We examined the Naglieri General Ability Test: Verbal, Nonverbal and Quantitative scores across urban and suburban settings. The samples included children aged 4–17 years matched to the U.S. population based on gender, race, ethnicity, geographic region, and parental education. Few differences were found on the Naglieri General Ability Tests—Verbal, Nonverbal and Quantitative. These findings suggest that these tests may have utility for equitable identification of students from diverse backgrounds for gifted education.
AckermanP. L. (2022). Intelligence process vs. content and academic performance: A trip through a house of mirrors. Journal of Intelligence, 10(4), 128. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/jintelligence10040128
2.
American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. AERA.
3.
BealB. B. (1987). A study to identify items on the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills which are associated with racial or ethnic group membership; to determine possible relationships between instructional needs and these items; and to develop recommendation strategies (ERIC No. ED291814). Denver Public Schools. ERIC Document
4.
BensonN. F.BeaujeanA. A.McGillR. J.DombrowskiS. C. (2018). Revisiting Carroll's survey of factor-analytic studies: Implications for the clinical assessment of intelligence. Psychological assessment, 30(8), 1028–1038. 10.1037/pas0000556
5.
BinetA.SimonT. (1916). The development of intelligence in children (The Binet–Simon Scale) (E. S. Kite, Trans.). Williams & Wilkins Co.
6.
BreslauN.ChilcoatH. D.SusserE. S.MatteT.LiangK.-Y.PetersonE. L. (2001). Stability and change in children's intelligence quotient scores: A comparison of two socioeconomically disparate communities. American Journal of Epidemiology, 154(8), 711–717. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/154.8.711
7.
BrullesD.BrownK. L. (2018). A teacher’s guide to flexible grouping & collaboration. Free Spirit Publishing.
8.
BrullesD.LansdowneK.NaglieriJ. A. (2022). Understanding and using the Naglieri general ability tests: A call to equity in gifted education. Free Spirit Publishing.
9.
BrullesD.WinebrennerS. (2019). The cluster grouping handbook: How to challenge gifted students and improve achievement for all. Free Spirit Publishing.
10.
CanivezG. L. (2008). Orthogonal higher order factor structure of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales–fifth edition for children and adolescents. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(4), 533–541. 10.1037/a0012884
11.
CanivezG. L.McGillR. J. (2016). Factor structure of the Differential Ability Scales–Second Edition: Exploratory and hierarchical factor analyses with the core subtests. Psychological Assessment, 28(11), 1475–1488. 10.1037/pas0000279
12.
CastellanoJ. A.FrazierA. D. (2011). Special populations in gifted education: Understanding our most able students from diverse backgrounds. Prufrock Press.
13.
DombrowskiS. C.McGillR. J.CanivezG. L. (2017). Exploratory and hierarchical factor analysis of the WJ-IV Cognitive at school age. Psychological Assessment, 29(4), 394–407. 10.1037/pas0000350
14.
FordD. Y. (2010). Reversing underachievement among gifted Black students: Promising practices and programs. Prufrock Press.
15.
FordD. Y.GranthamT. C.WhitingG. W. (2008). Culturally and linguistically diverse students in gifted education: Recruitment and retention issues. Exceptional Children, 74(3), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807400302
16.
FreemanF. S. (1955). Theory and practice of psychological testing (Rev. ed.). Henry Holt.
KnoesterM.AuW. (2017). Standardized testing and school segregation: like tinder for fire?Race Ethnicity and Education, 20(1), 1–14. 10.1080/13613324.2015.1121474
19.
KovacsK.ConwayA. R. A. (2019). A unified cognitive/differential approach to human intelligence: Implications for IQ testing. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(3), 255–272. 10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.05.003
20.
LuriaA. R. (1982). Cognitive development. In Its Cultural and Social Foundations. Harvard University Press.
21.
MatarazzoJ. D. (1972). Wechsler’s measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence (5th ed.). Williams & Wilkins.
22.
McCallumR. S.BrackenB. A.WassermanJ. D. (2001). Essentials of psychological assessment series. Essentials of nonverbal assessment. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
23.
MehtaM. (2024). Breaking into the playground of privilege: An analysis of GT program identification procedures. Journal of Student Research, 13(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v13i3.7404
24.
NaglieriJ. A. (1997). Naglieri nonverbal ability test. The Psychological Corporation.
25.
NaglieriJ. A. (2008). Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (2nd ed.). Pearson.
26.
NaglieriJ. A. (2016). Naglieri nonverbal ability test—third edition (NNAT3). Pearson.
27.
NaglieriJ. A. (2021). Naglieri general ability test: Nonverbal. Multi-Health Systems.
28.
NaglieriJ. A.BrullesD. (2021). Naglieri general ability test: Verbal. Multi-Health Systems.
29.
NaglieriJ. A.BrullesD.LansdowneK. (2021). Naglieri general ability tests technical manual. Multi-Health Systems Inc.
30.
NaglieriJ. A.FordD. Y. (2003). Addressing underrepresentation of gifted minority children using the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620304700206
31.
NaglieriJ. A.FordD. Y. (2005). Increasing minority children's participation in gifted classes using the NNAT: A response to lohman. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(1), 29–36. 10.1177/001698620504900104
32.
NaglieriJ. A.LansdowneK. (2021). Naglieri general ability test: Quantitative. Multi-Health Systems.
33.
NaglieriJ. A.RonningM. E. (2000a). Comparison of white, African-American, Hispanic, and Asian children on the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test. Psychological Assessment, 12(3), 328–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.12.3.328
34.
NaglieriJ. A.RonningM. E. (2000b). The relationship between general ability using the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT) and Stanford Achievement Test (SAT) Reading achievement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 18(3), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428290001800303Posit team. 2024
35.
National Association for Gifted Children. (2015). 2014-2015 State of the states in gifted education.
OtisA. S. (1918). An absolute point scale for the group measurement of intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 9(5), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0072885
38.
PetersS. J.MatthewsM. S.McBeeM. T.McCoachD. B. (2019). Beyond gifted education: Designing and implementing advanced academic programs. Routledge.
39.
Posit Team. (2024). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. Posit Software, PBC. http://www.posit.co/
40.
RavenJ.RavenJ. (2003). Raven progressive matrices. In McCallumR. S. (Ed.), Handbook of Nonverbal Assessment (pp. 223–237). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. 10.1007/978-1-4615-0153-4_11
41.
R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
42.
Riverside Insights. (2017). Iowa Assessments™: Technical summary and test specifications (Forms E and F). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
43.
SelvamenanM.PaolozzaA.SolomonJ.NaglieriJ. A. (2024). A pilot study of race, ethnic, gender, and parental education level differences on the Naglieri general ability tests: Verbal, nonverbal, and quantitative. Psychology in the Schools, 61(12), 4705–4731. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23304
44.
WarneR. T.BurninghamC. (2019). Spearman’s g found in 31 non-western nations: Strong evidence that g is a universal phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 145(3), 237–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000184
45.
WechslerD. (1939). The measurement of adult intelligence. Williams & Wilkins.
