The global infrastructure public-private partnership and the extra-territorial politics of collective provision: The case of regional rail transit in Denver,USA

Abstract

Chinese

Drawing upon a case study of regional transit in Denver, Colorado, this article describes and accounts for the emergence of the global infrastructure public-private partnership (GIP3) as a novel extra-territorial mechanism for financing and delivering transportation infrastructure projects across large metropolitan regions in the United States (US). Unlike traditional locally-funded public-private partnerships, a GIP3 involves a global (i.e. extra-territorial) consortium of private sector construction firms and investors which enters into a long-term contract with a regional public agency to finance, operate, maintain and deliver strategic investments in transportation infrastructure. In 2004, Denver region voters approved a sales tax increase to fund the Denver Regional Transportation District (RTD)’s US$4.7 billion FasTracks programme, a 122-mile extension of light and commuter rail along six corridors. Faced with a shortfall in regional funding, the Denver RTD subsequently entered into a contract with a GIP3 consortium to finance and deliver the Eagle P3 project, a major component of the FasTracks system to Denver International Airport. The article argues that future research on GIP3 contractual agreements needs to consider the local control of infrastructure assets and the integrity of supporting regional collaborative governance arrangements.

Keywords

collective provision Denver infrastructure finance public-private partnerships regional transit USA

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguilar

(2016) A-Line design questions that have caused travel delays were brought up as early as 2013. Denver Post, 21 October. Available at: http://www.denverpost.com/2016/10/21/rtd-a-line-design-delays-lightning-issues/ (accessed 7 December 2017).

Aguilar

(2017) Future of RTD’s A, B and G lines – long in limbo because of costly gate crossing problems – could become clearer Wednesday. Denver Post, 27 September. Available at: http://www.denverpost.com/2017/09/27/rtd-a-b-g-line-light-rail-problems/ (accessed 7 December 2017).

Allen

Pryke

(2013) Financializing household water: Thames Water, MEIF, and ‘ring-fenced’ politics. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 6: 419–439.

Barrow

(2016) Maryland Purple Line reaches financial close. International Railway Journal, 28 June. Available at: http://www.railjournal.com/index.php/north-america/maryland-purple-line-reaches-financial-close.html (accessed 15 December 2017).

Bish

(1971) The Public Economy of Metropolitan Areas. Chicago, IL: Markham Series in Public Policy Analysis.

Caon

(2014) Aberdeen launches fifth infrastructure fund. Investment Europe, 4 August. Available at: http://www.investmenteurope.net/regions/uk/aberdeen-launches-fifth-infrastructure-fund/ (accessed 20 April 2015).

Clark

Evans

(1998) The private provision of urban infrastructure: Financial intermediation through long-term contracts. Urban Studies 35(2): 301–319.

Cox

(2011) Commentary: From the new urban politics to the ‘new’ metropolitan politics. Urban Studies 48: 2661–2672.

Cox

Jonas

AEG

(1993) Urban development, collective consumption and the politics of metropolitan fragmentation. Political Geography 12: 8–37.

10.

Cox

Mair

(1988) Locality and community in the politics of local economic development. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 78: 307–325.

11.

DRCOG (Denver Regional Council of Governments) (2005) DRCOG 50^th Anniversary History. Denver: DRCOG. Available at: http://www.drcog.org/documents/50th%20DRCOG%20history%20.pdf (accessed 5 August 2015).

12.

DTP (Denver Transit Partners) (2015) Welcome to Denver Transit Partners. Denver: DTP. Available at: http://denvertransitpartners.com/ (accessed 15 April 2015).

13.

FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) (2007) User Guidebook on Implementing Public-private Partnerships for Transportation Infrastructure Projects in the United States. Washington, DC: FHWA. Available at: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/pdfs/ppp_user_guidebook_final_7–7–07.pdf (accessed 15 August 2016).

14.

Forrer

Kee

Newcomer

et al . (2010) Public–private partnerships and the public accountability question. Public Administration Review 70(3): 475–484.

15.

Goetz

(2013) Suburban sprawl or urban centers: Tensions and contradictions of smart growth approaches in Denver, Colorado. Urban Studies 50(11): 2178–2195.

16.

Goetz

Boschmann

(2018) Metropolitan Denver: Growth and Change in the Mile High City. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

17.

Goetz

Jonas

AEG

Brady

(2016) Innovative approaches to improved intermodal transportation infrastructure funding and financing through public-private partnerships: A Denver case study. Mississippi State and Denver Universities: National Center for Intermodal Transportation for Economic Competitiveness. Final Report on Grant No. NCITEC 2012-19 . Available at: http://www.ncitec.msstate.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012-19FR.pdf (accessed 30 August 2018).

18.

Gosling

Freeman

(2012) Case study report: John F. Kennedy International Airport Airtrain. Mineta Transportation Institute Working Paper: Research Project 2503. San Jose, CA: San Jose State University. Available at: http://transweb.sjsu.edu/PDFs/research/2503/2503_cases/2503-cs2-jfk-airtrain.pdf (accessed 7 December 2017).

19.

Graham

Marvin

(2001) Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. Abingdon: Routledge.

20.

Grisby

(2015) Open for Business: The Business Case for Investment in Public Transportation. Washington, DC: American Transportation Association. Available at: http://www.apta.com/resources/statistics/Documents/Caseforbusiness.pdf (accessed 7 December 2017).

21.

Hall

Jonas

AEG

(2014) Urban fiscal austerity, infrastructure provision and the struggle for regional transit in ‘Motor City’. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 7(1): 189–206.

22.

Harvey

(1982) The Limits to Capital. Oxford: Blackwell.

23.

Istrate

Puentes

(2011) Moving Forward on Public-Private Partnerships: US and International Experience with PPP Units. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/research/moving-forward-on-public-private-partnerships-u-s-and-international-experience-with-ppp-units (accessed 16 August 2016).

24.

Jessop

Peck

Tickell

(1999) Retooling the machine: Economic crisis, state restructuring, and urban politics. In: Jonas

AEG

Wilson

(eds) The Urban Growth Machine: Critical Perspectives Two Decades Later. Albany, NY: State University Press of New York, pp. 141–159.

25.

John Laing (2015) United States: Denver Eagle P3 Project. London: John Laing PLC. Available at: http://www.laing.com/project_portfolio/31/145/denver-eagle-p3-project-us.html (accessed 15 October 2015).

26.

Jonas

AEG

McCarthy

(2010) Redevelopment at all costs? A critical review and examination of the American model of urban management and regeneration. In: Diamond

Liddle

Southern

et al . (eds) Urban Regeneration Management: International Perspectives. London: Routledge, pp. 31–59.

27.

Jonas

AEG

Goetz

Bhattarcharjee

(2014) City-regionalism and the politics of collective provision: Regional transportation infrastructure in Denver, USA. Urban Studies 51(11): 2444–2465.

28.

Jonas

AEG

While

Gibbs

(2010) Managing infrastructural and service demands in new economic spaces: The new territorial politics of collective provision. Regional Studies 44(2): 183–200.

29.

Katz

Bradley

(2014) The Metropolitan Revolution: How Cities and Metros are Fixing Our Broken Politics and Fragile Economy. New York: Brookings Institution.

30.

Keil

Adie

J-P

(2015) ‘It’s not going to be suburban, it’s going to be all urban’: Assembling post-suburbia in the Toronto and Chicago regions. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39: 857–1066.

31.

Kirkpatrick

Smith

(2011) The infrastructural limits to growth: Rethinking the urban growth machine in times of fiscal crisis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35: 477–503.

32.

Kuta

and Boulder Daily Camera (2016) Why the train to Denver International Airport is named the “University of Colorado A-Line”. The Denver Post, 19 April. Available at: https://www.denverpost.com/2016/04/19/why-the-train-to-denver-international-airport-is-named-the-university-of-colorado-a-line/ (accessed 15 December 2016).

33.

Lam

PTI

Javed

(2015) Comparative study on the use of output specifications for Australian and UK PPP/PFI projects. ASCE Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 29(2): 1–11. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000554.

34.

Lieb

(2004) Voters climb aboard FasTracks tax boost – YES: 57.2% NO: 42.8% PRCTS: 88.4%. The Denver Post, 3 November. Available at: http://infoweb.newsbank.com (accessed 15 August 2010).

35.

Lieb

(2008) RTD to hear options on FasTracks dilemma. The Denver Post, 23 September. Available at: http://infoweb.newsbank.com (accessed 15 August 2010).

36.

Lieb

(2011) Feds provide FasTracks with billion dollar assist. The Denver Post, 1 September. Available at: http://infoweb.newsbank.com (accessed 15 September 2011).

37.

Logan

Molotch

(1987) Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

38.

Long

(2012) Denver’s botched FasTracks privatization. Reuters: Analysis & Opinion, 3 April. Available at: http://blogs.reuters.com/muniland/2012/04/03/denvers-botched-fastracks-privatization/ (accessed 25 April 2015).

39.

Mandri-Perrott

(2009) Private Sector Participation in Light Rail-Light Metro Transit Initiatives. The World Bank: PPIAF (Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility). Available at: http://www.ppiaf.org/sites/ppiaf.org/files/publication/PSP-LightRail-CMandri-Perrott.pdf (accessed 30 April 2015).

40.

NAO (National Audit Office) (2003) PFI: Construction Performance. London: UK Government NAO.

41.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2011) Pension Funds Investment in Infrastructure: A Survey. OECD, September. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/futures/infrastructureto2030/48634596.pdf (accessed 15 April 2015).

42.

O’Neill

(2013) The financialisation of infrastructure: The role of categorisation and property relations. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 6(3): 441–454.

43.

Ostrom

(1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

44.

Palmer

(2005) Private-sector portion of RAV risk isn’t so private, after all. The Vancouver Sun, 10 August, p. A3.

45.

Papajohn

Cui

Bayraktar

(2011) Public-private partnerships in US transportation: Research overview and a path forward. Journal of Management in Engineering 27(3): 126–135.

46.

Preqin (2012) Private equity funding remains weak in Q4 2011. Preqin press release, 4 January. Available at: https://www.preqin.com/docs/press/Private_Equity_Fundraising_2011.pdf (accessed 15 April 2015).

47.

Public Works Financing (2010) Denver Eagle P3 Financed, First U.S. Rail PPP. Edited by Reinhardt

. Westfield, NJ: Public Works Financing. Available at: http://www.pwfinance.net/document/research_reprints/7%20denver%20eagle.pdf (accessed 15 April 2015).

48.

Reinhardt

Utt

(2012) Can Public–Private Partnerships Fill the Transportation Funding Gap? Heritage Foundation Backgrounder, 2639. Available at: http://www.heritage.org/transportation/report/can-public-private-partnerships-fill-the-transportation-funding-gap (accessed 30 September 2015).

49.

Roumeliotis

(2012) Exclusive: Macquarie eyes $2 billion infrastructure fund-sources. Reuters: Business, 2 April. Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/02/us-macquarie-idUSBRE8310LB20120402 (accessed 15 April 2015).

50.

RTD (Denver Regional Transportation District) (2012) RTD 2011 Annual Report to DRCOG on FasTracks. Denver: RTD. Available at: http://www.rtd-fastracks.com/media/uploads/main/SB208_2011_report_4-3-2012.pdf (accessed 15 April 2015).

51.

RTD (Denver Regional Transportation District) (2015) Best Practices. Denver: RTD. Available at: http://www.rtd-denver.com/documents/best-practices-2015.pdf (accessed 4 September 2018).

52.

RTD (Denver Regional Transportation District) (2016) Inside RTD FasTracks. Denver: RTD. Available at: http://www.rtd-fastracks.com/media/uploads/main/Inside_RTD_FasTracks_NOVEMBER_2016_FINAL.pdf (accessed 15 December 2016).

53.

RTD FasTracks (2009) RTD Board Briefing: Eagle P3 Project, Draft RFP. Denver: RTD. Available at: https://admin.rtd-fastracks.com/media/uploads/main/PPP_Board_briefing_010609_v5.pdf (accessed 4 September 2018).

54.

RTD FasTracks (2015a) Eagle P3 project. Denver: RTD. Available at: http://www.rtd-fastracks.com/ep3_2 (accessed 30 October 2015).

55.

RTD FasTracks (2015b) Eagle P3 Facts and Figures. Denver: RTD. Available at: http://www.rtd-denver.com/FF-EagleP3.shtml (accessed 30 October 2015).

56.

RTD FasTracks (2015c) FasTracks Eagle P3 project. Denver: RTD. Available at: http://rtd-fastracks.com/main_126 (accessed 15 October 2015).

57.

Rusk

(2003) Denver Divided: Sprawl, Race, and Poverty in Denver. Denver, CO: University of Denver Morgridge College of Education.

58.

Sbragia

(1996) Debt Wish: Entrepreneurial Cities, US Federalism, and Economic Development. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

59.

Schiller

Kenworthy

(2018) An Introduction to Sustainable Transportation: Planning, Policy and Implementation. 2nd edn. London and New York: Routledge.

60.

Siemiatycki

(2006) Implications of private-public partnerships on the development of urban public transit infrastructure: The Case of Vancouver, Canada. Journal of Planning Education and Research 26(2): 137–151.

61.

Siemiatycki

(2009) Delivering transportation infrastructure through public-private partnerships: Planning concerns. Journal of the American Planning Association 76(1): 43–58.

62.

Storper

(2013) The Keys to the City: How Economics, Institutions, Social Interaction, and Politics Shape Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

63.

Thomas

(2014) Legal Research Digest 45: Transit Public-Private Partnerships: Legal Issues. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.

64.

Torrance

(2008) Forging glocal governance? Urban infrastructures as networked financial products. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32(1): 1–21.

65.

US DOT (US Department of Transportation) (2015) Eagle P3 Project, Denver, CO. 29 September. Washington, DC: USDOT. Available at: https://www.transportation.gov/policy-initiatives/build-america/eagle-p3-project-denver-co (accessed 3 September 2018).

66.

US DOT (US Department of Transportation) (n.d.) Project Profile: Hudson-Bergen Light Rail. Washington, DC: USDOT, Federal Highway Administration. Available at: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/project_profiles/nj_hudson_bergen.aspx#top-banner-wrap (accessed 7 December 2017).

67.

Valila

(2005) How expensive are cost savings? On the economics of PPPs. European Investment Bank Papers 10(1): 94–119.

68.

Van der Hilst

(2012) Using Public-Private Partnerships to Carry Out Highway Projects. US Congress: Congressional Budget Office.

69.

Wachsmuth

(2015) Megaregions and the urban question: The new strategic terrain for US urban competitiveness. In: Harrison

Hoyler

(eds) (2015) Megaregions: Globalization’s New Urban Form? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 51–74.