Studies53(7): 1486–1502.
18.
FieldsD (2018) Constructing a new asset class: Property-led financial accumulation after the crisis. Economic Geography94(2): 118–140.
19.
García-LamarcaM (2021) Real estate crisis resolution regimes and residential REITs: emerging socio-spatial impacts in Barcelona. Housing Studies36(9): 1407–1426.
20.
GothamKF (2009) Creating liquidity out of spatial fixity: The secondary circuit of capital and the subprime mortgage crisis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research33(2): 355–371.
21.
GotohF (2021) Social norms and (de-)financialization: Japan’s and China’s divergent paths in consumer credit. Contemporary Politics27(4): 397–418.
22.
HalbertLAttuyerK (2016) Introduction: The financialisation of urban production: Conditions, mediations and transformations. Urban Studies53(7): 1347–1361.
23.
HeSZhangMWeiZ (2020) The state project of crisis management: China’s Shantytown Redevelopment Schemes under state-led financialization. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space52(3): 632–653.
24.
HuangZDuX (2018) Holding the market under the stimulus plan: Local government financing vehicles’ land purchasing behavior in China. China Economic Review50: 85–100.
25.
LiJChiuLHR (2018) Urban investment and development corporations, new town development and China’s local state restructuring – The case of Songjiang new town, Shanghai. Urban Geography39(5): 687–705.
26.
LiZWuFZhangF (2024a) A geographical approach to China’s Local Government Debt. Professional Geographer76(3): 318–330.
27.
LiZWuFZhangF (2024b) The political economy of China’s local debt. China Quarterly257: 100–118.
28.
LiZWuFZhangF (2023) State de-financialisation through incorporating local government bonds in the budgetary process in China. Journal of Economic Geography23(5): 1169–1190.
29.
LinGCSZhangAY (2017) China’s metropolises in transformation: Neoliberalizing politics, land commodification, and uneven development in Beijing. Urban Geography38(5): 643–665.
30.
LiuCPengZ (2023) The realistic situation and theoretical analysis of urban spatial changes induced by “Debt-driven Urban Construction” in China. Urban Development Studies30(12): 74–87 (in Chinese).
31.
LiuLXLyuYYuF (2021) Local government implicit debt and the pricing of LGFV bonds. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=4075341 (accessed 9 September 2025).
32.
LivingstonMPoonWPHZhouL (2018) Are Chinese credit ratings relevant? A study of the Chinese bond market and credit rating industry. Journal of Banking & Finance87: 216–232.
33.
MaoWCaiSLuJ, et al. (2023) What triggered China’s urban debt risk? Snowball effect under the growth target constraint. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics67: 1–13.
34.
Medina-MolinaCPérez-MacíasNFernández-FernádezJL (2023) The use of micromobility in different contexts. An explanation through the multilevel perspective and QCA. Technological Forecasting and Social Change188: 122295.
35.
MianASufiA (2015) House of Debt: How They (and You) Caused the Great Recession, and How We Can Prevent It From Happening Again. University of Chicago Press.
36.
NethercoteM (2020) Build-to-rent and the financialization of rental housing: Future research directions. Housing Studies35(5): 839–874.
37.
NewmanK (2009) Post-industrial widgets: Capital flows and the production of the urban. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research33(2): 314–331.
38.
OsbandKFilosoVCapassoS (2024) The limits of limitless debt. Journal of Macroeconomics79: 103567.
39.
ÖzlemÇ (2023) The roles of the state in the financialisation of housing in Turkey. Housing Studies38(6): 1006–1026.
40.
PanFZhangFZhuS, et al. (2017) Developing by borrowing? Inter-jurisdictional competition, land finance and local debt accumulation in China. Urban Studies54(4): 897–916.
41.
PengCLuM (2019) Looking at governance from the new city: The city building boom and consequences under the short-term growth targets. Management World35(8): 44–57+190–191. (in Chinese).
42.
Ryan-CollinsJ (2021) Breaking the housing–finance cycle: Macroeconomic policy reforms for more affordable homes. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space53(3): 480–502.
43.
SáezL (2016) The political budget cycle and subnational debt expenditures in federations: Panel data evidence from India. Governance29(1): 47–65.
44.
SauvagnatJ (2015) Prosecution and leniency programs: The role of bluffing in opening investigations. Journal of Industrial Economics63(2): 313–338.
45.
SchoenbergerE (2004) The spatial fix revisited. Antipode36(3): 427–433.
46.
ShatkinG (2016) The real estate turn in policy and planning: Land monetization and the political economy of peri-urbanization in Asia. Cities53: 141–149.
47.
SironiA (2003) Testing for market discipline in the European banking industry: Evidence from subordinated debt issues. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking35(3): 443–472.
48.
StellingaB (2024) Housing financialization as a self-sustaining process. Political obstacles to the de-financialization of the Dutch housing market. Housing Studies39(4): 877–900.
49.
WalkerTZhangXZhangA, et al. (2021) Fact or fiction: Implicit government guarantees in China’s corporate bond market. Journal of International Money and Finance116: 102414.
50.
WalksACliffordB (2015) The political economy of mortgage securitization and the neoliberalization of housing policy in Canada. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space47(8): 1624–1642.
51.
WanRFanWWangX (2024) Local government financing vehicle restructuring, implicit government guarantees and debt financing costs: Evidence from the Chinese municipal corporate bond market. Economic Systems48(2): 101179.
52.
WangLShaYDingLZhaoZ (2024) Risk mitigation strategies in urban investment bonds: Insights from local government implicit debt governance. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics70: 607–618.
53.
WangJWuCZhangFX (2008) Liquidity, default, taxes, and yields on municipal bonds. Journal of Banking & Finance32(6): 1133–1149.
54.
WangLShaYDingL, et al. (2024) Risk mitigation strategies in urban investment bonds: Insights from local government implicit debt governance. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics70: 607–618.
55.
WardCSwyngedouwE (2018) Neoliberalisation from the ground up: Insurgent capital, regional struggle, and the assetisation of land. Antipode50(4): 1077–1097.
56.
WijburgG (2020) The de-financialization of housing: Towards a research agenda. Housing Studies36(8): 1–18.
57.
WijburgGAalbersMB (2017) The alternative financialization of the German housing market. Housing Studies32(7): 968–989.
58.
WongC (2025) Local government debt in China: The 2023 bailout and future prospects. China Journal93(1): 112–135.
59.
WuF (2022) Land financialisation and the financing of urban development in China. Land Use Policy112: 104412.
60.
WuFPanFChenJ (2022) Financialization under state entrepreneurialism in China. Regional Studies56(8): 1237–1243.
61.
YuMJiaJWangS (2022) Local officials’ promotion incentives and issuance of urban investment bonds. Research in International Business and Finance63: 101791.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
