The Impacts of LRT,Neighbourhood Characteristics,and Self-selection on Auto Ownership: Evidence from Minneapolis-St. Paul

Abstract

There is a growing interest in exploring the relationships between the built environment and auto ownership and a number of studies have investigated the impact of rail transit on travel behaviour. However, few have disentangled the impact of rail transit on auto ownership from the influences of the built environment and residential self-selection. Using the light rail transit (LRT) in the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area, USA, this study applies the statistical control approach and quasi-longitudinal design to examine the effects of LRT, neighbourhood design and self-selection on auto ownership. It is found that residential self-selection influences auto ownership; backyard size, off-street parking and business density marginally affect auto ownership; and the LRT does not have an independent impact on auto ownership beyond neighbourhood design and self-selection. The results point to the importance of neighbourhood design in rail transit development.

Keywords

land use longitudinal design planning transit-oriented development travel behaviour vehicle ownership

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acker

V. van

Witlox

(2010) Car ownership as a mediating variable in car travel behaviour research using a structural equation modelling approach to identify its dual relationship, Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1), pp. 65–74.

Aditjandra

P. T.

Cao

Mulley

(2012) Understanding neighbourhood design impact on travel behaviour: an application of structural equations model to British metropolitan data, Transportation Research Part A, 46(1), pp. 22–32.

Anastasopoulos

Karlaftis

Haddock

Mannering

(2012) Household automobile and motorcycle ownership analyzed with random parameters bivariate ordered probit model, Transportation Research Record, 2279, pp. 12–20.

Arrington

G. B.

Cervero

(2008) Effects of TOD on housing, parking, and travel. Transit Cooperative Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

Bhat

C. R.

Guo

J. Y.

(2007) A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels, Transportation Research Part B, 41(5), pp. 506–526.

Boarnet

M. G.

Sarmiento

(1998) Can land-use policy really affect travel behaviour? A study of the link between non-work travel and land-use characteristics, Urban Studies, 35(7), pp. 1155–1169.

Cao

(2010) Exploring causal effects of neighborhood type on walking behavior using stratification on the propensity score, Environment and Planning A, 42(2), pp. 487–504.

Cao

Chatman

D. G.

(2012) How will land use policies affect travel? The importance of residential sorting. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

Cao

Schoner

(2013) The influences of light rail transit on transit uses: an exploration of station area residents along the Hiawatha line in Minneapolis. Paper presented at the 92nd Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

10.

Cao

Mokhtarian

P. L.

Handy

S. L.

(2007a) Cross-sectional and quasi-panel explorations of the connection between the built environment and auto ownership, Environment and Planning A, 39, pp. 830–847.

11.

Cao

Mokhtarian

P. L.

Handy

S. L.

(2007b) Do changes in neighborhood characteristics lead to changes in travel behavior? A structural equations modeling approach, Transportation, 34(5), pp. 535–556.

12.

Cao

Mokhtarian

P. L.

Handy

S. L.

(2009) Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: a focus on empirical findings, Transport Reviews, 29(3), pp. 359–395.

13.

Cao

Fan

(2010) Exploring the connections among residential location, self-selection, and driving: propensity score matching with multiple treatments, Transportation Research Part A, 44(10), pp. 797–805.

14.

Cervero

(1994) Transit-based housing in California: evidence on ridership impacts, Transport Policy, 1(3), pp. 174–183.

15.

Chatman

D. G.

(2013) Does TOD need the T? On the importance of factors other than rail access, Journal of the American Planning Association, 79(1), pp. 17–31.

16.

CTOD (Center For Transit-Oriented Development) (2004) Hidden in plain sight: capturing the demand for housing near transit. CTOD, Washington, DC.

17.

CTOD (2006) Preserving and promoting diverse transit-oriented neighborhoods. CTOD, Washington, DC.

18.

Eriksson

Arvidsson

Gebel

Ohlsson

Sundquist

(2012) Walkability parameters, active transportation and objective physical activity: moderating and mediating effects of motor vehicle ownership in a cross-sectional study, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1):123.

19.

Ewing

Cervero

(2001) Travel and the built environment: a synthesis, Transportation Research Record, 1780, pp. 87–114.

20.

Ewing

Cervero

(2010) Travel and the built environment: a meta-analysis, Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), pp. 265–294.

21.

Flamm

(2009) The impacts of environmental knowledge and attitudes on vehicle ownership and use, Transportation Research Part D, 14(4), pp. 272–279.

22.

Giuliano

(2004) Land use impacts of transportation investments: highway and transit, in: Hanson

Giuliano

(Eds)The Geography of Urban Transportation. New York: The Guilford Press.

23.

Giuliano

Dargay

(2006) Car ownership, travel and land use: a comparison of the US and Great Britain, Transportation Research Part A, 40(2), pp. 106–124.

24.

Goetzke

Weinberger

(2012) Separating contextual from endogenous effects in automobile ownership models, Environment and Planning A, 44(5), pp. 1032–1046.

25.

Handy

S. L.

Niemeier

D. A.

(1997) Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives, Environment and Planning A, 29(7), pp. 1175–1194.

26.

Horner

(2004) Exploring metropolitan accessibility and urban structure, Urban Geography, 25(3), pp. 264–284.

27.

Khattak

A. J.

Rodriguez

(2005) Travel behavior in neo-traditional neighborhood developments: a case study in USA, Transportation Research Part A, 39(6), pp. 481–500.

28.

Krizek

K. J.

(2003) Residential relocation and changes in urban travel: does neighborhood-scale urban form matter?, Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(3), pp. 265–281.

29.

Walker

Srinivasan

Anderson

(2010) Modeling private car ownership in China, Transportation Research Record, 2193, pp. 76–84.

30.

Litman

(2005) Impacts of rail transit on the performance of a transportation system, Transportation Research Record, 1930, pp. 21–29.

31.

Lund

H. M.

Cervero

Willson

R. W.

(2006) A re-evaluation of travel behavior in California’s TODs, Journal of Architecture and Planning Research, 23(3), pp. 247–263.

32.

Matas

Raymond

J.-L.

Roig

J.-L.

(2009) Car ownership and access to jobs in Spain, Transportation Research Part A, 43(6), pp. 607–617.

33.

Mavoa

Witten

McCreanor

O’Sullivan

(2011) GIS based destination accessibility via public transit and walking in Auckland, New Zealand, Journal of Transport Geography, 20(1), pp. 15–22.

34.

Mokhtarian

P. L.

Cao

(2008) Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: a focus on methodologies, Transportation Research Part B, 42(3), pp. 204–228.

35.

Owen

Levinson

D. M.

(2013) Modeling the commute mode share of transit using continuous accessibility to jobs. Paper submitted to the Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

36.

Pinjari

A. R.

Pendyala

R. M.

Bhat

C. R.

Waddell

P. A.

(2011) Modeling the choice continuum: an integrated model of residential location, auto ownership, bicycle ownership, and commute tour mode choice decisions, Transportation, 38(6), pp. 933–958.

37.

Potoglou

Kanaroglou

P. S.

(2008) Modelling car ownership in urban areas: a case study of Hamilton, Canada, Journal of Transport Geography, 16(1), pp. 42–54.

38.

Pucher

Renee

(2003) Socioeconomics of urban travel: evidence from the 2001 NHTS, Transportation Quarterly, 57(3), pp. 49–77.

39.

Renee

(2005) Transit oriented development: measuring benefits, analyzing trends, and evaluating policy. Urban Planning and Policy Development Program, Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University.

40.

Rubin

T. A.

Moore

J. E.

Lee

(1999) Ten myths about US urban rail systems, Transport Policy, 6(1), pp. 57–73.

41.

Scheiner

Holz-Rau

(2013) Changes in travel mode use after residential relocation: a contribution to mobility biographies, Transportation, 40(2), pp. 431–458.

42.

Shoup

D. C.

(2005) The High Cost of Free Parking. Chicago, IL: Planners Press.

43.

Singleton

Straits

B. C.

(2005) Approaches to Social Research, 4th edn. New York: Oxford University Press.

44.

Snijders

Bosker

(1999) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage.

45.

Soltani

(2005) Exploring the impacts of built environments on vehicle ownership, Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 5, pp. 2151–2163.

46.

Sommer

(1997) A Practical Guide to Behavioral Research: Tools and Techniques, 4th edn. New York: Oxford University Press.

47.

Thompson

Brown

Bhattacharya

(2012) What really matters for increasing transit ridership: understanding the determinants of transit ridership demand in Broward County, Florida, Urban Studies, 49(15), pp. 3327–3345.

48.

Weinberger

Goetzke

(2010) Unpacking preference: how previous experience affects auto ownership in the United States, Urban Studies, 47(10), pp. 2111–2128.

49.

Zegras

(2010) The built environment and motor vehicle ownership and use: evidence from Santiago de Chile, Urban Studies, 47(8), pp. 1793–1817.

50.

Zhou

Kockelman

(2008) Self-selection in home choice: use of treatment effects in evaluating relationship between built environment and travel behavior, Transportation Research Record, 2077, pp. 54–61.