Special education and dual language/bilingual education (DLBE) programs originated to protect educational rights for students with disabilities and multilingual students. However, these structures require categorizing learners through standardized testing, which can reinforce ableist and racist practices. This ethnographic and discourse-analytic study examines educators’ perceptions of fourth-grade students’ language practices within an urban K-8 bilingual program as they inhabit an institutional perceiving subject position. Rooted in critical perspectives on race, language, and disability, findings suggest that all students were subjected to the white normative gaze, highlighting structural oppression in DLBE and special education while exploring implications for urban schooling contexts.
AggarwalU. (2016). The ideological architecture of whiteness as property in educational policy. Educational Policy, 30(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904815616486
2.
AlfaroC.BartoloméL. I. (2018). Preparing ideologically clear bilingual teachers to recognize linguistic geniuses. In BerrizB. R.WagerA. C.PoeyV. M. (Eds.), Art as a way of talking for emergent bilingual youth: A foundation for literacy in preK-12 schools (pp. 44–59). Routledge.
3.
AmantiC. (2019). Is native-speakerism impacting the dual language immersion teacher shortage?Multilingua, 38(6), 675–686. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2018-0011
4.
AndrewsE. E.Forber-PrattA. J.MonaL. R.LundE. M.PilarskiC. R.BalterR. (2019). #Saytheword: A disability culture commentary on the erasure of “disability”. Rehabilitation Psychology, 64(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000258
5.
AnnammaS. A. (2018). The pedagogy of pathologization: Dis/abled girls of color in the school-prison nexus. Routledge.
6.
AnnammaS. A.ConnorD.FerriB. (2013). Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2012.730511
7.
AnnammaS. A.WinnM. (2019). Transforming our mission: Animating teacher education through intersectional justice. Theory into Practice, 58(4), 318–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1626618
8.
AshtonJ. R. (2016). Keeping up with the class: A critical discourse analysis of teacher interactions in a co-teaching context. Classroom Discourse, 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2015.1077717
Baker-BellA. (2020). Linguistic justice: Black language, literacy, identity, and pedagogy. Routledge.
11.
Barillas ChonD. W. (2024). K’iche’, Mam, and Nahua migrant youth navigating colonial codes of power. Urban Education, 59(4), 1224–1251. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859211073902
12.
BeratanG. D. (2006). Institutionalizing inequity: Ableism, racism and IDEA 2004. Disability Studies Quarterly, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v26i2.682
13.
BlaiseJ. G. (2018). The effects of high-stakes accountability measures on students with limited English proficiency. Urban Education, 53(9), 1154–1181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915613549
ButtaroA.CatsambisS. (2019). Ability grouping in the early grades: Long-term consequences for educational equity in the United States. Teachers College Record, 121(2), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912100204
16.
ChaparroS. E.SchisselJ. L.KlassenC. (2021). The construction of bilingual abilities through monoglossic literacy assessments. Journal of Multilingual Theories and Practices, 2(2), 154–179. https://doi.org/10.1558/jmtp.19688
17.
Cioè-PeñaM. (2017). The intersectional gap: How bilingual students in the United States are excluded from inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1296032
18.
Cioè-PeñaM. (2020). Raciolinguistics and the education of emergent bilinguals labeled as disabled. The Urban Review, 53, 443–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-020-00581-z
19.
Cioè-PeñaM. (2021). Dual language and the erasure of emergent bilinguals labeled as disabled (EBLADs). In FloresN.TsengA.SubtireluN. (Eds.), Bilingualism for all?: Raciolinguistic perspectives on dual language education in the United States (pp. 63–87). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800410053-005
20.
De HouwerA. (2023). The danger of bilingual–monolingual comparisons in applied psycholinguistic research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 44(3), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271642200042X
21.
DoverA. G. (2022). Your compliance will not protect you: Agency and accountability in urban teacher preparation. Urban Education, 57(6), 975–1007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085918795020
22.
EvansM.TeasdaleR. M.Gannon-SlaterN.LondeP. G. L.CrenshawH. L.GreeneJ. C.SchwandtT. A. (2019). How did that happen? Teachers’ explanations for low test scores. Teachers College Record, 121(2), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912100202
23.
FerriB. A.ConnorD. J. (2006). Reading resistance: Discourses of exclusion in desegregation & inclusion debates. Peter Lang.
FloresN.LewisM. C. (2022). “False positives, reentry programs, and long term English learners”: Undoing dichotomous frames in U.S. language education policy. Equity & Excellence in Education, 55(3), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2022.2047408
26.
FloresN.LewisM. C.PhuongJ. (2018). Raciolinguistic chronotopes and the education of Latinx students: Resistance and anxiety in a bilingual school. Language & Communication, 62(Part A), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.06.002
27.
FloresN.PhuongJ.VenegasK. M. (2020). “Technically an EL”: The production of raciolinguistic categories in a dual language school. TESOL Quarterly, 54(3), 629–651. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.577
28.
FloresN.SchisselJ. L. (2014). Dynamic bilingualism as the norm: Envisioning a heteroglossic approach to standards-based reform. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 454–479. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tesq.182
29.
FlorianL. (2019). On the necessary co-existence of special and inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(7-8), 691–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1622801
30.
FulcherG. (1989). Disabling policies? A comparative approach to education policy and disability. The Falmer Press.
31.
GadsdenV. L.Dixon-RománE. J. (2017). “Urban” schooling and “urban” families: The role of context and place. Urban Education, 52(4), 431–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916652189
32.
GernsbacherM. A. (2017). Editorial perspective: The use of person-first language in scholarly writing may accentuate stigma. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(7), 859–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12706
33.
GilmoreP. (2011). Language ideologies, ethnography, and ethnology: New directions in anthropological approaches to language policy. In McCartyT. L. (Ed.), Ethnography and language policy (pp. 121–127). Routledge.
34.
Gomez-NajarroJ. (2023). Identity-blind intervention: Examining teachers’ attention to social identity in the context of response to intervention. Urban Education, 58(4), 654–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085919860561
HennerJ.RobinsonO. (2023). Unsettling languages, unruly bodyminds: A crip linguistics manifesto. Journal of Critical Study of Communication and Disability, 1(1), 7–37. https://doi.org/10.48516/jcscd_2023vol1iss1.4
38.
Hill CollinsP. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Unwin Hyman.
39.
Hinnant-CrawfordB. N. (2023). Legislating instruction in urban schools: Unintended consequences of accountability policy on teacher-reported classroom goal structures. Urban Education, 58(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085919838004
40.
HoffmanJ. W.MartinJ. L. (2023). Abolitionist teaching in an urban district: A literacy coup. Urban Education, 58(9), 2118–2145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920943937
41.
HornbergerN. H.JohnsonD. C. (2007). Slicing the onion ethnographically: Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 509–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00083.x
42.
HouL.NamboodiripadS. (2024). Manifesting a crip linguistic theory through a critical disability raciolinguistic perspective. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/mh38t
KangasS. E. N. (2021). “Is it language or disability?”: An ableist and monolingual filter for English learners with disabilities. TESOL Quarterly, 55(3), 673–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3029
45.
KannoY.Rios-AguilarC.BunchG. C. (2024). English learners? Emergent bilinguals? Multilingual learners?: Goals, contexts, and consequences in labeling students. TESOL Journal, 15(3), e979. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.797
46.
KavanaghK. M.Fisher-AriT. R. (2020). Curricular and pedagogical oppression: Contradictions within the juggernaut accountability trap. Educational Policy, 34(2), 283–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904818755471
47.
KeefeE. S. (2022). From detractive to democratic: The duty of teacher education to disrupt structural ableism and reimagine disability. Teachers College Record, 124(3), 115–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681221086994
LiG.QinK. (2024). Supporting and advocating for immigrant and refugee students and families in America’s urban schools: Educators’ agency and practices in everyday instruction. Urban Education, 59(2), 600–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859221082671
53.
Lippi-GreenR. (2012). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States (2nd ed.). Routledge.
54.
Martin-JonesM.da Costa CabralI. (2018). The critical ethnographic turn in research on language policy and planning. In TollefsonJ. W.Pérez-MilansM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language policy and planning (pp. 71–92). Oxford University Press.
55.
MenkenK.GarcíaO. (2010). Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers. Routledge.
PalmerD.HendersonK.WallD.ZúñigaC. E.BerthelsenS. (2016). Team teaching among mixed messages: Implementing two-way dual language bilingual education at third grade in Texas. Language Policy, 15(2016), 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-015-9361-3
59.
PhuongJ. (2017). Disability and language ideologies in education policy. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 32(1), 47–66. https://wpel.gse.upenn.edu/s2017#phuong
PhuongJ.BialkaC. S.MacDonaldM. (2021). Developing critically inclusive, anti-ableist organizations. In PakK.RavitchS. M. (Eds.), Critical leadership praxis for educational and social change (pp. 123–136). Teachers College Press.
Piepzna-SamarasinhaL. L. (2018). Care work: Dreaming disability justice. Arsenal Pulp Press.
64.
PozaL. E.ViescaK. M. (2020). Testing and ideology: Policy debates about literacy assessments for Colorado’s bilingual students. Journal of Education Policy, 35(4), 556–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2018.1511831
65.
RazfarA.RumenappJ. C.TorresZ. (2023). Administering language: The language ideological voices of urban school administrators in urban education. Urban Education, 58(10), 2462–2490. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920959136
66.
RogersR. (2011). Critical approaches to discourse analysis in educational research. In RogersR. (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (2nd ed., pp. 1–20). Routledge.
67.
RosaJ. D. (2016). Standardization, racialization, languagelessness: Raciolinguistic ideologies across communicative contexts. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 26(2), 162–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12116
68.
RosaJ.FloresN. (2017). Unsettling race and language: Toward a raciolinguistic perspective. Language in Society, 46(5), 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000562
69.
SandahlC. (2003). Queering the crip or cripping the queer?: Intersections of queer and crip identities in solo autobiographical performance. GLQ: A Journal of Gay and Lesbian Studies, 9(1–2), 25–56. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-9-1-2-25
SchisselJ. L. (2019). Social consequences of testing for language-minoritized bilinguals in the United States. Multilingual Matters.
73.
Sins Invalid. (2019). Skin, tooth, and bone: The basis of movement is our people (2nd ed.). Sins Invalid.
74.
SmithP. (2008). Cartographies of eugenics and special education: A history of the (ab)normal. In GabelS.DanforthS. (Eds.), Disability and the politics of education: An international reader (pp. 417–432). Peter Lang.
75.
SprattM. (2005). Washback and the classroom: The implications for teaching and learning of studies of washback from exams. Language Teaching Research, 9(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr152oa
76.
SterponiL. (2007). Clandestine interactional reading: Intertextuality and double-voicing under the desk. Linguistics and Education, 18(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2007.04.001
77.
TuckE.YangK. W. (2018). Toward what justice? Describing diverse dreams of justice in education. Routledge.
78.
VoulgaridesC. K. (2018). Does compliance matter in special education? IDEA and the hidden inequities of practice. Teachers College Press.
79.
WelshR. O.SwainW. A. (2020). (Re)defining urban education: A conceptual review and empirical exploration of the definition of urban education. Educational Researcher, 49(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20902822
80.
WilliamsA.Richards-SchusterK. (2023). Teaching transformation: Fostering critical awareness through transformative justice organizing frameworks. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2023(179), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20547
81.
WooA.WolfeR. L.SteinerE. D.DoanS.LawrenceR. A.BerdieL.GreerL.GittensA. D.SchwartzH. L., & RAND Education and Labor. (2022). Walking a fine line—Educators’ views on politicized topics in schooling: Findings from the state of the American teacher and state of the American principal surveys. Research Report. RR-A1108-5. RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA1108-5
82.
YuB. (2015). Bilingualism as conceptualized and bilingualism as lived: A critical examination of the monolingual socialization of a child with autism in a bilingual family. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(2), 424–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2625-0
