In the context of climate protection policies, this article addresses the post-carbon transitions driven by a few cities. It investigates the political dimension and multilevel character of these transitions: political, because they gain initial impetus from environmentalist associations, are maintained over time by uncommon political will and give rise to politically divergent transition paths; multilevel, because the upsurge of local climate policies results from the alliance between transnational municipal networks, international institutions and cities, with cross-influences between these levels. Additionally, the analysis of contrasted paths towards exiting fossil fuel followed by two ‘pilot’ cities (Hanover and Växjö), the conditions of their success and limitations encountered, highlights another component of this multilevel character: the weight of national or federal support for local climate action and of influence between political actions performed at different levels, which appear to broaden the scope of urban energy transitions.
AndonovaL.BetsillM.BulkeleyH. (2009) Transnational climate governance, Global Environmental Politics, 9(2), pp. 52–73.
2.
BlancN.EmelianoffC. (2008) L’investissement habitant des lieux et milieux de vie: une condition du renouvellement urbain? Etude européenne et prospective (France, Pays-Bas, Allemagne, Russie). Research report, PUCA, Université du Maine.
3.
BrennerN. (1999) Globalisation as reterritorialisation: the re-scaling of urban governance in the European Union, Urban Studies, 36(3), pp. 431–451.
4.
BulkeleyH. (2005) Reconfiguring environmental governance: towards a politics of scales and networks, Political Geography, 24, pp. 875–902.
5.
BulkeleyH.BetsillM. (2003) Cities and Climate Change: Urban Sustainability and Global Environmental Governance. London: Routledge.
6.
BulkeleyH.KernK. (2006) Local government and the governing of climate change in Germany and the UK, Urban Studies, 43(12), pp. 2237–2259.
City of Hanover (2008) 2008 Environment report: applying environment-related sustainability indicators.
9.
City of Växjö (2007) La stratégie climatique de Växjö.
10.
CollierU.LöfstedtR. (1997) Think globally, act locally? Local climate change and energy policies in Sweden and the UK, Global Environmental Change, 7(1), pp. 25–40.
11.
EckerbergK. (2001) Sweden: problems and prospects at the leading edge of LA21 implementations, in: LaffertyW. M. (Ed.) Sustainable Communities in Europe, pp. 15–39. London: Earthscan.
12.
EmelianoffC. (2006) Växjö, in: BordronD.PiéchaudJ.-P.LarrueC.EmelianoffC. (Eds) Politiques locales de transport et développement durable: research report PREDIT, pp. 144–152. Paris: Association 4D.
13.
EmelianoffC. (2007) Les villes européennes face au changement climatique: une rétrospective, Les Annales de la recherche urbaine, 103, pp. 159–169.
14.
EmelianoffC. (2008) Les villes, actrices d’une politique mondiale?, Pouvoirs locaux, 77, pp. 103–106.
15.
EmelianoffC.StegassyR. (2010) Les pionniers de la ville durable: récits d’acteurs, portraits de villes en Europe. Paris: Autrement.
16.
EmelianoffC.MorE.ChevalierJ. (2010) Les villes face à la transition énergétique: quelles politiques locales? Research report MEEDDM/ADEME, Université du Maine.
17.
GustavssonE.ElanderI.LundmarkM. (2009) Multilevel governance, networking cities, and the geography of climate-change mitigation: two Swedish examples, Environment and Planning C, 27(1), pp. 59–74.
HodsonM.MarvinS. (2009) ‘Urban ecological security’: a new urban paradigm?, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(1), pp. 193–215.
20.
HuberM. (1997) Leadership and unification: climate change policies in Germany, in: CollierU.LöfstedtR. (Eds) Cases in Climate Change Policy: Political Reality in the European Union, pp. 65–86. London: Earthscan.
21.
JamesS.LahtiT. (2004) The Natural Step for Communities: How Cities and Towns can Change to Sustainable Practices. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
22.
JohnP. (2000) The Europeanisation of sub-national governance, Urban Studies, 37(5/6), pp. 877–894.
23.
JordanA. (2008) The governance of sustainable development: taking stock and looking forwards, Environment and Planning C, 26(1), pp. 17–33.
24.
KitscheltH. P. (2009) Political opportunity structures and political protest: anti-nuclear movements in four democracies, British Journal of Political Science, 16, pp. 57–85.
25.
LaigleL. (2009) Vers des villes durables: La trajectoire de quatre agglomérations Européennes. Paris: PUCA Editions.
26.
LöfstedtR. (1997) Sweden: the dilemna of a proposed nuclear phase out, in: CollierU.LöfstedtR. (Eds) Cases in Climate Change Policy: Political Reality in the European Union, pp. 165–183. London: Earthscan.
27.
LundgvistL. J.BielA. (2007) From Kyoto to the Town Hall: Making International and National Climate Policy Work at the Local Level. London: Earthscan.
28.
NewellP. (2000) Climate for Change: Non-state Actors and the Global Politics of the Greenhouse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
PalmJ. (2006) Development of sustainable energy systems in Swedish municipalities: a matter of path dependency and power relations, Local Environment, 11(4), pp. 445–457.
30.
RohracherH.SpäthP. (forthcoming) The interplay of urban energy policy and socio-technical transitions: The eco-cities of Graz and Freiburg in retrospect, Urban Studies, DOI: 10.1177/0042098013500360.
31.
SirianniC.FriedlandL. (2001) Civic Innovation in America: Community Empowerment, Public Policy, and the Movement for Civic Renewal. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
32.
Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (2009) Local action on climate change. Swedish Experiences, Stockholm.
33.
WhileA.JonasA. E. G.GibbsD. (2010) From sustainable development to carbon control: eco-state restructuring and the politics of urban and regional development, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(1), pp. 76–94.
