Urban school leaders can support mathematics instruction that acknowledges and sustains students’ racialized and cultured ways of knowing and being. Yet, leadership for racial justice is often discussed separately from instructional improvement. In this conceptual inquiry, we investigate how leadership can integrate antiracist practices into teaching and learning. We synthesize justice-focused leadership and antiracist mathematics literatures to present a framework of interconnected leadership practices and elaborate on this vision through an example drawn from our collaboration with practitioners. This manuscript and framework provide precise descriptions of leadership actions to support practitioners and researchers seeking to support antiracist, ambitious mathematics instruction.
AgarwalP.Sengupta-IrvingT. (2019). Integrating power to advance the study of connective and productive disciplinary engagement in mathematics and science. Cognition and Instruction, 37(3), 349-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1624544
2.
*AguirreJ. M.Mayfield-IngramK.MartinD. B. (2013a). The Impact of Identity in K-8 Mathematics Learning and Teaching: Rethinking Equity-Based Practices. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
3.
*AguirreJ. M.TurnerE. E.BartellT. G.Kalinec-CraigC.FooteM. Q.Roth McDuffieA.DrakeC. (2013b). Making connections in practice: How prospective elementary teachers connect to children’s mathematical thinking and community funds of knowledge in mathematics instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(2), 178-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112466900
4.
AlimH. S.ParisD. (2017). What is culturally sustaining pedagogy and why does it matter? In ParisD.AlimH. S. (Eds.), Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world (p. 1-21). Teachers College Press.
5.
*AllenR. L.LiouD. D. (2019). Managing whiteness: The call for educational leadership to breach the contractual expectations of white supremacy. Urban Education, 54(5), 677-705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085918783819
6.
BangM.VossoughiS. (2016). Participatory design research and educational justice: Studying learning and relations within social change making. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 173-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1181879
7.
*Barajas-LópezF.IshimaruA. M. (2020). “Darles el lugar”: A place for nondominant family knowing in educational equity. Urban Education, 55(1), 38-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916652179
8.
*Barajas-LópezF.LarnellG. V. (2019). Research commentary: Unpacking the links between equitable teaching practices and standards for mathematical practice: Equity for whom and under what conditions?Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 50(4), 349-361. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.50.4.0349
9.
*BartellT.WagerA.EdwardsA.BatteyD.FooteM.SpencerJ. (2017). Toward a framework for research linking equitable teaching with the standards for mathematical practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(1), 7-21. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.1.0007
10.
*BatteyD.FrankeM. (2015). Integrating professional development on mathematics and equity: Countering deficit views of students of color. Education and Urban Society, 47(4), 433-462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124513497788
11.
BatteyD.LeyvaL. A. (2016). A framework for understanding whiteness in mathematics education. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v9i2a294
12.
BenfordR. D.SnowD. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611-639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
13.
*BerryR. Q. IIIPinterH. H.McClainO. L. (2013). A critical review of American K–12 mathematics education, 1900–present: Implications for the experiences and achievement of black children. In J. Leonard & D. Martin (Eds.), The brilliance of black children in mathematics: Beyond the numbers and toward new discourse(pp. 23-53). Information Age Publishing, Inc.
14.
*BertrandM.RodelaK. C. (2018). A framework for rethinking educational leadership in the margins: Implications for social justice leadership preparation. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 13(1), 10-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775117739414
15.
*BoalerJ.StaplesM. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside school. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 110(3), 608-645. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810811000302
16.
*BogotchI. E. (2002). Educational leadership and social justice: Theory into practice. Journal of School Leadership, 12(2), 138-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460201200203
*BostonM. D.HenrickE. C.GibbonsL. K.BerebitskyD.ColbyG. T. (2017). Investigating how to support principals as instructional leaders in mathematics. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 12(3), 183-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775116640254
19.
*BrownK. M. (2004). Leadership for social justice and equity: Weaving a transformative framework and pedagogy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 77-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X03259147
20.
*BullockE. C. (2018). Intersectional analysis in critical mathematics education research: A response to figure hiding. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), 122-145. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18759039
CobbP.JacksonK. (2011). Towards an empirically grounded theory of action for improving the quality of mathematics teaching at scale. Mathematics Teacher Education & Development, 13(1). https://mted.merga.net.au/index.php/mted/article/view/44
23.
CobbP.JacksonK.HenrickE.SmithT. M., & the MIST team. (2018). Systems for instructional improvement: Creating coherence from the classroom to the district office. Harvard Education Press.
24.
CoburnC. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476-509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805276143
25.
CoburnC. E. (2006). Framing the problem of reading instruction: Using frame analysis to uncover the microprocesses of policy implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 343-349. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043003343
26.
CohenD. K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 311-329. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737012003311
27.
*CohenE. G.LotanR. A.ScarlossB. A.ArellanoA. R. (1999). Complex instruction: Equity in cooperative learning classrooms. Theory into Practice, 38(2), 80-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543836
28.
DarlingF. (2019). Incorporating cultural assets in yucatec Maya math classrooms: Opportunities missed?Journal of Mathematics and Culture, 13(1), 60. https://journalofmathematicsandculture.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/final-darling-131-paper-2.pdf
29.
*DeMatthewsD.BrownC. H. (2019). Urban school leadership and community violence: Principal perspectives and proactive responses to student mental health needs. Paper presented at The Educational Forum.
30.
*DeMatthewsD.IzquierdoE. (2018). The importance of principals supporting dual language education: A social justice leadership framework. Journal of Latinos and Education, 17(1), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2017.1282365
31.
DiemS.WeltonA. D. (2021). Anti-racist Educational Leadership and Policy: Addressing Racism in Public. Routledge.
32.
*DunleavyT. K.MarzocchiA. S.GholsonM. L. (2021). Teacher candidates’ silhouettes: Supporting mathematics teacher identity development in secondary mathematics methods courses. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 13(1), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2020.1831173
33.
Eagle ShieldA.ParisD.ParisR.San PedroT. (2020). Education in movement spaces: Standing Rock to Chicago Freedom Square. Routledge.
34.
EngeströmY. (2011). From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 598-628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311419252
35.
*EsmondeI. (2009). Ideas and identities: Supporting equity in cooperative mathematics learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 1008-1043. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309332562
36.
*EsmondeI.Langer-OsunaJ. M. (2013). Power in numbers: Student participation in mathematical discussions in heterogeneous spaces. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 288-315. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0288
37.
*EzzaniM.BrooksM. (2019). Culturally relevant leadership: Advancing critical consciousness in American muslim students. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(5), 781-811. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18821358
38.
FennemaE.CarpenterT. P.FrankeM. L.LeviL.JacobsV. R.EmpsonS. B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children's thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 403-434. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.27.4.0403
39.
*FraiseN. J.BrooksJ. S. (2015). Toward a theory of culturally relevant leadership for school-community culture. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 17(1), 6-21. https://doi.org/10.18251/ijme.v17i1.983
40.
*FurmanG. (2012). Social justice leadership as praxis: Developing capacities through preparation programs. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(2), 191-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11427394
41.
*GallowayM. K.IshimaruA. M. (2020). Leading equity teams: The role of formal leaders in building organizational capacity for equity. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 25(2), 107-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2019.1699413
42.
*GholsonM.MartinD. B. (2014). Smart girls, black girls, mean girls, and bullies: At the intersection of identities and the mediating role of young girls’ social network in mathematical communities of practice. Journal of Education, 194(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741419400105
43.
*GoldenbergB. M. (2013). White teachers in urban classrooms: Embracing non-white students’ cultural capital for better teaching and learning. Urban Education, 49(1), 111-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085912472510
44.
*GoodenM. A. (2012). What does racism have to do with leadership? Countering the idea of color-blind leadership: A reflection on race and the growing pressures of the urban principalship. Educational Foundations, 26(1), 67-84. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ968818.pdf
45.
*GoodenM. A. (2021). Why every principal should write a racial autobiography. Educational Leadership, 78(7), 32-37. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/why-every-principal-should-write-a-racial-autobiography
46.
*GreenT. L. (2017). Community-based equity audits: A practical approach for educational leaders to support equitable community-school improvements. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(1), 3-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16672513
47.
*GresalfiM. S.CobbP. (2011). Negotiating identities for mathematics teaching in the context of professional development. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(3), 270-304. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.42.3.0270
48.
GrissomJ. A.EgaliteA. J.LindsayC. A. (2021). How Principals Affect Students and Schools: A systemic synthesis of two decades of research. Retrieved from New York: http://www.wallacefoundation.org/principalsynthesis.
49.
GutiérrezK. D.JurowA. S.VakilS. (2020). Social design-based experiments: A utopian methodology for understanding new possibilities for learning. In Handbook of the Cultural Foundations of Learning(pp. 330-347). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774977-23
50.
*GutiérrezR. (2012). Context matters: How should we conceptualize equity in mathematics education? In Equity in discourse for mathematics education (pp. 17-33). Springer.
51.
*GutiérrezR. (2016). Strategies for creative insubordination in mathematics teaching. Special Issue Mathematics Education: Through the Lens of Social Justice, 7(1), 52-62. https://www.todos-math.org/assets/documents/TEEM/teem7_final1.pdf#page=52
52.
*GutiérrezR., (2018). Introduction: The need to rehumanize mathematics. In I. Goffney, R. Gutiérrez, & M. Boston (Eds.), Rehumanizing mathematics for black, indigenous, and Latinx students (Annual perspectives in mathematics education; Vol. 2018).National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
53.
*GutsteinE. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 37-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034699
54.
HandV.PenuelW. R.GutiérrezK. D. (2013). (Re)Framing educational possibility: Attending to power and equity in shaping access to and within learning opportunities. Human Development, 55(5–6), 250-268. https://doi.org/10.1159/000345313
55.
*HillH. C.BlunkM. L.CharalambosC. Y.LewisJ. M.PhelpsG.SleepL.BallD. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430-511. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802177235
56.
*HorsfordS. D. (2014). When race enters the room: Improving leadership and learning through racial literacy. Theory Into Practice, 53(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.885812
57.
*HorsfordS. D.GroslandT.GunnK. M. (2011). Pedagogy of the personal and professional: Toward a framework for culturally relevant leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 21(4), 582-606. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461102100404
58.
InnabiH.EmanuelssonJ. (2021). Enrichment in school principals’ ways of seeing mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(10), 1508-1539. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1782496
59.
IrbyD. J.DrameE.CloughC.CroomM. (2019). “Sometimes things get worse before they get better”: A counter-narrative of white suburban school leadership for racial equity. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 18(2), 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2019.1611869
60.
*IshimaruA. M. (2019). Just schools: Building equitable collaborations with families and communities. Teachers College Press.
61.
*IshimaruA. M.GallowayM. K. (2014). Beyond individual effectiveness: Conceptualizing organizational leadership for equity. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(1), 93-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2014.890733
62.
IshimaruA. M.GallowayM. K. (2019). Hearts and minds first: Institutional logics in pursuit of educational equity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(3), 470-503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20947459
63.
JabareenY. (2009). Building a conceptual framework: Philosophy, definitions, and procedure. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(4), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800406
64.
JacksonK.GibbonsL. (2014). Accounting for how practitioners frame a common problem of practice–students’ struggle in mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Research Conference, New Orleans, LA.
65.
*JosephN. M., (2021). Black feminist mathematics pedagogies (BlackFMP): A curricular confrontation to gendered antiblackness in the US mathematics education system. Curriculum Inquiry, 51(1), 75-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2020.1813002
66.
KazemiE.FrankeM.LampertM. (2009). Developing pedagogies in teacher education to support novice teachers’ ability to enact ambitious instruction. Paper presented at the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
67.
KhalifaM. A. (2018). Culturally responsive school leadership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
68.
*KhalifaM. A.GoodenM. A.DavisJ. E. (2016). Culturally responsive school leadership: A synthesis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1272-1311. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316630383
69.
*KokkaK. (2019). Healing-Informed social justice mathematics: Promoting students’ sociopolitical consciousness and well-being in mathematics class. Urban Education, 54(9), 1179-1209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085918806947
70.
LampertM.BeasleyH.GhousseiniH.KazemiE.FrankeM. (2010). Using designed instructional activities to enable novices to manage ambitious mathematics teaching. In SteinM. K.KucanL. (Eds.), Instructional explanations in the disciplines (pp. 129-141). Springer.
LeeJ. (2012). College for all: Gaps between desirable and actual P–12 math achievement trajectories for college readiness. Educational Researcher, 41(2), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11432746
73.
LeonardoZ. (2013). Race frameworks: A multidimensional theory of racism and education. Teachers College Press.
74.
LeyvaL. A. (2017). Unpacking the male superiority myth and masculinization of mathematics at the intersections: A review of research on gender in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(4), 397-433. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.4.0397
75.
*MagnoC.SchiffM. (2010). Culturally responsive leadership: Best practice in integrating immigrant students. Intercultural Education, 21(1), 87-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675981003666274
76.
*MansfieldK. C. (2014). How listening to student voices informs and strengthens social justice research and practice. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(3), 392-430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13505288
77.
*MartinD. B. (2007). Beyond missionaries or cannibals: Who should teach mathematics to African American children?The High School Journal, 91(1), 6-28. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2007.0023
78.
*MartinD. B. (2009). Researching race in mathematics education. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 111(2), 295-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100208
79.
*McCrayC. R.BeachumF. D. (2014). Countering plutocracies: Increasing autonomy and accountability through culturally relevant leadership. School Leadership & Management, 34(4), 392-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.943171
MosesR. P.CobbC. E. (2001). Radical Equations: Civil rights from Mississippi to the algebra project. Beacon Press.
82.
*MunterC.HainesC. (2019). Mathematics teachers’ enactment of cognitively demanding tasks and students’ perception of racial differences in opportunity. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 21(3), 155-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2019.1576002
83.
*NasirN.McKinney de RoystonM. (2013). Power, identity, and mathematical practices outside and inside school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 264-287. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0264
84.
*NasirN. S. (2002). Identity, goals, and learning: Mathematics in cultural practice. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2-3), 213-247. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL04023_6
85.
NasirN. S.LeeC. D.PeaR.McKinney de RoystonM. (2021). Rethinking learning: What the interdisciplinary science tells us. Educational Researcher, 50(8), 557-565. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211047251
86.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Author.
87.
*ParkV. (2018). Leading data conversation moves: Toward data-informed leadership for equity and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(4), 617-647. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18769050
88.
PatelL. (2014). Countering coloniality in educational research: From ownership to answerability. Educational Studies, 50(4), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2014.924942
89.
RaddS. I.GenerettG. G.GoodenM. A.TheoharisG. (2021). Five Practices for Equity-Focused School Leadership. ASCD.
90.
RaddS. I.GroslandT. J. (2019). Desirablizing whiteness: A discursive practice in social justice leadership that entrenches white supremacy. Urban Education, 54(5), 656-676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085918783824
91.
RigbyJ.FormanS.LewisR. (2019a). Principals’ leadership moves to implement a discipline-specific instructional improvement policy. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 20(2), 236-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2019.1668422
92.
RigbyJ.Larbi-CherifA.RosenquistB. A.SharpeC. J.CobbP.SmithT. (2017). Administrator observation and feedback: Does it lead toward improvement in inquiry-oriented math instruction?Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(3), 475-516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16687006
93.
RigbyJ.TredwayL. (2015). Actions matter: Examining equity principles for school leaders. In KhalifaM.GrantC.ArnoldN. W. (Eds.), The Handbook of urban educational leadership (pp. 329-348). Rowman & Littlefield.
94.
RigbyJ.WalshE. D.BotenS.DenoA.HarrisonM. S.MerrellR.PritchettS.SeamanS. (2019b). A view from the field: The process of improving equitable systems leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(5), 484-500. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2018-0181
95.
*RodelaK. C.Rodriguez-MojicaC. (2019). Equity leadership informed by community cultural wealth: Counterstories of latinx school administrators. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(2), 289-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X19847513
96.
*RubelL. (2017). Equity-Directed instructional practices: Beyond the dominant paradigm. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 10(2), 66-105. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v10i2a324
97.
*RubelL. H.LimV. Y.Hall-WieckertM.SullivanM. (2016). Teaching mathematics for spatial justice: An investigation of the lottery. Cognition and Instruction, 34(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2015.1118691
SaxeG. B. (1988). The mathematics of child street vendors. Child Development, 59(5), 1415-1425. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130503
100.
*ScanlanM.LópezF. (2012). ¡Vamos! How school leaders promote equity and excellence for bilingual students. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 583-625. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11436270
101.
SchafferC. L.WhiteM.BrownC. M. (2018). A tale of three cities: Defining urban schools within the context of varied geographic areas. Education and Urban Society, 50(6), 507-523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124517713605
102.
*ShahN. (2017). Race, ideology, and academic ability: A relational analysis of racial narratives in mathematics. Teachers College Record, 119(7), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711900705
103.
SieglerR. S.DuncanG. J.Davis-KeanP. E.DuckworthK.ClaessensA.EngelM.SusperreguyM. I.ChenM. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological Science, 23(7), 691-697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612440101
104.
SnowD. A.VliegenthartR.KetelaarsP. (2018). The framing perspective on social movements. In D. Snow, S. Soule, H. Kriese, & H. McCammon (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 392-410). Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119168577.ch22
105.
SpillaneJ. P.DiamondJ. B. (Eds.). (2007). Distributed leadership in practice. Teachers College, Columbia University.
106.
SteinM. K.EngleR. A.SmithM. S.HughesE. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802229675
SwansonJ.WeltonA. (2019). When good intentions only go so far: White principals leading discussions about race. Urban Education, 54(5), 732-759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085918783825
109.
*TheoharisG.O’TooleJ. (2011). Leading inclusive ELL: Social justice for leadership for English language learners. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(4), 646-688. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11401616
110.
*TODOS: Mathematics for ALL (2020). Student and Family-Centered Mathematics Assessment.
111.
*TODOS: Mathematics for ALL (2021). The Mo(ve)ment to Prioritize Antiracist Mathematics: Planning for This and Every School Year.
112.
TuckE. (2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79(3), 409-428. U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.79.3.n0016675661t3n15
113.
*WaddellL. R. (2014). Using culturally ambitious teaching practices to support urban mathematics teaching and learning. Journal of Praxis in Multicultural Education, 8(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.9741/2161-2978.1069
114.
*WashingtonD.TorresZ.GholsonM.MartinD. B. (2012). Crisis as a discursive frame in mathematics education research and reform. In Alternative forms of knowing (in) mathematics (pp. 53-69). Springer.
115.
WeltonA.DiemS.CarpenterB. W. (2019). Negotiating the politics of antiracist leadership: The challenges of leading under the predominance of whiteness. Urban Education, 54(5), 627-630. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085918783830
116.
*WilliamsJ. J.TunksJ.Gonzalez-CarriedoR.FaulkenberryE.MiddlemissW. (2020). Supporting mathematics understanding through funds of knowledge. Urban Education, 55(3), 476-502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916654523
117.
*WilsonJ.NazemiM.JacksonK.GarrisonA. (2019). Investigating teaching in conceptually oriented mathematics classrooms characterized by African American student success. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 50(4), 362-400. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.50.4.0362
118.
WoulfinS.RigbyJ. G. (2017). Coaching for Coherence: How instructional coaches lead change in the evaluation era. Educational Researcher, 46(6), 323-328. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17725525
