In this commentary, I argue that Rancière’s concept of the ‘part of those that have no part’ is a valuable and overlooked intervention in how the constitution of ‘the political’ can be understood. While some reject the narrowing of what counts as ‘political’ in Rancière’s work, I argue that by drawing attention to inevitability of the constitutive outside of the social, Rancière forces a constructive reckoning with the way more capacious conceptions of the political can elide and reproduce the inherently partial nature of the attendant social formation.
BeveridgeRKochP (forthcoming) The post-political trap? Reflections on politics, agency and the city. Urban Studies54(1): 31–43.
2.
DavidsonMIvesonK (2015) Recovering the politics of the city. From the ‘post-political city’ to a ‘method of equality’ for critical urban geography. Progress in Human Geography39(5): 543–559.
3.
DericksonK (2016) On the politics of recognition in critical urban scholarship. Urban Geography: 37(6): 824–829.
4.
DericksonK (2015) Urban Geography I: Locating urban theory in the ‘urban age’. Progress in Human Geography39(5): 647–657.
5.
DericksonKMacKinnonD (2015) Toward an interim politics of resourcefulness for the Anthropocene. Annals of the Association of American Geographers105(2): 304–312.
6.
McCarthyJ (2013) We have never been ‘post-political’. Capitalism Nature Socialism24(1): 19–25.
7.
MouffC (2005) On the Political. New York: Routledge.
8.
PaddisonR (2009) Some reflections on the limitations to public participation in the post-political city. L’Espace Politique. Revue en ligne de géographie politique et de géopolitique8.
9.
RancièreJ (2010) Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
