This article looks into the new production dynamics and workspaces related to urban change by examining a rising group of workers: self-employed women who have started their own businesses or freelance activities from home or coworking spaces. This empirical study applies an intersectional approach to examine the job satisfaction and work–life balance of home-based workers according to employment status, gender and generation by means of a mixed-method approach, combining the statistical analysis of a dataset of 43,850 workers from the European Working Conditions Survey with in-depth interviews. The findings reveal that work intensity, working time quality and prospects depend more on an individual being self-employed than on being home-based; however, earnings and time devoted to care work are strongly shaped by working from home. Moreover, the profiles of home-based self-employed workers were completely different by gender and age. Although millennials (i.e. those born between 1980 and 1995) differ significantly from previous generations, gender inequality also prevails among the young. Combining working at home with coworking could be a solution to offset the lack of interactions and social capital of home-based entrepreneurs and to increase their earnings.
Albort-MorantGOghaziP (2016) How useful are incubators for new entrepreneurs?Journal of Business Research69: 2125–2129.
2.
AndreottiAAnselmiGEichhornT, et al. (2017) European Perspectives on Participation in the Sharing Economy. SSRN. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3046550 (accessed 26 February 2021).
3.
BainesS (2002) New technologies and old ways of working in the home of the self-employed teleworker. New Technology, Work and Employment17(2): 89–101.
4.
BerkeDL (2003) Coming home again: The challenges and rewards of home-based self-employment. Journal of Family Issues24(4): 513–546.
5.
BrownJ (2017) Curating the ‘third place’? Coworking and the mediation of creativity. Geoforum82: 112–126.
6.
BrushCGde BruinAWelterF (2009) A gender-aware framework for women’s entrepreneurship. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship1(1): 8–24.
7.
BrydgesTHracsBJ (2019) What motivates millennials? How intersectionality shapes the working lives of female entrepreneurs in Canada’s fashion industry. Gender, Place & Culture26(4): 510–532.
8.
DanielEMDi DomenicoMSharmaS (2015) Effectuation and home-based online business entrepreneurs. International Small Business Journal33(8): 799–823.
DavidsonNMInfrancaJ (2016) The sharing economy as an urban phenomenon. Yale Law & Policy Review34(2): 215.
11.
Di MarinoMLapintieK (2017) Emerging workplaces in post-functionalist cities. Journal of Urban Technology24(3): 5–25.
12.
DyAMMarlowSMartinL (2017) A web of opportunity or the same old story? Women digital entrepreneurs and intersectionality theory. Human Relations70(3): 286–311.
13.
EkinsmythC (2011) Challenging the boundaries of entrepreneurship: The spatialities and practices of UK ‘mumpreneurs’. Geoforum42: 104–114.
14.
EkinsmythC (2013) Managing the business of everyday life: The roles of space and place in ‘mumpreneurship’. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research19(5): 525–546.
15.
EkinsmythC (2014) Mothers’ business, work/life and the politics of ‘mumpreneurship’. Gender, Place & Culture21(10): 1230–1248.
16.
Eurofound (2017a) Exploring self-employment in the European Union. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
17.
Eurofound (2017b) Sixth European working conditions survey – overview report (2017update). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
18.
Eurofound (2018) European Working Conditions Survey Integrated Data File, 1991–2015. Data collection. 7th edn. UK Data Service. SN: 7363. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7363-7.
FelsteadAJewsonNWaltersS (2005) Changing Places of Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
FuziA (2015) Co-working spaces for promoting entrepreneurship in sparse regions: The case of South Wales. Regional Studies, Regional Science2(1): 462–469.
22.
GandiniA (2015) The rise of coworking spaces: A literature review. Ephemera15(1): 193–205.
23.
GarrettLESpreitzerGMBacevicePA (2017) Co-constructing a sense of community at work: The emergence of community in coworking spaces. Organization Studies38(6): 821–842.
24.
HattonE (2017) Mechanisms of invisibility: Rethinking the concept of invisible work. Work, Employment and Society31(2): 336–351.
25.
JainACourvisanosJ (2013) Home based business in suburban peripheral regions and government policy: A case study of Casey, Melbourne, Australia. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies19: 295–318.
26.
JayawarnaDRouseJMacphersonA (2014) Life course pathways to business start-up. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development26(3–4): 282–312.
27.
JonssonSLindbergh (2013) The development of social capital and financing of entrepreneurial firms: From financial bootstrapping to bank funding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice37(4): 661–686.
28.
KapasiIGallowayL (2015) Work–life balance in home-based businesses: A UK study. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation16(1): 33–42.
29.
KirkwoodJTootelB (2008) Is entrepreneurship the answer to achieving work–family balance?Journal of Management & Organization13(3): 285–302.
30.
Leclercq-VandelannoitteAIsaacH (2016) The new office: How coworking changes the work concept. Journal of Business Strategy37(6): 3–9.
31.
LiuJZhuYSerapioMG, et al. (2019) The new generation of millennial entrepreneurs: A review and call for research. International Business Review28(5): 101581.
32.
López-IgualPRodríguez-ModroñoP (2020) Who is teleworking and where from? Exploring the main determinants of telework in Europe. Sustainability12(21): 8797.
33.
LoscoccoKSmith-HunterA (2004) Women home-based business owners: Insights from comparative analyses. Women in Management Review19: 164–173.
34.
LoughlinCBarlingJ (2001) Young workers’ work values, attitudes, and behaviors. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology74: 543–558.
35.
MasonCMCarterSTaggS (2011) Invisible businesses: The characteristics of home-based businesses in the United Kingdom. Regional Studies45(5): 625–639.
36.
MasonCMReuschkeDSyrettS, et al. (eds) (2015) Entrepreneurship in Cities, Neighbourhoods, Households and Homes. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
37.
MeliouEEdwardsT (2018) Relational practices and reflexivity: Exploring the responses of women entrepreneurs to changing household dynamics. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship36(2): 149–168.
38.
MerkelJ (2015) Coworking in the city. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization15(1): 121–139.
39.
MoosMPfeifferDVinodraiT (eds) (2017) The Millennial City: Trends, Implications, and Prospects for Urban Planning and Policy. Abingdon: Routledge.
40.
PerronsD (2003) The new economy and the work–life balance: Conceptual explorations and a case study of new media. Gender, Work & Organization10(1): 65–93.
41.
PosterWRCrainMCherryMA (2016) Introduction: Conceptualizing invisible labor. In: CrainMPosterWCherryMA (eds) Invisible Labor: Hidden Work in the Contemporary World. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, pp. 3–27.
42.
PowellACraigL (2015) Gender differences in working at home and time use patterns: Evidence from Australia. Work, Employment and Society29(4): 571–589.
43.
ReuschkeD (2019) The subjective well-being of homeworkers across life domains. EPA: Economy and Space51(6): 1326–1349.
44.
ReuschkeDDomeckaM (2018) Policy brief on home-based businesses. OECD SME and Entrepreneurship Papers no. 11. Paris: OECD Publishing.
45.
ReuschkeDHoustonD (2016) The importance of housing and neighbourhood resources for urban microbusinesses. European Planning Studies24(6): 1216–1235.
46.
ReuschkeDMasonCSyrettS (2021) Digital futures of small businesses and entrepreneurial opportunity. Futures128: 102714.
47.
Rodríguez-ModroñoP (2019) Youth unemployment, NEETs and structural inequality in Spain. International Journal of Manpower40(3): 433–448.
48.
SimonJMcDonald WayM (2015) Working from home and the gender gap in earnings for self-employed US millennials. Gender in Management: An International Journal30(3): 206–224.
49.
SimonJKMcDonald WayM (2016) Why the gap? Determinants of self-employment earnings differentials for male and female millennials in the US. Journal of Family and Economic Issues37(2): 297–312.
50.
SullivanC (2000) Space and the intersection of work and family in homeworking households. Community, Work & Family3(2): 185–204.
51.
SullivanCLewisS (2001) Home-based telework, gender, and the synchronization of work and family: Perspectives of teleworkers and their co-residents. Gender, Work & Organization8(2): 123–145.
52.
SullivanCSmithsonJ (2007) Perspectives of homeworkers and their partners on working flexibility and gender equity. The International Journal of Human Resource Management18(3): 448–461.
53.
TaylorS (2015) A new mystique? Working for yourself in the neoliberal economy. The Sociological Review63(S1): 174–187.
54.
ThompsonPJones-EvansDKwongC (2009) Women and home-based entrepreneurship: Evidence from the United Kingdom. International Small Business Journal27(2): 227–239.
55.
VorleyTRodgersP (2014) Home is where the business is: Incidents in everyday life and the formation of home-based businesses. International Small Business Journal32(4): 428–448.
56.
WalkerEWebsterB (2004) Gender issues in home-based businesses. Women in Management Review19(8): 404–412.
57.
WalkerEWangCRedmondJ (2008) Women and work–life balance: Is home-based business ownership the solution?Equal Opportunities International27: 258–275.
58.
WarhurstCEikhofDRHaunschildA (2008) Work Less, Live More? Critical Analyses of the Work–Life Boundary. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
59.
Waters-LynchJPottsJ (2017) The social economy of coworking spaces: A focal point model of coordination. Review of Social Economy75(4): 417–433.
60.
WellingtonAJ (2006) Self-employment: The new solution for balancing family and career?Labour Economics13(3): 357–386.
61.
WilliamsCC (2005) The undeclared sector, self-employment and public policy. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research11(4): 244–257.
62.
WorthN (2016a) Feeling precarious: Millennial women and work. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space34(4): 601–616.
63.
WorthN (2016b) Who we are at work: Millennial women, everyday inequalities and insecure work. Gender, Place & Culture23(9): 1302–1314.
64.
YangSBGuyME (2006) GenXers versus boomers: Work motivators and management implications. Public Performance & Management Review29(3): 267–284.
