Critics of many popular urban school reforms in the United States allege that these reform efforts unfairly insert market forces into the public domain, resulting in widening inequalities. In this paper, I challenge the notion that market forces per se are responsible for the gentrification that school reform often facilitates. Drawing on in-depth interviews, government documents, and media accounts, I analyse one component of school reform in Boston, the overhaul of the city’s public school student assignment policy, which curtailed parental choice (and, therefore, market pressure) within the city’s school system, while still potentially perpetuating inequalities. I discuss the implications of these findings for urban social theory related to education reform.
BillinghamCMKimelbergSM (2013) Middle-class parents, urban schooling, and the shift from consumption to production of urban space. Sociological Forum28(1): 85–108.
Brown-SaracinoJ (2009) A Neighborhood That Never Changes: Gentrification, Social Preservation, and the Search for Authenticity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
BushawWJLopezSJ (2011) Betting on teachers: The 43rd annual Phi Delta Kappan/Gallup poll on the public’s attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan93(1): 8–26.
13.
ButlerTRobsonG (2003) Plotting the middle classes: Gentrification and circuits of education in London. Housing Studies18(1): 5–28.
14.
ChubbJEMoeTE (1990) Politics, Markets, and America’s Schools. Washington, DC: The Brookings Foundation.
15.
ComptonMWeinerL (eds) (2008) The Global Assault on Teaching, Teachers, and Their Unions: Stories for Resistance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
CucchiaraMB (2013) Marketing Schools, Marketing Cities: Who Wins and Who Loses When Schools Become Urban Amenities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
CucchiaraMBHorvatEM (2009) Perils and promises: Middle-class parental involvement in urban schools. American Educational Research Journal46(4): 974–1004.
18.
EbbertS (2012) Parents speak up on school wants. The Boston Globe, 6August, B1.
19.
EdelbergJKurlandS (2009) How to Walk to School: Blueprint for a Neighborhood School Renaissance. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
20.
FormisanoRP (1991) Boston against Busing: Race, Class, and Ethnicity in the 1960s and 1970s. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
21.
GordonHR (forthcoming) ‘We can’t let them fail for one more day’: School reform urgency and the politics of reformer-community alliances. Race Ethnicity and Education.
22.
HackworthJ (2007) The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
23.
HankinsKB (2007) The final frontier: Charter schools as new community institutions of gentrification. Urban Geography28(2): 113–128.
24.
HaughneyC (2010) Parents’ real estate strategy: Schools come first. The New York Times, 12July, A20.
25.
HenigJR (1994) Rethinking School Choice: Limits of the Market Metaphor. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
26.
HolmeJJ (2002) Buying homes, buying schools: School choice and the social construction of school quality. Harvard Education Review72(2): 177–205.
JaneyKOrtizM (2009) Wrong assignment for Boston schools. The Boston Globe, 3June, A17.
30.
JohnsonCR (2013) A bold school assignment plan. The Boston Globe, 2March, A9.
31.
KarstenL (2003) Family gentrifiers: Challenging the city as a place simultaneously to build a career and to raise children. Urban Studies40(12): 2573–2584.
32.
KimelbergSM (forthcoming) ‘What really could go wrong in kindergarten?’: Middle-class parents, risk, and urban public schools. In: LareauAGoyetteK (eds) Choosing Homes, Choosing Schools. New York: The Russell Sage Foundation.
33.
KimelbergSMBillinghamCM (2013) Attitudes toward diversity and the school choice process: Middle-class parents in a segregated urban public school district. Urban Education48(2): 198–231.
34.
LeesLSlaterTWylyE (2008) Gentrification. New York: Routledge.
35.
LipmanP (2011) The New Political Economy of Urban Education: Neoliberalism, Race, and the Right to the City. New York: Routledge.
36.
LipmanP (2012) Neoliberal urbanism, race, and urban school reform. In: WatkinsWH (ed.) The Assault on Public Education: Confronting the Politics of Corporate School Reform. New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 33–54.
37.
LoganJROakleyDStowellJ (2008) School segregation in metropolitan regions, 1970–2000: The impacts of policy choices on public education. American Journal of Sociology113(6): 1611–1644.
38.
LukasJA (1985) Common Ground: A Turbulent Decade in the Lives of Three American Families. New York: Vintage.
39.
OrfieldG (2013) Choice and civil rights: Forgetting history, facing consequences. In: OrfieldGFrankenbergE (eds) Educational Delusions: Why Choice Can Deepen Inequality and How to Make Schools Fair. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 3–35.
40.
OrfieldGFrankenbergE (eds) (2013) Educational Delusions: Why Choice Can Deepen Inequality and How to Make Schools Fair. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
41.
ParkinF (1979) Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois Critique. New York: Columbia University Press.
42.
PoseyL (2012) Middle- and upper-middle-class parent action for urban public schools: Promise or paradox?Teachers College Record114(1): 1–43.
43.
RodaAWellsAS (2013) School choice policies and racial segregation: Where white parents’ good intentions, anxiety, and privilege collide. American Journal of Education119(2): 261–293.
44.
SaltmanKJ (2010) The Gift of Education: Public Education and Venture Philanthropy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
45.
SchneiderMTeskePMarschallM (2000) Choosing Schools: Consumer Choice and the Quality of American Schools. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
46.
SohoniDSaporitoS (2009) Mapping school segregation: Using GIS to explore racial segregation between schools and their corresponding attendance areas. American Journal of Education115(4): 569–600.
47.
StillmanJB (2012) Gentrification and Schools: The Process of Integration When Whites Reverse Flight. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
48.
VaradyDPRaffelJA (1995) Selling Cities: Attracting Homebuyers through Schools and Housing Programs. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
49.
VaznisJ (2009a) New school plan could hurt poorest neighborhoods. The Boston Globe, 25February, A1.
50.
VaznisJ (2009b) School buses’ vacant seats costing hub. The Boston Globe, 2February, A1.
51.
VaznisJ (2010) Rights groups sever school ties. The Boston Globe, 15July, B1.
52.
VaznisJ (2011) Another try set on school choice. The Boston Globe, 13April, B1.
53.
VaznisJ (2012) MIT Has plan for Boston schools. The Boston Globe, 28October, B1.
54.
VaznisJ (2013a) School choice overhaul OK’d. The Boston Globe, 14March, A1.
55.
VaznisJ (2013b) School choice plan is selected. The Boston Globe, 26February, A1.
56.
VaznisJAndersenT (2012) Plans upend school assignments. The Boston Globe, 25September, A1.
57.
VinovskisMA (2009) From A Nation at Risk to No Child Left Behind: National Education Goals and the Creation of Federal Education Policy. New York: Teachers College Press.
58.
WellsASCrainRL (1997) Stepping over the Color Line: African–American Students in White Suburban Schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
59.
WellsASHolmeJJRevillaAT. (2009) Both Sides Now: The Story of Desegregation’s Graduates. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
