Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This research examines how a student voice experience—Social Justice Youth Summit—developed youth capacities as transformative school leaders. We engaged a youth development framework situated in school- and community-based youth leadership literature to analyze a diverse group of urban youth’s experiences and sensemaking of the youth voice experience. Findings illuminate that ways in which youth reciprocally developed individual and collective senses of belonging, competence, and agency toward transformative leadership. Our discussion highlights the importance of urban youth engaging across differences to develop a coalition that addressed multiple systems of oppression manifesting in urban spaces.

Keywords

student voice social justice youth development socially just school leadership transformative leadership

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Banks

J. A.

(1993). The canon debate, knowledge construction, and multicultural education. Educational researcher, 22, 4-14.

Bambino

(2002). Critical friends. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 25-27.

Bertrand

(2014). Reciprocal dialogue between educational decision makers and students of color: Opportunities and obstacles. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50, 812-843.

Bertrand

(2016). “I was very impressed”: Responses of surprise to students of color engaged in youth participatory action research. Urban Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0042085916648744

Cammarota

(2011). From hopelessness to hope: Social justice pedagogy in urban education and youth development. Urban Education, 46, 828-844.

Cammarota

Fine

(Eds.) (2010). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. New York, NY: Routledge.

Cannella

Lincoln

(2011). Ethics, research regulations, and critical social science. In Denzin

Lincoln

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 81-90). New York, NY: Sage.

Carver

R. L.

(1997, March). When the ABCs that students learn are agency, belonging, and competence. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

Cook-Sather

(2006). Sound, presence, and power: “Student voice” in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36, 359-390.

10.

Cook-Sather

(2007). What would happen if we treated students as those with opinions that matter? The benefits to principals and teachers of supporting youth engagement in school. NASSP Bulletin, 91, 343-362.

11.

Cook-Sather

Bovill

Felten

(2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

12.

Curry

(2008). Critical friends groups: The possibilities and limitations embedded in teacher professional communities aimed at instructional improvement and school reform. Teachers College Record, 110, 733-774.

13.

Duncan-Andrade

J. M. R.

Morrell

(2008). The art of critical pedagogy: Possibilities for moving from theory to practice in urban schools. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

14.

Fielding

(2001). Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change, 2, 123-141.

15.

Ginwright

Cammarota

(2002). New terrain in youth development: The promise of a social justice approach. Social Justice, 29(4), 82-95.

16.

Ginwright

Cammarota

Noguera

(2006). Youth, social justice, and communities: Toward a theory of urban youth policy. Social Justice, 32(3), 24-40.

17.

Goodenow

(1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationship to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21-43.

18.

Halverson

E. R.

(2005). InsideOut: Facilitating gay youth identity development through a performance-based youth organization. Identity, 5, 67-90.

19.

Irizarry

J. G.

(2009). Reinvigorating multicultural education through youth participatory action research. Multicultural Perspectives, 11, 194-199.

20.

Kirshner

Ginwright

(2012). Youth organizing as a developmental context for African American and Latino adolescents. Child Development Perspectives, 6, 288-294.

21.

Lac

V. T.

Mansfield

K. C.

(2018). What do students have to do with educational leadership? Making a case for centering student voice. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 13(1), 38-58.

22.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1989). Ethics: The failure of positivist science. The Review of Higher Education, 12, 221-240.

23.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Lynham

S. A.

Guba

E. G.

(2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In Denzin

Lincoln

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 81-90). New York, NY: Sage.

24.

Lipman

(2013). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

25.

Mansfield

K. C.

(2014). How listening to student voices informs and strengthens social justice research and practice. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50, 392-430.

26.

Mansfield

K. C.

(2015). The importance of safe space and student voice in schools that serve minoritized learners. Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice, 30, 25-38.

27.

Mansfield

K. C.

Welton

Halx

(2012). Listening to student voice: Toward a more inclusive theory for research and practice. In Boske

Diem

(Eds.), Global leadership for social justice: Taking it from the field to practice (pp. 21-41). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.

28.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

Saldaña

(2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. New York, NY: Sage.

29.

Milner

H. R.

(2012). But what is urban education? Urban Education, 47, 556-561.

30.

Mitra

(2004). The significance of students: Can increasing “student voice” in schools lead to gains in youth development? Teachers College Record, 106, 651-688.

31.

Mitra

(2008). Amplifying student voice. Educational Leadership, 66(3), 20-25.

32.

Mitra

(2018). Student voice in secondary schools: the possibility for deeper change. Journal of Educational Administration, 56, 473-487.

33.

Mitra

Gross

S. J.

(2009). Increasing student voice in high school reform building partnerships, improving outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37, 522-543.

34.

Mitra

D. L.

Serriere

S. C.

(2012). Student voice in elementary school reform: Examining youth development in fifth graders. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 743-774.

35.

Morgan

Streb

(2001). Building citizenship: how student voice in service-learning develops civic values. Social Science Quarterly, 82, 154-169.

36.

Morrow

S. L.

(2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 250-260.

37.

O’Connor

Mueller

Neal

(2014). Student resilience in urban America. In Milner

H. R.

Lomotey

(Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 75-96). New York, NY: Routledge.

38.

Oldfather

(1995). Songs “come back most to them”: Students’ experiences as researchers. Theory into Practice, 34, 131-137.

39.

Patton

M. Q.

(2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. New York, NY: Sage.

40.

Poon

Cohen

(2012). Youth participatory action research and the future of education reform. Journal of Critical Thought and Praxis, 1, 145-171.

41.

Roth

Brooks-Gunn

Murray

Foster

(1998). Promoting healthy adolescents: Synthesis of youth development programs evaluations. Journal of Research Adolescence, 8, 423-459.

42.

Saldaña

(2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. New York, NY: Sage.

43.

Salisbury

Spikes

Graeber

(2018). Bringing the voices of youth to the table: A social justice youth development approach. Journal of Ethical Educational Leadership, 5, 117-136.

44.

Stake

R. E.

(1995). The art of case study research. New York, NY: Sage.

45.

Stinson

S. W.

(1993). Meaning and value: Reflections on what students say about school. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 8, 216-238.

46.

Sussman

(2015). The student voice collaborative: An effort to systematize student participation in school and district improvement. Teachers College Record, 117(13), 119-134.

47.

Tillman

L. C.

(2002). Culturally sensitive research approaches: An African-American perspective. Educational Researcher, 31(9), 3-12.

48.

Tintiangco-Cubales

Daus-Magbual

Desai

Sabac

Torres

M. V.

(2016). Into our hoods: Where critical performance pedagogy births resistance. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29, 1308-1325.

49.

Warren

M. R.

Mira

Nikundiwe

(2008). Youth organizing: From youth development to school reform. New Directions for Youth Development, 117, 27-42.

50.

Watkins

N. D.

Larson

R. W.

Sullivan

P. J.

(2007). Bridging intergroup difference in a community youth program. American Behavioral Scientist, 51, 380-402.

51.

Welton

A. D.

Harris

T. O.

Altamirano

Williams

(2017). The politics of student voice: Conceptualizing a model for critical analysis. In Young

M. D.

Diem

(Eds.), Critical approaches to education policy analysis: Moving beyond tradition (pp. 83-110). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

“We Have to Empower Ourselves to Make Changes!”: Developing Collective Capacity for Transformative Change Through an Urban Student Voice Experience

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References