The direct instruction pattern is an effective teaching style for a particular population of children, although more testing is yet needed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abt Associates (1977) Education as Experimentation: A Planned Variation, Model, vol. 4. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
2.
ANDERSON, L. , C. EVERTSON and J. BROPHY (1979) "An experimental study of effective teaching in first-grade reading groups."Elementary School J.7 (Spring): 7-33.
3.
BARKER, R. G. (1963) The Stream of Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
4.
BECKER, W. C. and S. CARNINE (1978) "Direct instruction-a behavior theory model for comprehensive educational intervention with the disadvantaged. Presented at the Eighth Symposium on Behavior Modification, Caracas, February.
5.
BECKER, W. C. and S. ENGLEMANN (1978) Analysis of Achievement Data on Six Cohorts of Low-Income Children from 20 School Districts in the University of Oregon Direct Instruction Follow Through Model. Follow Through Project, Technical Report 78-1. Eugene: University of Oregon.
6.
BERMAN, P. and M. W. McLOUGHLIN (1975) Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, vol. 4. The Findings in Review. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
7.
CRUICKSHANK, D. R. (1976) "Synthesis of selected recent research in teacher effects."J. of Teacher Education27 (Spring): 57-60.
8.
BROPHY, J. E. and C. M. EVERTSON (1976) Learning from Teaching. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
DUNKIN, M. J. and B. J. BIDDLE (1974) The Study of Teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
10.
GAGE, N. L. (1976) "A factorially designed experiment on teacher structuring, soliciting, and reacting."J. of Teacher Education27 (Spring): 35-38.
11.
GALL, M. D. , B. A. WARDD. C. BERLINERL. S. CAHENK. A. CROWNJ. D. ELASHOFFG. C. STANTON and P. H. WINNE (1975) The Effect of Teacher Use of Questioning Techniques on Student Achievement and Attitude. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.
12.
GOOD, T. L. and D. A. GROUWS (1975) Process Product Relationships in Fourth Grade Mathematics Classes. Columbia: College of Education, University of Missouri.
13.
HOUSE, E. R. , G. V GLASSL. D. McLEAN and D. E. WALKER (1977) No Simple Answer: Critique of the Follow Through Evaluation. Urbana: University of Illinois.
14.
McDONALD, F. J. (1976) "Report on phase II of the beginning teacher evaluation study."J. of Teacher Education27 (Spring): 39-42.
15.
ROSENSHINE, B. (1976) "Recent research on teaching behaviors and student achievement."J. of Teacher Education27 (Spring): 61-64.
16.
ROSENSHINE, B. and D. C. BERLINER (1978) "Academic engaged time."British J. of Teacher Education4: 3-16.
17.
ROSENSHINE, B. V. and N. FURST (1971) "Research on teacher performance criteria," in B. E. Smith (ed.) Research on Teacher Education: A Symposium. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18.
SOAR, R. S. (1976) An Integrative Approach to Classroom Learning. ED 033 749. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.
19.
SOAR, R. S. (1974) Follow-Through Classroom Process Measurement and Pupil Growth (1970-71), Final Report. Gainesville: College of Education, University of Florida.
20.
SOLOMON, D. and A. J. KENDALL (1976) Final Report on Individual Characteristics and Children's Performance in Varied Educational Settings. Chicago: Spencer Foundation Project.
21.
STALLINGS, J. A. and D. KASKOWITZ (1974) Follow-Through Classroom Evaluation, 1972-73. Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research Institute.
22.
TIKUNOFF, W. , D. C. BERLINER and R. C. RIST (1975) An Ethnographic Study of the Forty Classrooms of the Beginning Teacher Evaluation Study Known Sample. Technical Report 75-10-5. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.
