Enculturation of assistant principals tends to result in "custodial, nonrisk-taking, noninstructional" orientations of potential educational leaders.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AUSTIN, B. D. and H. L. BROWN (1970) Report of the Assistant Principalship, Vol. 3: The Study of the Secondary School Principalship. Washington, DC: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
2.
CROFT, J. C. and J. R. MORTON (1977) "The assistant principal: In quandry or comfort?" Presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, April.
3.
GREENFIELD, W. (1985) "Studies of the assistant principalship: toward new avenues of inquiry."Education and Urban Society18, 1: 7-23.
4.
GREENFIELD, W. , C. MARSHALL and D. REED (forthcoming) "Experience in the vice principalship: preparation for leading schools?"Amer. J. of Education.
5.
MARSHALL, C. (1985) "Professional shock: the enculturation of the assistant principal."Education and Urban Society18, 1: 28-58.
6.
PETERSON, K. , C. MARSHALL, and T. GRIER (1986) "The assistant principals' academy: technical training and socialization of future leaders." (unpublished)
7.
REED, D. B. and A. H. HIMMLER (1985) "The work of the secondary assistant principalship: a field study."Education and Urban Society18, 1: 59-84.
8.
VAN MAANAN, J. and E. H. SHEIN (1979) "Toward a theory of organizational socialization," pp. 209-264Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 1; Greenwich, CT: JAI.
