The engagement of people in extremely low-wage work in major cities of the Global South and their withdrawal from labour-organising activities arise from several factors. Among these is the hegemonic meaning construction of work as ‘timepass’ or leisure and as an opportunity for sociality and neighbourliness that is central to the social reproduction of everyday life. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork in Delhi, this article examines how work regimes are marked by a ‘commission economy’, whereby various stakeholders in the chain of surplus accumulation demand a commission for their services. The possibility of undertaking informal economic activities is contingent on a host of improvisations that are founded upon discipline, violence and also solidarity. In this respect, various stakeholders possess what they refer to as a ‘setting’, which alludes to an active process of economic and non-economic relationship-building with both state and non-state agencies within both formal and informal arenas. To ‘do setting’ is a dynamic spatial process that draws on negotiations with the aim of shaping favourable relationships and outcomes in particular urban spaces. It entails the use of social and cultural resources, everyday political negotiations and extra-judicial solutions.
AgarwalaR (2008) Reshaping the social contract: Emerging relations between the state and informal labor in India. Theory and Society37(4): 375–408.
2.
BasoleA (2016) Informality and flexible specialization: Apprenticeships and knowledge spillovers in an Indian silk weaving cluster. Development and Change47(1): 157–187.
3.
BenjaminS (2014) Occupancy urbanism as political practice. In: ParnellSOldfieldS (eds) The Routledge Handbook on Cities of the Global South. Abingdon and New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 309–321.
4.
BhattacharyaS (2018) The afterlife of things in a Delhi Junkyard: Liminal debris of consumer culture. Economic and Political Weekly53(46): 45–51.
5.
BhuwaniaA (2017) Courting the People: Public Interest Litigation in Post-Emergency India. Delhi: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BremanJ (2013) At Work in the Informal Economy of India: A Perspective from the Bottom Up. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
7.
CarswellGDe NeveG (2013) Laboring for global markets: Conceptualising labour agency in global production networks. Geoforum44: 62–70.
8.
CastellsMPortesA (1989) World underneath: The origins, dynamics, and effects of the informal economy. In: PortesACastellsMBentonLA (eds) The Informal Economy: Studies in Advanced and Less Developed Countries. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 11–37.
9.
ChambersT (2020) Networks, Labour, and Migration among Indian Muslim Artisans. London: University College London Press.
10.
ChatterjeeP (2008) Democracy and economic transformation in India. Economic and Political Weekly43(16): 53–62.
11.
ChenM (2014) Informal employment and development: Patterns of inclusion and exclusion. The European Journal of Development Research26(4): 397–418.
12.
DasV (2015) Corruption and the possibility of life. Contributions to Indian Sociology49(3): 322–343.
13.
De NeveG (2008) ‘We are all sondukarar (relatives) !’: Kinship and its morality in an urban industry of Tamilnadu, South India. Modern Asian Studies42(1): 211–246.
14.
DemariaFSchindlerS (2016) Contesting urban metabolism: Struggles over waste-to-energy in Delhi, India. Antipode48(2): 293–313.
15.
FergusonSLeBaronGDimitrakakiA, et al. (2016) Introduction: Special issue on social reproduction. Historical Materialism24(2): 25–37.
16.
FernandezB (2018) Dispossession and the depletion of social reproduction. Antipode50(1): 142–163.
17.
FernandezL (1997) Beyond public spaces and private spheres: Gender, family, and working class politics in India. Feminist Studies23(3): 525–547.
18.
GidwaniVRamamurthyP (2018) Agrarian questions of labor in urban India: Middle migrants, translocal householding and the intersectional politics of social reproduction. The Journal of Peasant Studies45(5–6): 994–1017.
19.
GidwaniVReddyRN (2011) The afterlives of ‘waste’: Notes from India for a minor history of capitalist surplus. Antipode43(5): 1625–1658.
20.
GillK (2010) Of Poverty and Plastic: Scavenging and Scrap Trading Entrepreneurs in India’s Urban Informal Economy. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
21.
GooptuN (2001) The Politics of the Urban Poor in Early Twentieth-Century India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
GramsciA (2000) Hegemony, relations of force, historic bloc. In: ForgacsD (ed.) The Gramsci Reader: Selected Writings 1916–1935. New York, NY: New University Press, pp. 189–221, 190–202.
23.
HansenTB (2005) Violence in Urban India: Identity Politics, ‘Mumbai’, and the Postcolonial City. Delhi: Permanent Black.
24.
Harriss-WhiteB (2003) India Working: Essays on Society and Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Harriss-WhiteBGooptuN (2001) Mapping India’s world of unorganized labor. Socialist Register 2001: Working Classes, Global Realities37: 89–118.
26.
JeffreyC (2009) Fixing futures: Educated unemployment through a North Indian Lens. Comparative Study of Society and History51(1): 182–211.
27.
JeffreyC (2010a) Timepass: Youth, class, and time among unemployed young men in India. American Ethnologist37(3): 465–481.
28.
JeffreyC (2010b) Timepass: Youth, Class, and the Politics of Waiting in India. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
29.
KatzC (2001) Vagabond capitalism and the necessity of social reproduction. Antipode33(4): 709–728.
30.
LiTM (2009) To make live or let die? Rural dispossession and the protection of surplus populations. Antipode41(S1): 66–93.
31.
MasseyD (1994) Space, Place, and Gender. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
32.
MezzadriA (2017) The Sweatshop Regime: Laboring Bodies, Exploitation, and Garments Made in India. Delhi: Cambridge University Press.
33.
MezzadriASrivastavaR (2015) Labour regimes in the Indian garment sector: Capital-labour relations, social reproduction and labour standards in the National Capital Region (NCR). Report of the ESRC-DFID Research Project ‘Labour Standards and the Working Poor in China and India’. London: SOAS.
34.
MiesM (1981) Dynamics of sexual division of labour and capital accumulation: Women lace workers of Narsapur. Economic and Political Weekly16(10/12): 487–500.
35.
MosseD (2018) Caste and development: Contemporary perspectives on a structure of discrimination and advantage. World Development110: 422–436.
36.
RaiRBrownBRuwanpuraN (2019) SDG8: Decent work and economic growth: A gendered analysis. World Development113: 368–380.
37.
RajuS (2013) The material and the symbolic: Intersectionalities of home-based work in India. Economic and Political Weekly48(1): 60–68.
38.
RofelL (1992) Rethinking modernity: Space and factory discipline in China. Cultural Anthropology7(1): 93–114.
39.
RoitmanJ (2004) Productivity in the margins: The reconstitution of state power in the Chad Basin. In: DasVPooleD (eds) Anthropology in the Margins of the State. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 191–224.
40.
RoutrayS (2014a) Between eviction and existence: Urban restructuring and the politics of poverty in Delhi. PhD Thesis, University of British Columbia, Canada.
41.
RoutrayS (2014b) The postcolonial city and its displaced poor: Rethinking ‘political society’ in Delhi. International Journal or Urban and Regional Research38(6): 2292–2308.
42.
SalzingerL (2003) Genders in Production: Making Workers in Mexico’s Global Factories. Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
43.
SanyalK (2014) Rethinking Capitalist Development: Primitive Accumulation, Governmentality and Post-colonial Capitalism. New Delhi: Routledge.
44.
SchindlerS (2014) Producing and contesting the formal/informal divide: Regulating street hawking in Delhi, India. Urban Studies51(12): 2596–2612.
45.
Snell-RoodC (2015) No One Will Let Her Live: Women’s Struggle for Well-being in a Delhi Slum. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
46.
SrivastavaS (2012) Duplicity, intimacy, community: An ethnography of ID cards, permits, and other fake documents in Delhi. Thesis Eleven113(1): 78–93.
47.
Wilkinson-WeberC (2004) Women, work and the imagination of craft in South Asia. Contemporary South Asia13(3): 287–306.
48.
WindersJSmithBE (2018) Social reproduction and capitalist production: A genealogy of dominant imaginaries. Progress in Human Geography20(10): 1–19.
