Research has shown that youth participation in school decision-making is hindered by both racism and adultism. However, less is known about the implications of intersecting forms of injustice for youth leadership to advance social justice. We address this area using the lens of intersectionality in a qualitative study of youth leadership at a school in an urban area. Our findings point to the complexity of representation in youth leadership, considering the intersections of not only age and race but also disability and language. Ultimately, our research indicates that efforts to increase youth influence should consider intersectionality.
Anderson-LevittK. M. (2006). Ethnography. In GreenJ. L.CamilliG.ElmoreP. B. (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 279–296). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; Published for the American Educational Research Association. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0634/2005054221-d.html
2.
AnnammaS. A.ConnorD.FerriB. (2013). Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2012.730511
3.
AnzaldúaG. (1987). Borderlands: The new mestiza = La frontera (1st ed.). Spinsters/Aunt Lute.
4.
AronsonB.BovedaM. (2017). The intersection of white supremacy and the education industrial complex: An analysis of #BlackLivesMatter and the criminalization of people with disabilities. Journal of Educational Controversy, 12(1), 1–20. https://cedar.wwu.edu/jec/vol12/iss1/6/
5.
BertrandM.BrooksM. D.DomínguezA. D. (2020). Challenging adultism: Centering youth as educational decision makers. Urban Education, 58(10), 2570–2597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920959135.
6.
BertrandM.RodelaK. C. (2017). A framework for re-thinking educational leadership in the margins: Implications for social justice leadership preparation. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 31(1), 10–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775117739414
7.
BestK. L.MortensonW. B.Lauzière-FitzgeraldZ.SmithE. M. (2022). Language matters! The long-standing debate between identity-first language and person first language. Assistive Technology, 34(2), 127–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2022.2058315
8.
BettencourtG. M. (2018). Embracing problems, processes, and contact zones: Using youth participatory action research to challenge adultism. Action Research, 18(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750318789475
9.
BrennerM. E. (2006). Interviewing in educational research. In GreenJ. L.CamilliG.ElmoreP. B. (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 357–370). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; Published for the American Educational Research Association. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0634/2005054221-d.html
ClayK. L.TurnerD. C. (2021). “Maybe you should try it this way instead”: Youth activism amid managerialist subterfuge. American Educational Research Journal, 58(2), 386–419. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831221993476
12.
CollinsP. H. (1990). Black feminist thought in the matrix of domination. In Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (pp. 221–238). Unwin Hyman.
ConnerJ.OberC. N.BrownA. (2016). The politics of paternalism: Adult and youth perspectives on youth voice in public policy. Teachers College Record, 118(8), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811611800805
15.
CooperB. (2016). Intersectionality. In DischL.HawkesworthM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of feminist theory (pp. 385–406). Oxford University Press.
16.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist policies. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.
17.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
18.
DavisK. (2014). Intersectionality as critical methodology. In LykkeN. (Ed.), Writing academic texts differently: Intersectional feminist methodologies and the playful art of writing (pp. 17–29). Taylor & Francis Group.
19.
DomínguezA. D.BertrandM. (2023). Where are the co-coconspirators?: Examining performative youth allyship by educational leaders in K-12 schools. The Urban Review, 55(5), 559–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-023-00661-w
20.
DomínguezA. D.CasanovaC. R. (2023). School leader Lotería: How school educators respond to Latinx student performances of (their) lived experiences with racism in school. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 19(3), 304–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/19427751231175926
21.
DomínguezA. D.ClementV.BertrandM. (2021). The bind of unilateral power dynamics and youth voice in school politics. Educational Policy, 36(1), 169–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048211059196
22.
DuaneA. (2023). “Showing the good and bad together”: A participatory exploration of strengths and school-based trauma with Black elementary youth. Urban Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859231175673
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.
26.
EricksonF. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In WittrockM. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119–161). Macmillan.
27.
FloresN.RosaJ. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.149
28.
GarciaL. W. (2023). Youth lighting the path to emancipatory education. In RodelaK. C.BertrandM. (Eds.), Centering youth, family, and community in school leadership: Case studies for educational equity and justice (pp. 80–95). Routledge.
29.
GonzálezT.ArtilesA. J. (2015). Reframing venerable standpoints about language and learning differences: The need for research on the literate lives of Latina/o language minority students. Journal of Multicultural Education Research, 6, 9–34.
30.
GonzálezT.BertrandM.SalinasS. (2019). Pursuing inclusive schools: The case of youth researchers of Color expanding a new vision. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 19(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.56829/2158-396X.19.1.4
31.
HaddadK.JacquezF.VaughnL. (2022). A scoping review of youth advisory structures in the United States: Applications, outcomes, and best practices. American Journal of Community Psychology, 70(3-4), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12597
32.
HammersleyM.AtkinsonP. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice (2nd ed.). Routledge.
33.
HarmanR.Varga-DobaiK. (2012). Critical performative pedagogy: Emergent bilingual learners challenge local immigration issues. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 14(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.18251/ijme.v14i2.512
34.
HartR. A. (1992). Children's participation: From tokenism to citizenship. UNICEF.
35.
Hernández-SacaD. I.Gutman KahnL.CannonM. A. (2018). Intersectionality dis/ability research: How dis/ability research in education engages intersectionality to uncover the multidimensional construction of dis/abled experiences. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), 286–311. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18762439
36.
HillierA.KroehleK. (2021). “I’ll save you a seat”: Negotiating power in a participatory action research project with Queer and Trans young adults. Urban Education, 58(10), 2598–2627. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859211023106.
37.
JenkinsD. A. (2022). Feeling Black: Black urban high school youth and visceral geographies of anti-Black racism. Equity & Excellence in Education, 55(3), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2022.2131196
38.
KeddieA. (2015). Student voice and teacher accountability: Possibilities and problematics. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23(2), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2014.977806
LacV. T.AntunesA. C.DanielJ.MackeyJ. (2021). What is the role of adult facilitators in critical participatory action research? Employing affective labor while navigating the politics and the perils alongside minoritized youth Researchers. Educational Policy, 36(1), 142–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048211059200
41.
LacV. T.FineM. (2018). The good, the bad, and the ugly: An autoethnographic journey on doing participatory action research as a graduate student. Urban Education, 53(4), 562–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085918762491
42.
LacV. T.MansfieldK. C. (2018). What do students have to do with educational leadership? Making a case for centering student voice. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 13(1), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775117743748
43.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163320
44.
LeonardoZ. (2023). The color of supremacy: Beyond the discourse of “white privilege”. In TaylorE.GillbornD.Ladson-BillingsG. (Eds.), Foundations of critical race theory in education (pp. 321–333). Routledge.
45.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
46.
LoganJ. R.Burdick-WillJ. (2017). School segregation and disparities in urban, suburban, and rural areas. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 674(1), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217733936
47.
LoveB. (2019). We want to do more than survive: Abolitionist teaching and the pursuit of educational freedom. Beacon Press.
48.
MaloneH.ChengL.SheikhS. (2022). Youth voice in Community Schools: A practical guide to advance Community Schools strategies for youth voice, engagement, and leadership. Institute for Educational Leadership, Coalition for Community Schools.
McFarlandD. A.StarmannsC. (2009). Inside student government: The variable quality of high school student councils. Teachers College Record (1970), 111(1), 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100106
51.
Milner IVH. R. (2007). Race, culture, and researcher positionality: Working through dangers seen, unseen, and unforeseen. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 388–400. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07309471
52.
Milner IVH. R.LomoteyK. (2021). Introduction. In Milner IVH. R.LomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 1–6). Routledge.
53.
MitraD.SerriereS.KirshnerB. (2014). Youth participation in U.S. contexts: Student voice without a national mandate. Children & Society, 28(4), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12005
54.
MorrellE. (2008). Critical literacy and urban youth: Pedagogies of access, dissent, and liberation. Routledge.
55.
NaraianS.OylerC. (2013). Professional development for special education reform: Rearticulating the experiences of urban educators. Urban Education, 49(5), 499–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085913478623
Perez HuberL.LopezC. B.MalagonM. C.VelezV.SolorzanoD. G. (2008). Getting beyond the ‘symptom,’ acknowledging the ‘disease’: Theorizing racist nativism. Contemporary Justice Review, 11(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580701850397
60.
RedmondS.DolanP. (2016). Towards a conceptual model of youth leadership development. Child & Family Social Work, 21(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12146
SalisburyJ. D.ShethM. J.AngtonA. (2020). “They didn’t even talk about oppression”: School leadership protecting the whiteness of leadership through resistance practices to a youth voice initiative. Journal of Education Human Resources, 38(1), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.3138/jehr.2019-0010
63.
Shakespeare (2013). Chapter 16: The social model of disability. In DavisL. J. (Ed.), The disability studies reader (4th ed, pp. 214–221). Taylor and Francis.
64.
ShethM. J.SalisburyJ. D. (2022). “School’s a lie”: Toward critical race intersectional pedagogy for youth intellectual activism in policy partnerships. Educational Policy, 36(1), 100–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048211059478
65.
SilvaE. (2001). ‘Squeaky wheels and flat tires’: A case study of students as reform participants. Forum (Chicago, Ill ), 43(2), 95–99. https://doi.org/10.2304/forum.2001.43.2.15
66.
SimmsS.NicolazzoZ.JonesA. (2021). Don’t say sorry, do better: Trans students of color, disidentification, and internet futures. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 16(3), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000337
67.
TeferaA. A.FischmanG. E. (2020). How and why context matters in the study of racial disproportionality in special education: Toward a critical disability education policy approach. Equity & Excellence in Education, 53(4), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2020.1791284
68.
TeferaA. A.FischmanG. E. (2024). Beyond good intentions in special education policy: Engaging with critical disability intersectional research. Qualitative Inquiry, 30(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004231165461
69.
TeferaA. A.VoulgaridesC. K. (2016). Is educational policy alleviating or perpetuating the racialization of disabilities? An examination of “big-P” and “little-p” policies. Teachers College Record, 118(14), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811611801406
70.
ThoriusK. K.GonzálezT.JacksonR. G. (2020). Accounting for the intersectional complexity of disability and race in critical youth studies/youth participatory action research data collection methods. In AliA. I.McCartyT. L. (Eds.), Critical youth research in education: Methodologies of praxis and care (pp. 117–135). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429277863
71.
TruthS. (1864). Letter from Sojourner truth. Place of publication not identified. National Anti-Slavery Standard.
72.
ValenciaR. R. (2010). Dismantling contemporary deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. Routledge.
73.
WallK.CassidyC.RobinsonC.HallE.BeatonM.KanyalM.MitraD. (2019). Look who’s talking: Factors for considering the facilitation of very young children’s voices. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 17(4), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X19875767
74.
WelshR. O.SwainW. A. (2020). (Re)defining urban education: A conceptual review and empirical exploration of the definition of urban education. Educational Researcher, 49(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20902822
75.
WeltonA. D.BrockB.PerryM. (2014). Building a youth leadership fortress: High school women of color as visible activists. In NewcombW. S.MansfieldK. C. (Eds.), Women interrupting, disrupting, and revolutionizing educational policy and practice (pp. 79–98). Information Age Publishing.
76.
WeltonA. D.HarrisT. O. (2021). Youth of color social movements for racial justice: The politics of interrogating the school-to-prison pipeline. Educational Policy, 36(1), 57–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048211059728
77.
WinnL. T.WinnM. T. (2016). “We want this to be owned by you”: The promise and perils of youth participatory action research. In GreenS.BurkeK. J.McKennaM. K. (Eds.), Youth voices, public spaces, and civic engagement (pp. 111–130). Routledge.
