The current study examined the association between home–school dissonance and academic cheating among 344 high school juniors and seniors at two urban high schools. Students completed two subscales of the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scale (PALS) and one subscale of the Academic Motivation Scale (AMS). Analyses revealed that home–school dissonance significantly predicted both amotivation and academic cheating. In addition, results revealed that amotivation was a significant mediator of the association between home–school dissonance and academic cheating. Limitations and future research directions are discussed.
AgnewR. (1992). Foundation of a general strain theory. Criminology, 30, 47-87.
2.
AmesC. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
3.
AndermanE. M.GriesingerT.WesterfieldG. (1998). Motivation and cheating during early adolescent. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 84-93.
4.
AndermanE. M.MaehrM. L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research, 64, 287-309.
5.
AndermanE. R.MidgleyC. (2004). Changes in self-reported academic cheating across the transition from middle school to high school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 499-517.
6.
AndermanE. M.MurdockT. B. (2007). The psychology of academic cheating. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
7.
ArunkumarR.MidgleyC.UrdanT. (1999). Perceiving high or low home-school dissonance: Longitudinal effects on adolescent emotional and academic well-being. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 9, 441-466.
8.
AthanasouJ. A.OlasehindeO. (2002). Male and female differences in self-report cheating. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 8(5). Retrieved from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=5
9.
BairdJ. S. (1980). Current trends in college cheating. Psychology in the Schools, 17, 515-522.
10.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
11.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
CalabreseR. L.CochranJ. T. (1990). The relationship of alienation to cheating among a simple of American adolescents. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 23, 65-72.
13.
CizekG. J. (1999). Cheating on tests: How to do it, detect it, and prevent it. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
CokleyK. O.BernardN.CunninghamD.MotoikeJ. (2001). A psychometric investigation of the Academic Motivation Scale using a United States sample. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 109-119.
16.
DavisS. F.GroverC. A.BeckerA. H.McGregorL. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: Prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19, 16-20.
17.
DeciE.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
18.
DeciE.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
19.
DweckC. S.LeggettE. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
20.
EvansE. D.CraigD. (1990). Adolescent cognitions for academic cheating as a function of grade level and achievement status. Journal of Adolescent Research, 5, 325-345.
21.
EvansE. D.CraigD.MietzelG. (1993). Adolescents’ cognitions and attributions for academic cheating: A cross-national study. The Journal of Psychology, 127, 585-602.
22.
FinnK. V.FroneM. R. (2004). Academic performance and cheating: Moderating role of school identification and self-efficacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(3), 116-122.
23.
FrazierP. A.TixA. P.BarronK. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 115-134.
24.
FritzM. S.MacKinnonD. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18, 233-239.
25.
GayG. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
26.
GrahamM. A.MondayJ.O’BrienK.SteffenS. (1994). Cheating at small colleges: An examination of student and faculty attitudes and behaviors. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 255-260.
27.
JensenL. A.ArnettJ. J.FeldmanS. S.CauffmanE. (2002). It’s wrong, but everybody does it: Academic dishonesty among high school and college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 209-228.
28.
KerkvlietJ.SigmundC. L. (1999). Can we control cheating in the classroom?Journal of Economic Education, 30, 331-343.
29.
KumarR. (2006). Students’ experiences of home-school dissonance: The role of school academic culture and perceptions of classroom goal structures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 253-279.
30.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31.
MacKinnonD. P.FairchildA. J.FritzM. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593-614.
32.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.HoffmanJ. M.WestS. G.SheetsV. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variables effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104.
33.
MallinckrodtB.AbrahamW. T.WeiM.RussellD. W. (2006). Advances in testing the statistical significance of mediation effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 372-378.
34.
McCabeD. L. (1999). Academic dishonesty among high school students. Adolescence, 34, 681-687.
McCabeD. L.TrevinoL. K. (1993). Academia dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 522-538.
37.
McCabeD. L.TrevinoL. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academia dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38, 379-396.
38.
MichaelsJ. W.MietheT. D. (1989). Applying theories of deviance to academic cheating. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 870-885.
39.
MidgleyC.MaehrM. L.HrudaL. Z.AndermanE.AndermanL.FreemanK. E.UrdanT. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
40.
MillerA. D.MurdockT. B. (2007). Modeling latent true scores to determine the utility of aggregate student perceptions as classroom indicators in HLM: The case of classroom goal structures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 83-104.
41.
MurdockT. B.AndermanE. M. (2006). Motivational perspectives on student cheating: Toward an integrated model of academic dishonesty. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 129-145.
42.
MurdockT. B.HaleN. M.WeberM. J. (2001). Predictors of cheating among early adolescents: Academic and social motivations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 96-115.
43.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2003). Do children’s attention processes mediate the link between family predictors and school readiness?Developmental Psychology, 39, 581-593.
44.
PhelanP.DavidsonA. L.CaoH. T. (1991). Students’ multiple worlds: Negotiating the boundaries of family, peer, and school cultures. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 22, 223-249.
45.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.
46.
SchabF. (1991). Schooling without learning: Thirty years of cheating in high school. Adolescence, 26, 839-847.
47.
ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.
48.
SitrenA. H.ApplegateB. K. (2007). Testing the deterrent effects of personal and vicarious experience with punishment and punishment avoidance. Deviant Behavior, 28(1), 29-55
49.
SobelM. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In LeinhartS. (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
50.
StaffordM. C.WarrM. (1993). A reconceptualization of general and specific deterrence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(2), 123-135.
51.
SullivanA. (2006). Students as rational decision-makers: The question of beliefs and attitudes. London Review of Education, 4, 271-290.
52.
TaylorL.PogrebinM.DodgeM. (2006). Advanced placement-advanced pressures: Academic dishonesty among elite high school students. Educational Studies, 33, 403-422.
53.
TibbetsS. G.MyersD. L. (1999). Low self-control, rational choice, and student test cheating. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 179-200.
54.
TylerK. M.BoykinA. W.MillerO. A.HurleyE. A. (2006). Cultural values in the home and school experiences of low-income African American students. Social Psychology of Education, 9, 363-380.
55.
VallerandR. J.BissonnetteR. (1992). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational styles as predictors of behavior: A prospective study. Journal of Personality, 60, 599-620.
56.
VallerandR. J.PelletierL. G.BlaisM. R.BriereN. M.SenecalC.VallieresE. F. (1993). On the assessment of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education: Evidence on the concurrent and construct validity of the Academic Motivation Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 159-172.
57.
VowellP. R.ChenJ. (2004). Predicting academic misconduct: A comparative test of four sociological explanations. Sociological Inquiry, 74, 226-249.
58.
WhitleyB. E. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education, 39, 235-274.
59.
WhitleyB. E.NelsonA. B.JonesC. J. (1999). Gender differences in cheating attitudes and classroom cheating behavior: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 41, 657-680.
60.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
