This article examines acculturation preferences of the Turkish second generation in 11 European cities and compares these with expectations of national society comparison group members. Multiple classification analysis (MCA) was used to examine the effects of city of residence, exposure to national society value system, cultural distance, social exclusion and neighbourhood quality on acculturation preferences. MCA was also applied to profile respondents according to background characteristics and dominant acculturation preference style, which is useful for both theory development and design of integration policies for specific target groups. Results show that the majority of the second generation maintain integration preferences, although sub-groups with particular background characteristics such as low educational attainment, experiencing discrimination and living in a low-quality neighbourhood, maintain separation or marginalisation preferences. Contextual factors, notably city of residence, the proxy for national integration policy orientation, seemed more important in explaining acculturation preferences than individual-level factors.
AlbaR.NeeV. (2003) Bright vs. blurred boundaries: second-generation assimilation and exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(1), pp. 20–49.
2.
AndrewsF. M.MorganJ. N.SonquistJ. A.KlemL. (1973) Multiple classification analysis, 2nd edn.Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
3.
Arentz-TóthJ. V.VijverF. J. R. van de (2006) Issues in conceptualization and assessment of acculturation, in: BornsteinM. H.CoteL. R. (Eds) Acculturation and Parent–Child Relationships: Measurement and Development, pp. 33–62. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
BerryJ. W. (1986) Psychology of acculturation, in: BermanJ. (Ed.) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 37, pp. 201–234. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska.
5.
BerryJ. W. (1997) Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(1), pp. 5–68.
6.
BerryJ. W. (2001) A psychology of immigration, Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), pp. 615–631.
7.
BerryJ. W.SabatierC. (2010) Acculturation, discrimination, and adaptation among second generation immigrant youth in Montreal and Paris, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34, pp. 191–207.
8.
BerryJ. W.KalinR.TaylorD. (1977) Multiculturalism and ethnic attitudes in Canada. Ottawa, Ontario: Supply and Services.
9.
BerryJ. W.TrimbleJ.OlmedaE. (1986) The assessment of acculturation, in: LonnerW. J.BerryJ. W. (Eds) Field Methods in Cross-cultural Research. London: Sage.
10.
BerryJ. W.KimU.MindeT.MokD. (1987) Comparative studies of acculturative stress, International Migration Review, 21, pp. 491–511.
11.
BerryJ. W.PhinneyJ. S.SamD. L.VedderP. (Eds) (2006) Immigrant youth: acculturation, identity and adaptation, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55(3), pp. 303–332.
12.
BerryJ. W.KimU.PowerS.YoungM.BujakiM. (1989) Acculturation studies in plural societies, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 38, pp. 135–186.
13.
BourhisR. Y.MoiseL. C.PerreaultS.SenecalS. (1997) Towards an interactive acculturation model: a social psychological approach, International Journal of Psychology, 32(6), pp. 369–386.
14.
British Council and the Migration Policy Group (2011) Migrant integration policy index (www.mipex.eu/; accessed 8 October 2012).
15.
CrulM.SchneiderJ. (2010) Comparative integration context theory: participation and belonging in new diverse European cities, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(7), pp. 1249–1268.
16.
CrulM.SchneiderJ.LelieF. (Eds) (2012) The European Second Generation Compared: Does the Integration Context Matter?Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
17.
DonàG.BerryJ. W. (1994) Acculturation attitudes and acculturative stress of central American refugees, International Journal of Psychology, 29(1), pp. 57–70.
European Commission (2007a) Europe’s demographic future: facts and figures on challenges and opportunities. European Commission Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, Brussels.
FarguesP. (2005) How many migrants from, and to, Mediterranean countries of the Middle East and North Africa? (http://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/11684; accessed 18 February 2013).
23.
FonerN.AlbaR. (2008) Immigrant religion in the U.S. and Western Europe: bridge or barrier to inclusion?, International Migration Review, 42(2), pp. 360–392.
24.
GansH. (1992) Second-generation decline: scenarios for the economic and ethnic futures of the post-1965 American immigrants, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 15, pp. 173–192.
25.
GlazerN.MoynihanD. P. (1963) Beyond the Melting Pot. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
GordonM. M. (1964) Assimilation in American Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
GroenewoldG.Lessard-PhillipsL. (2012) Research methodology, in: CrulM.SchneiderJ.LelieF. (Eds) The European Second Generation Compared: Does the Integration Context Matter?Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
28.
HuschekD.ValkH. A. G. deLiefbroerA. C. (2012) Partner choice patterns among the descendants of Turkish immigrants in Europe, European Journal of Population, 28(3), pp. 241–269.
29.
KoopmansR. (2010) Trade-offs between equality and difference: immigrant integration, multiculturalism and the welfare state in cross-national perspective, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(1), pp. 1–26.
30.
LinI. F.SchaefferN. C. (1995) Using survey participants to estimate the impact of nonparticipation, Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, pp. 236–258.
31.
LintingM.MeulmanJ. J.GroenenP. J. F.KooijA. J. van der (2007) Nonlinear principal components analysis: introduction and application, Psychological Methods, 12(3), pp. 336–358.
32.
McIverJ. P.CarminesE. G. (1981) Uni-dimensional Scaling. London: Sage Publications.
33.
ModoodT.BerthoudR.LakeyJ.NazrooJ.. (1997) Ethnic minorities in Britain: diversity and disadvantage—the fourth national survey of ethnic minorities. Policy Studies Institute, London.
34.
MykytaL.EloE. T.MargolisR.CulhaneJ. (2005) Neighbourhood characteristics: objective versus subjective measurement. Population Studies Centre, University of Pennsylvania and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia.
35.
NavasM.RojasA. J.GarciaM.PumaresP. (2007) Acculturation strategies and attitudes according to the relative acculturation extended model (RAEM): the perspectives of natives versus immigrants, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31(1), pp. 67–86.
36.
OdéA.VeenmanJ. (2003) The ethno-cultural and socioeconomic position of ethnic minority groups in the Netherlands, in: HagendoornA.HagendoornL.VeenmanJ.VolleberghW. (Eds) Integrating Immigrants in the Netherlands: Cultural versus Socio-economic Integration. Farnham: Ashgate.
PortesA.RumbautR. (2001) Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
39.
PortesA.ZhouM. (1993) The new second generation: segmented assimilation and its variants, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 530(1), pp. 74–96.
40.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS.EarlsF. (1997) Neighbourhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy, Science, 277, pp. 918–924.
41.
SchnellP. (2012) Educational Mobility of Second-Generation Turks in Cross-national Perspective. Doctoral dissertation. University of Amsterdam.
42.
Statistics Netherlands (2013) Statline database (http://statline.cbs.nl; accessed 6 February 2013).
43.
StoopI. A. L (2005) The hunt for the last respondent: non-response in sample surveys. SCP Report No. 2005/8, The Netherlands Institute for Social Research, The Hague.
44.
VermeulenH.PenninxR. (2000) Immigrant Integration: The Dutch Case. Amsterdam: Spinhuis Publishers.
45.
WardC.Rana-DeubaA. (1999) Acculturation and adaptation revisited, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(4), pp. 422–444.
