Research has shown that there is a strong negative relationship between social spending and poverty levels. Among urban inequality researchers it is often assumed that, compared with the USA, the welfare state has mitigated social differences explaining lower levels of urban inequality in most European countries. However, research on the role of the welfare state is often conducted on the national level, and is thus unable to draw conclusions on the effects of social spending and redistribution on a lower level, failing to take the within-country variation into account. This study connects welfare state research to urban inequality research by investigating the effects of social spending on poverty in urban and non-urban areas. We have conducted a cross-national multilevel logistic regression analysis using Eurostat and European Social Survey data of 2008. Our findings suggest that the effects of social spending are unequally distributed within countries.
ArrowKJ (1979) The trade-off between growth and equity. In: GreenfieldHILevensonAMHamovitchW. (eds) Theory for Economic Efficiency: Essays in Honor of Abba. P. Lerner. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–11.
2.
BarryB (1990) The welfare state versus the relief of poverty. In: WareAGoodinRE (eds) Needs and Welfare. London: Sage, pp. 73–103.
3.
BehrendtC (2002) Holes in the safety net? Social security and the alleviation of poverty in a comparative perspective. In: SiggRBehrendtC (eds) Social Security in the Global Village. International Social Security Series 8, New Brunswick, NJ/London: Transaction Publishers, pp. 333–358.
4.
BlankRM (1988) The effect of welfare and wage levels on the location decisions of female headed households. Journal of Urban Economics24(2): 186–211.
5.
BorjasGJ (1999) Immigration and welfare magnets. Journal of Labor Economics17(4): 607–637.
6.
BruecknerJKZenouY (2003) Space and unemployment: The labor market effects of spatial mismatch. Journal of Labor Economics21(1): 242–262.
7.
BuckN (1997) Social Divisions and Labor Market Change in London: National, Urban and Global Factors. ISER Working Paper Series, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
8.
ButlerSKondratasS (1987) Out of the Poverty Trap: A Conservative Strategy for Welfare Reform. New York: The Free Press.
9.
CaminadaKGoudswaardK (2001) International trends in income inequality and social policy. International Tax and Public Finance8(4): 395–415.
10.
CaminadaKGoudswaardK (2008) Effectiveness of Poverty Reduction in the EU: A Descriptive Analysis. Department of Economics Research Memorandum 2008.06. Leiden University.
11.
CaminadaKGoudswaardK (2009) Social Expenditure and Poverty Reduction in the EU15 and other OECD Countries. Department of Economics Research Memorandum 2009.02, Leiden University.
12.
CaminadaKGoudswaardKKosterF (2012) Social income transfers and poverty: A cross-country analysis for OECD countries.International Journal of Social Welfare21(2): 115–126.
13.
ChampionAG (1989) Counterurbanization: The Changing Pace and Nature of Population Deconcentration. London: Edward Arnold.
14.
ChristopherKEnglandPSmeedingTM. (2002) The gender gap in poverty in modern nations: Single motherhood, the market, and the state. Sociological Perspectives45(3): 219–242.
15.
CrookC (1997) The future of the state. The Economist, 20September, pp. S1–S48.
16.
DallingerU (2010) Public support for redistribution: What explains cross-national differences?Journal of European Social Policy20: 333–349.
17.
DamerellRG (1968) Triumph in a White Suburb. New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc.
18.
DuncanODDuncanB (1957) The Negro Population of Chicago: A Study of Residential Succession. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
EdlundJ (2006) Trust in the capability of the welfare state and general welfare state support: Sweden 1997–2002. Acta Sociologica49(4): 395–417.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
Esping-AndersenGMylesJ (2009) Economic inequality and the welfare state. In: SalverdaWNolanBSmeedingTM (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 639–664.
23.
European Social Survey (2008) European Social Survey Round 4. Data file edition 1.0, Norwegian Social Science Data Services.
24.
Eurostat (2008) The European System of Integrated Social Protection Statistics (ESSPROS). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
25.
Eurostat (2012) Structural Indicators EU – Social Cohesion. Available at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu (accessed 25 September 2013).
26.
FainsteinSS (2001) Inequality in global city-regions. In: ScottAJ (ed.) Global City- Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 285–298.
27.
FirebaughG (2003) The New Geography of Global Income Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
28.
FirebaughGGoeslingB (2004) Accounting for the recent decline in global income inequality. American Journal of Sociology110: 283–312.
29.
FoxJ (1991) Regression Diagnostics: An Introduction (Vol. 79). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
30.
FriedmanMFriedmanR (1979) Free to Choose: A Personal Statement. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
31.
FriedmannJ (1986) The world city hypothesis. Development and Change17(1): 69–83.
32.
FriedrichsJ (2002) Response: Contrasting US and European findings on poverty neighbourhoods. Housing Studies17(1): 101–104.
33.
GlaeserELRessegerMTobioK (2009) Inequality in cities. Journal of Regional Science49(4): 617–646.
34.
GobillonLSelodHZenouY (2007) The mechanisms of spatial mismatch. Urban Studies44(12): 2401–2427.
35.
GoodinRELeGrandJ (1987) Not Only the Poor: the Middle Classes and the Welfare State. London: Allen and Unwin.
36.
GottschalkPSmeedingTM (1997) Cross-national comparisons of earnings and income inequality. Journal of Economic Literature35(2): 633–687.
37.
HamnettC (1994) Social polarisation in global cities: Theory and evidence. Urban Studies31: 401–424.
38.
HamnettC (1996) Social polarisation, economic restructuring and welfare state regimes. Urban Studies33: 1407–1430.
39.
HamnettC (2002) Social polarization in London: The income evidence, 1979–93. In: CrossMMooreR (ed.) Globalization and the New City. Houndmills, NY: Palgrave, pp. 168–199.
40.
HavemanR (2008) What Does It Mean to Be Poor in a Rich Society? Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Paper 1356–08. Madison, WI: IRP.
41.
HirschmanAO (1991) The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
JivrajS (2012) Modelling socioeconomic neighborhood change due to internal migration in England. Urban Studies49(16): 3565–3578.
43.
KainJ F (1968) Housing segregation, negro employment, and metropolitan decentralization. The Quarterly Journal of Economics82(2): 1975–1997.
44.
KainJF (2004) A pioneer’s perspective on the spatial mismatch literature. Urban Studies41(1): 7–32.
45.
KenworthyL (1995) Equality and efficiency: The illusory trade-off. European Journal of Political Research27: 225–254.
46.
KenworthyL (1999) Do social-welfare policies reduce poverty? A cross-national assessment. Social Forces77(3): 1119–1139.
47.
KenworthyL (2004) Welfare States, Real Incomes, and Poverty. Working Paper No. 370, Luxembourg Income Study (LIS).
48.
KorpiWPalmeJ (1998) The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: Welfare state institutions, inequality, and poverty in Western countries. American Sociological Review63(5): 661–687.
49.
KumlinS (2007) Overloaded or undermined: European welfare states in the face of performance dissatisfaction. In: SvallforsS (ed.) The Political Sociology of the Welfare State: Institutions, Cleavages and Orientations. Stanford, CT: Stanford University Press, pp. 80–116.
50.
LeeDR (1987) The trade-off between equality and efficiency: Short-run politics and long-run realities. Public Choice53: 149–165.
51.
LeGrandJ (1982) The Strategy of Equality. Redistribution and the Social Services. London: George Allen and Unwin.
52.
LindbeckA (1995) Hazardous welfare state dynamics. American Economic Review85(2): 9–15.
53.
LindbeckA (2006) The Welfare State. Background, Achievements, Problems. Stockholm: IUI, The Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
54.
MilanovicB (2003) Can we discern the effect of globalization on income distribution? Evidence from household surveys. The World Bank Economic Review19(1): 21–44.
55.
MohringK (2012) The Fixed Effect Approach as Alternative to Multilevel Models for Cross-National Analyses. WP 16/2012, GK SOCLIFE Working Paper Series, University of Cologne.
56.
MurrayC (1984) Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950–1980. New York: Basic Books.
57.
MusterdS (2005) Social and ethnic segregation in Europe: Levels, causes and effects. Journal of Urban Affairs27(3): 331–348.
58.
MusterdSOstendorfW (1998) Urban Segregation and the Welfare State: Inequality and Exclusion in Western Cities. London/New York: Routledge.
59.
NolanBMarxI (2009) Economic inequality, poverty and social exclusion. In: SalverdaWNolanBSmeedingTM (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 315–341.
60.
OstendorfWMusterdSde VosS (2001) Social mix and the neighbourhood effect. Policy ambitions and empirical evidence. Housing Studies16(3): 371–380.
61.
PaasTSchlitteF (2006) Regional Income Inequality and Convergence Processes in the EU-25. HWWA Discussion Paper No. 355, Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
62.
PinksterFMVölkerB (2009) Local social networks and social resources in two Dutch neighbourhoods. Housing Studies24(2): 225–242.
63.
PressmanS (2000) Explaining the Gender Poverty Gap in Developed and Transitional Economies. Working Paper No. 243, Luxembourg Income Study (LIS).
64.
SassenS (1991) The Global City. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65.
SassenS (2001) The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66.
SmeedingTM (2006) Poor people in rich nations: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Economic Perspectives20(1): 69–90.
67.
SwankD (1998) Funding the welfare state: Globalization and the taxation of business in advanced market economies. Political Studies46(4): 671–692.
68.
TullockG (1983) Economics of Income Redistribution. Hingham, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
69.
TullockG (1997) The reality of redistribution. In: NeillJ (ed.) Poverty and Inequality. Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute, pp.127–138.
