Gender and its related variables affect school board and superintendent interrelationships.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aleshire, F. 1980. The dynamics of communication and trust as school board and superintendent prepare for public meeting. Ph.D. diss., Arizona State University, Tempe.
2.
Alvey, D. T. , and K. E. Underwood. 1985. When boards and superintendents clash, it's over the balance of school power. American School Board Journal172 (October): 21-25.
3.
Campbell, R. F. , L. L. Cunningham, R. O. Nystrand, and M. D. Usdan. 1985. The organization and control of American schools. 5th ed.Columbus, OH: Merrill.
4.
Charters, W. W., Jr. , and T. D. Jovick. 1981. The gender of principals and principal/teacher relations in elementary schools. In Educational policy and management: Sex differentials, edited by P. A. Schmuck, W. W. Charters, Jr., and R. O. Carlson. New York: Academic Press.
5.
Cioci, M. , V. E. Lee, and J. B. Smith. 1990. Teachers and principals: Gender-related perceptions of leadership and power in secondary schools. University of Michigan. Manuscript.
6.
Counts, G.1927. The social composition of school boards. Supplementary Educational Monographs, no. 33. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Crowson, R. L. , and V. C. Morris. 1990. The superintendency and school leadership. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association meeting, Boston, April.
8.
Eagly, A. H. , and B. Y. Johnson. 1990. Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin108:233-256.
9.
Freeman, J. L. , K. E. Underwood, and J. C. Fortune. 1991. What boards value: Exclusive school board survey. American School Board Journal178 (January): 32-36, 39.
10.
Gilligan, C.1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
11.
Glaser, B. G. , and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
12.
Guba, E. , and Y. Lincoln. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
Institute for Educational Leadership . 1986. School boards: Strengthening grass roots leadership. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
14.
Kask, K M. 1990. Training and development needs of school board members as perceived by school board members and superintendents in Ohio. Ph.D. diss., Ohio State University.
15.
Lakoff, R.1975. Language and woman s place. New York: Harper & Row.
16.
Levinson, R. M. 1982. Administrative task orientation of school principals. Ph.D. diss., University of California, Santa Barbara.
17.
Luckett, R. , K. E. Underwood, and J. C. Fortune. 1987a. How men and women board members match up. American School Board Journal173 (January): 26, 41.
18.
Luckett, R. , K. E. Underwood, and J. C. Fortune. 1987b. Men and women make discernibly different contributions to their boards. American School Board Journal173 (January): 21-23.
19.
Marshall, S. A. , and M. Helter. 1983. A female leadership style could revolutionize school government. American School Board Journal170 (August): 31-32.
20.
McIntosh, P. 1983. Stages of curricular revision. Paper presented at Claremont College Conference on Women's Studies, Claremont, CA, February.
21.
Mullins, C.1972. The plight of the boardwoman. American School Board Journal159 (January): 27-32.
22.
Ortiz, F. I. , and C. Marshall. 1988. Women in educational administration. In Handbook of research on educational administration, edited by N. Boyan.New York: Longman.
23.
Pitner, N.1981. Hormones and harems: Are the activities of superintending different for a woman?In Educational policy and management: Sex differentials, edited by P. A. Schmuck, W. W. Charters, Jr., and R. O. Carlson.New York: Academic Press.
24.
Rosener, J. B.1990. Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review68 (November/December): 119-125.
25.
Schmuck, P. A. 1987a. Gender: A relevant concept for educational leadership. Paper presented at the National Graduate Student Research Seminar in Educational Administration, University Council for Educational Administration, Washington, DC, April 24.
26.
Schmuck, P. A. , ed. 1987b. Women educators. Albany: State University of New York Press.
27.
Schuster, M. , and S. Van Dyne. 1984. Placing women in the liberal arts: Stages of curriculum transformation. Harvard Educational Review34(4): 443-457.
28.
Shakeshaft, C.1988. Women in educational administration: Implications for training. In Leaders for America's schools, edited by D. E. Grifiths, R. T. Stout, and P. B. Forsyth. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
29.
Stout, R. T. , and M. Tallerico. 1988. Becoming and being a school superintendent. Unpublished data.
30.
Tallerico, M.1989. The dynamics of superintendent-school board relationships. Urban Education24(2): 215-232.
31.
Tallerico, M.1991a. Rethinking school board member socialization. Manuscript submitted for publication.
32.
Tallerico, M.1991b. School board member development: Implications for policy and practice. Manuscript submitted for publication.
33.
Tannen, D.1990. You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Ballantine.
34.
Tetreault, M. K.1985. Feminist phase theory: An experience-derived evaluation model. Journal of Higher Education56(4): 364-384.
35.
Underwood, K. , D. T. Alvey, and J. C. Fortune. 1987. Board member survey: Men and women are different. American School Board Journal174 (January): 21-26.
