This case study describes tensions that became apparent between community members and school administrators after a proposal to close a historically African American public high school in a large urban Southwestern city. When members of the city’s longstanding African American community responded with outrage, the school district’s senior administration backed away from their proposal to close the school, despite making what it felt was a “neutral” and technical-rational decision. However, the local community interpreted this move as the historical continuation of racist behaviors and policies that had been experienced by the community over a period of several decades. Critical race theory (CRT) allows for an analysis regarding the nature of these beliefs about race and indicates the need for school administrators to engage the realities of the community members they serve, rather than merely enacting technical-rational administrative behaviors that serve to continue regimes of marginalization and oppression.
ArriazaG. (2004). Making changes that stay made: School reform and community involvement. The High School Journal, 87(4), 10-24.
2.
BellD. A. (1998). Afrolantica legacies. Chicago, IL: Thirdworld Press.
3.
BlairM. (2008). “Whiteness” as institutionalized racism as conspiracy: Understanding the paradigm. Educational Review, 60, 249-251.
4.
CrenshawK.GotandaN.PellerG.ThomasK. (Eds.). (1995). Critical race theory: Key writings that formed the movement. New York, NY: New Press.
5.
CreswellJ. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
6.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design. Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
7.
DelgadoR. (1989). Storytelling for oppositionists and others: A plea for narrative. Michigan Law Review, 87, 2411-2441.
8.
DelgadoR. (Ed.). (1995). Critical race theory: The cutting edge. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
9.
DelgadoR.StefancicJ. (2001). Critical race theory: An introduction. New York, NY: New York University Press.
10.
DiamondJ.GomezK. (2004). African American parents’ educational orientations: The importance of social class and parents’ perceptions of schools. Education and Urban Society, 36, 383-427.
11.
DixsonA. (2006). Introduction. In DixsonA. D.RousseauC. K. (Eds.), Critical race theory in education: All god’s children got a song (pp. 1-8). New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
FoucaultM. (1980), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977 (GordonColin, Ed.). London: Harvester.
13.
HernandezD. (1970). Mexican American challenge to a sacred cow. Los Angeles: University of California.
14.
KhalifaM. A. (2011). Teacher expectations and principal behavior: Responding to teacher acquiescence. Urban Review, 43, 1-26.
15.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education?International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 7-24.
16.
Ladson-BillingsG.TateW. F. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97, 47-68.
17.
LamY. (1982). School closure: An answer to declining enrollment. Educational Horizons, 60(3), 111-114.
18.
LareauA. (2000). Home advantage. Social class and parental intervention in elementary education. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
19.
LareauA. (2001). Linking Bourdieu’s concept of capital to the broader field: The case of family-school relationships. In BiddleB. J. (Ed.), Social class, poverty, and education: Policy and practice (pp. 77-100). New York, NY: Routlege/Falmer.
20.
LareauA.HorvatE. M. (1999). Moments of social inclusion and exclusion: Race, class, and cultural capital in family-school relationships. Sociology of Education, 72, 37-53.
21.
LarsonC. (1997). Is the land of Oz an alien nation? A social political study of school community conflict. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33, 312-350.
22.
LipmanP. (1998). Race, class and power in school restructuring. New York: SUNY Press.
23.
LópezG. (2003). The (racially neutral) politics of education: A critical race theory perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 68-94.
24.
LynnM.ParkerL. (2006). Critical race studies in education: Examining a decade of research in U.S. schools. Urban Review, 38, 257-334.
25.
MarxS. (2008). Critical race theory. In GivenL. M. (Ed.), The sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vol. 2, pp. 163-167). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26.
McWhorterJ. (2000). Losing the race: Self-sabotage in Black America. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
27.
MilnerR. H.IV. (2007). Race, culture, and researcher positionality: Working through dangers seen, unseen, and unforeseen. Educational Research, 36, 388-400.
28.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
29.
MoynihanD. P. (1965). Employment, income, and the ordeal of the Negro family. Daedalus, 94, 745-770.
30.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
31.
ScheurichJ.YoungM. (1997). Coloring epistemologies: Are our research epistemologies racially biased?Educational Researcher, 26(4), 4-16.
32.
Siddle WalkerE. V. (1993). Caswell County Training School, 1933-1969: Relationships between community and school. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 161-182.
33.
SolomonR. P. (2002). School leaders and antiracism: Overcoming pedagogical and political obstacles. Journal of School Leadership, 12, 174-197.
34.
SolorzanoD. (1997). Images and words that wound: Critical race theory, racial stereotyping, and teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 24, 5-19.
35.
SolorzanoD.YossoT. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for educational research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8, 23-44.
36.
SowellT. (1981). Ethnic America. New York, NY: Basic Books.
37.
SpringJ. (2004). Deculturalization and the struggle for equality (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
38.
SugrueT. (1998). The origins of urban crisis. Race and inequality in postwar Detroit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
TateW. F. (1997). Critical race theory and education: History, theory, and implications. In AppleM. W.CooperD. (Eds.), Review of research in higher education (pp. 195-247). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
40.
TaylorE. (1998). A primer on critical race theory. The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, 19, 122-124.
41.
TaylorE. (2009). The foundations of critical race theory in education: An introduction. In TaylorE.GilbomD.Ladson-BillingsG. (Eds.), Foundations of critical race theory in education (pp. 1-13). New York, NY: Routledge.
42.
ThomasC. (1980). Girls and counter-school culture (Melbourne Working Papers). Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: University of Melbourne.
43.
ValenciaR.BlackM. (2002). Mexican Americans don’t value education!—On the basis of myth, mythmaking and debunking. Journal of Latinos and Education, 1, 81-103.
44.
ValenzuelaA. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: State University of New York.
45.
WatkinsD. (1986). The approaches to learning of Australian tertiary students: A replication. Higher Education Research and Development, 5, 185-189.
46.
WebbT.BriscoeF.MussmanM. (2009). Preparing teachers to resist the neoliberal panopticon. Educational Foundations, 23(3-4), 3-18.
47.
WeberM. (1992). The Protestant ethic andthe spirit of capitalism (ParsonsTalcott Trans.). New York, NY: Routledge.
48.
WilliamsP. J. (1991). On being the object of property (a gift of intelligent rage). The alchemy of race and rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
YossoT. (2006). Whose culture has capital? In DixonA.RousseauC. (Eds.), Critical race theory in education: All God’s children got a song. New York, NY: Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
