‘The kind of things we’ve heard keep people in the district’: White racial exclusion and the evolution of school choice policies in Portland Public Schools
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2019
‘The kind of things we’ve heard keep people in the district’: White racial exclusion and the evolution of school choice policies in Portland Public Schools
This policy history traces the evolution of Portland Public Schools’ school choice programme from the early 1970s until 2010 and examines its impacts on the historically black Albina neighbourhood. The purpose of this research is to identify the ideologies and assumptions that led to the establishment of the initial school choice programme and continued to influence decision makers as the programme evolved into a more neoliberal marketplace of schools. The district originally embraced controlled choice as a means to manage integration so it would not significantly tip the racial balance in predominantly white schools. By opting to make integration voluntary for students in predominantly white schools, the board legitimised white parents’ preferences for racially exclusionary school settings. In Portland Public Schools, white racial exclusion laid the foundation that shaped the technologies of the school choice programme as it developed into a more neoliberal iteration.
AggarwalU (2016) The ideological architecture of whiteness as property in educational policy. Educational Policy30(1): 128–152.
2.
AnyonJ (2014) Radical Possibilities: Public Policy, Urban Education and a New Social Movement. New York: Routledge.
3.
BallS (1993) Education markets, choice, and social class: The market as a class strategy in the UK and the USA. British Journal of Sociology of Education14(1): 3–19.
4.
BallSBoweRGerwirtzS (1995) Circuits of schooling: A sociological exploration of parental choice of school in social class contexts. The Sociological Review43(1): 52–78.
5.
BarmackJ (1993) 1993 enrollment analysis. Report, Portland Public Schools.
6.
BillinghamCKimelbergS (2013) Middle class parents, urban schooling and the shift from consumption to production of urban space. Sociological Forum28(1): 85–108.
7.
BrennerNTheodoreN (2002) Cities and the geographies of “actually existing neoliberalism”. Antipode34(3): 349–379.
8.
BurasK (2014) Race, charter schools, and conscious capitalism: On the spatial politics of whiteness as property (and the unconscionable assault on black New Orleans). Harvard Educational Review81(2): 296–330.
9.
BurasK (2015) Charter Schools, Race and Urban Space: Where the Market Meets Grassroots Resistance. New York: Routledge.
City Club of Portland (1980) Report on racial integration–desegregation issues in Portland Public Schools. Portland, OR: City Club of Portland.
12.
CobbCGlassG (2009) School choice in a post-desegregation world. Peabody Journal of Education84(2): 262–278.
13.
CollinsH (1977) No one rushes to back Jefferson busing plan. The Oregonian, 24July, p. D1.
14.
CollinsH (1978a) Busing to upper grades scatters Albina children. The Oregonian, 15November, p. B1.
15.
CollinsH (1978b) After ten years, integration still a problem at Wilson. The Oregonian, 18November, p. A8.
16.
CollinsH (1980a) Portland adopts new desegregation plan. The Oregonian, 16April, p. A1.
17.
CollinsH (1980b) Tubman success takes high toll on staff, students. The Oregonian, 28December, p. B1.
18.
DeSenaJ (2006) “What’s a mother to do?” Gentrification, school selection and the consequences for community cohesion. American Behavioral Scientist50(2): 241–257.
19.
DiRadoA (1997) School board averts minority boycott. The Oregonian, 9May, p. C1.
DurbinK (1985a) Portland Schools quietly moving to re-segregation. The Oregonian, 14April, p. C2.
22.
DurbinK (1985b) Humboldt points-up neighborhood school dilemma. The Oregonian, 14April, p. C3.
23.
EastmanNAndersonMBoylesD (2017) Choices or rights? Charter schools and the politics of choice-based education policy reform. Studies in the Philosophy of Education 36: 61–81.
24.
GibsonK (2007) Bleeding Albina: A history of community disinvestment 1940–2000. Transforming Anthropology15(1): 3–25.
25.
GravesB (1990) Desegregation efforts chalk up some successes. The Oregonian, 10June, p. C7.
26.
GravesBHernandezR (1997) Portland lets each school set cuts. The Oregonian, 12July, p. A1.
27.
HarrisC (1993) Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review106(8): 1707–1791.
28.
HarveyD (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
HohleR (2012) The color of neoliberalism: The “modern Southern businessman” and postwar Alabama’s challenge to racial desegregation. Sociological Forum27(1): 142–162.
JohnsonAW (2012) ‘Turnaround’ as shock therapy: Race, neoliberalism, and school reform. Urban Education48(2): 232–256.
32.
JohnsonEWilliamsF (2010) Desegregation and multiculturalism in the Portland Public Schools. Oregon Historical Quarterly111(1): 6–37.
33.
KellerB (1971) Board seeking a new plan for desegregation. The Oregonian, 14November, p. A1.
34.
Ladson-BillingsG (1998) Just what is Critical Race Theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education?International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education11(1): 7–24.
35.
LassiterM (2012) Schools and housing in metropolitan history: An introduction. Journal of Urban History38(2): 195–204.
36.
League of Women Voters (2011) Public school districts in the city of Portland: Equity, governance and process. Portland, OR: League of Women Voters of Portland Education Fund.
37.
LednicerL (2007) The fight for Jefferson. The Oregonian, 30August, p. B10.
LinnRLWellnerKG (eds) (2007) Race-conscious policies for assigning students to schools: Social science research and the Supreme Court cases. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.
40.
LipmanP (2011) The New Political Economy of Urban Education: Neoliberalism, Race, and the Right to the City. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.
41.
McPhersonE (2011) Moving from separate to equal, to equitable schooling: Revisiting desegregation policies. Urban Education46(3): 465–483.
42.
MasseyDDentonN (1993) American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of an Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
NeilsenS (2007) Choice under fire: Portland schools can win over parents, but not by force. The Oregonian, 6May, p. E1.
44.
New Horizons Fair Housing Task Force (1986) Fair housing strategy plan for the city of Portland. Portland, OR: New Horizons Fair Housing Task Force.
45.
Oregonian (1972) Quiet prevails over worrisome school desegregation Issue. 5March, p. A4.
46.
Oregonian (1978a) One-way desegregation prods mother to action. 12November, p. B6.
47.
Oregonian (1978b) White parents found program enriching for their children, themselves. 12November, p. B6.
OzgaJ (1987) Studying education through the lives of policy makers: An attempt to close the micro–macro gap. In: WalkerSBartonL (eds) Changing Policies, Changing Teachers: New Directions for Schooling?Milton Keynes: Open University Press, pp. 138–150.
50.
ParkerP (2004) School transfer rules faulted. The Oregonian, 3September, p. D1.
51.
ParkerPHammondB (2006) Magnet Schools’ pull also protection. The Oregonian, 19March, p. D1.
52.
ParkerPLearnS (2006) District hits brakes on transfers. The Oregonian, 8June, p. D1.
53.
Portland Public Schools (1970) October 1970 Enrollment Report.
54.
Portland Public Schools (1971) Minority group enrollment, 1971–2.
55.
Portland Public Schools (1980) 1980 Enrollment Report.
56.
Portland Public Schools (1990) Enrollment Report, October1990.
57.
Portland Public Schools (1998) Enrollment Report, October 1998.
58.
Portland Public Schools (2000) Enrollment Report, October 2000.
59.
Portland Public Schools (2001) Federal child nutrition programs, free and reduced-price meal counts and percentages, October, 2001.
60.
Portland Public Schools (2007) School profiles and enrollment data 2007–2008.
ReayDBallS (1997) ‘Spoilt for choice’: The working class and educational markets. Oxford Review of Education23(1): 89–101.
63.
RoseN (1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
64.
RossellC (1995) Controlled-choice desegregation plans: Not enough choice, too much control?Urban Affairs Review31(1): 43–76.
65.
RynersonCYangX (2017) Portland Public Schools enrollment forecast, 2017–18 to 2031–2, based on October 2016 enrollments. Portland, OR: Portland State University Population Research Center.
66.
ScottJ (2013) Rosa Parks moment? School choice and the marketization of civil rights. Critical Studies in Education54(1): 5–18.
67.
SeddenT (2001) Review essay: Revisiting inequality and education: A reminder of class; a retrieval of politics; a rethinking of governance. Melbourne Studies in Education42(2): 131–144.
SerbuloL (2017) Closing schools is like ‘taking away part of my body’: The impact of gentrification on neighborhood public schools in inner Northeast Portland. Belgeo2–3.
70.
ShoemakerR (1978) Portland schools face legal dilemma in busing issue. The Oregonian, 12November, p. A20.
71.
SolórzanoDOrnelasA (2002) A critical race analysis of Advanced Placement classes: A case of educational inequality. Journal of Latinos and Education4: 215–229.
72.
TaylorS (1997) Critical policy analysis: Exploring texts, contexts and consequences. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education18(1): 23–35.
73.
Taylor WebbPGulsonK (2011) Education policy as proto-fascism: The aesthetics of racial neo-liberalism. PedagogickýČasopis2: 173–194.
74.
ThielE (2013) Another look at ‘balancing’ Portland Public Schools’ Jefferson cluster. The Oregonian, 18January, p. B6.
75.
WilliamsL (1980) Blacks feel compromise not enough. The Oregonian, 19May, p. 25.
