The purpose of this study was to explore if and how urban school districts explicitly addressed the needs of Black students within their budgets. Culturally responsive school leadership was used to examine district leaders' budgetary actions. Using content analysis methods and randomized purposeful sampling, we reviewed budget plans from districts with the largest percentages of Black students. We found that 7 of 11 districts included Black students in their plans. However, actions and expenditures did not clearly specify if or how they would support Black students. Recommendations include explicitly incorporating actions and expenditures into plans that directly target Black students.
AffeldtJ. T. (2015). New accountability in California through local control funding reforms: the promise and the gaps. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(23), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.2023
2.
BabbieE. (2001). The practice of social research (9th ed.). Wadsworth.
3.
BanksJ. A.CooksonP.GayG.HawleyW. D.IrvineJ. J.NietoS.SchofieldJ. W.StephenW. G. (2001). Diversity within unity: Essential principles for teaching and learning in a multicultural society. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(3), 196-198. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170108300309
4.
BennettR. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
5.
BersinA.KirstM. W.LiuG. (2008). Getting beyond the facts: Reforming California school finance. The Chief Justice Earl Warren Institute at the University of California. Retrieved fromhttp://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED537655.pdf
6.
BindaK. P. (1995). Perceptions of local control in a first nations tribal community. McGill Journal of Education, 30(2), 199-209.
7.
CarterP. L.SkibaR.ArredondoM. I.PollockM. (2016). You can’t fix what you don’t look at: acknowledging race in addressing racial discipline disparities. Urban Education, 52(2), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916660350
8.
CombeL. G. (2020). Converging pandemics impact on students, schools, and communities: COVID-19 and racism. NASN School Nurse, 35(5), 246-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942602X20945324
9.
Darling-HammondL. (2014). Foreword. In MilnerR. H.LomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. xi-xiv). New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
Education Trust-West. (2014). Building a more equitable and participatory school system in California: The local control funding formula’s first year. Author.
11.
Education Trust-West. (2016). Puzzling plans and budgets: Making sense of California’s second year local control and accountability plans. Author.
12.
Education Trust-West. (2017). The steep road to resource equity in California education: The local control funding formula after three years. Author.
13.
FordD. Y. (2013). Multicultural issues: gifted underrepresentation and prejudice—learning from Allport and Merton. Gifted Child Today, 36(1), 62-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217512465285
14.
FordD. Y.WhitingG. W. (2010). Beyond testing: Social and psychological considerations in recruiting and retaining gifted black students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(1), 131-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321003400106
15.
FranklinJ. H.MossA. A.Jr. (1998). From slavery to freedom: A history of African Americans (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill, Inc.
16.
Freedom Writers Foundation. (2022, April 7). The freedom writers institute help educators empower all of their students. Freedom Writers Institute. www.freedomwritersfoundation.org.
17.
FreireP. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). Continuum.
GallM.GallJ.BorgW. R. (2007). Educational research: an introduction (8th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
20.
GallowayM. K.CallinP.JamesS.VimegnonH.McCallL. (2019). Culturally responsive, antiracist, or anti-oppressive? How language matters for school change efforts. Equity and Excellence in Education, 52(4), 485-501. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2019.1691959
21.
GreenT. L.IrbyD.IshimaruA. M. (2018, April). A first look at the pre-k-12 equity director: A critical inquiry into role configurations, constraints, and affordances. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
22.
GreerW.Clark-LouqueA.BalogunA.ClayA. (2018). Race-neutral doesn’t work: Black males’ achievement, engagement, and school climate perceptions. Urban Education, 57(7), 1-29.
23.
GregoryA.ClawsonK.DavisA.GerewitzJ. (2015). The promise of restorative practices to transform teacher-student relationships and achieve equity in school discipline. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 25(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2015.994896
24.
HanushekE. A.LindsethA. A. (2009). Schoolhouses, courthouses, and statehouses: Solving the funding-achievement puzzle in America’s schools. Princeton University Press.
25.
HarperS. R. (2015). Success in the schools? Visual counternarratives of young men of color and urban high schools they attend. Urban Education, 50(2), 139-169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915569738
26.
HarrisC. I. (1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106(8).
HowardT. C. (2008). Who really cares? The disenfranchisement of African American males in prek-12 schools: A critical race theory perspective. Teachers College Record, 110(5), 954-985. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810811000507
29.
HowardT. C.HuertaA.HaroB.WoodwardB.TerryL.NavarroO.WatsonK. (2017). The counter narrative: reframing success of high achieving black and latino males in Los Angeles county. University of California. Los Angeles. UCLA Black Male Institute.
30.
HumphreyD.KoppichJ.LavadenzM.MarshJ.O’DayJ.PlankD.StokesL.HallM. (2017). Paving the way to equity and coherence? The local control funding formula in year 3. Local Control Funding Formula Research Collaborative.
31.
JeynesW. H. (2015). A meta-analysis on the factors that best reduce the achievement gap. Education and Urban Society, 47(5), 523-554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124514529155
32.
JohnsonC. C.FargoJ. D. (2010). Urban school reform enabled by transformative professional development: impact on teacher change and student learning of science. Urban Education, 45(1), 4-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085909352073
33.
KaufmanJ. S.JaserS. S.VaughanE. L.ReynoldsJ. S.DiDonatoJ.BernardS. N.Hernandez-BreretonM. (2010). Patterns in office referral data by grade, race/ethnicity, and gender. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12(1), 44-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300708329710
34.
KhalifaM. (2010). Validating social and cultural capital of hyperghettoized at-risk students. Education and Urban Society, 42(5), 620-646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124510366225
35.
KhalifaM. A. (2020). Culturally responsive school leadership. Harvard Education Press.
36.
KhalifaM. A.GoodenM. A.DavisJ. E. (2016). Culturally responsive school leadership: A synthesis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1272-1311. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316630383
37.
KirstM. (2006). Evolution of California state school finance with implications from other states. Stanford Institute for Research on Education Policy and Practice.
38.
KnightS. L.WisemanD. L. (2005). Professional development for teachers of diverse students: A summary of the research. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10(4), 387-405. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327671espr1004_3
39.
KoppichJ. E.HumphreyD. C.MarshJ. A. (2015). Two years of California’s local control funding formula: Time to reaffirm the grand vision. PACE Policy Brief. Policy Analysis for California Education.
40.
KozolJ. (2005). The shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid schooling in America. Three Rivers Press.
Laster-PirtleW. N. (2020). Racial capitalism: A fundamental cause of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic inequities in the United States. Health Education & Behavior, 47(4), 504-508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120922942
44.
LawsonS. F., (Ed.). (2004). To secure these rights: The report of president Harry Truman’s Committee on civil rights. Bedford/St. Martin’s.
45.
LeeJ. (2002). Racial and ethnic achievement gap trends: Reversing the progress toward equity?Educational Researcher, 31(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031001003
46.
MarshJ. A.HallM. (2018). Challenges and choices: A multidistrict analysis of statewide mandated democratic engagement. American Educational Research Journal, 55(2), 243-286. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217734803
47.
MarshallC.RossmanG. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
48.
McIver-BrownR. (2020). The influence of administrators’ allocations of the Local Control Funding Formula on African American students’ academic achievement. Doctoral dissertation, University of Redlands. UR Campus Repository. https://inspire.redlands.edu/work/ns/bf5632ab-dcc7-45ca-b443-89c2f42382ea
49.
Menefee-LibeyD. J.KerchnerC. T. (2015). California’s first year with local control finance and accountability. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(22), 1-15.
MilnerH. RIV. (2013). Chapter 1: analyzing poverty, learning, and teaching through a critical race theory lens. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 1-53. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X12459720
52.
MilnerR. H. (2007). Race, culture, and researcher positionality: working through dangers seen, unseen and unforeseen. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 388-400. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07309471
53.
National College Resources Foundation. (2022). Providing resources and services to help students prepare for, enroll in, and graduate from a degree and/or certificate program. www.thecollegeexpo.org
54.
National Institute on Out-of-School Time. (2004). Making the case: A fact sheet on children and youth in out-of-school time. Wellesley College, Center for Research on Women. Retrieved Oct. 1, 2021, fromhttp://www.niost.org
55.
O’ConnorC. O.MuellerJ.LewisR. L.Rivas-DrakeD.RosenbergS. (2011). ‘‘being’’ black and strategizing for excellence in a racially stratified academic hierarchy. American Educational Research Journal, 48(6), 1232-1257. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211410303
56.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
57.
Siegel-HawleyG.DiemS.FrankenbergE. (2018). The disintegration of Memphis-Shelby County, Tennessee: school district secession and local control in the 21st century. American Educational Research Journal, 55(4), 651-692. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217748880
58.
SleeterC. E. (2012). Confronting the marginalization of culturally responsive pedagogy. Urban Education, 47(3), 562-584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085911431472
59.
TaymansJ.TindleK.FreundM.OrtizD.HarrisL. (2012). Opening the black box: Influential elements of an effective urban professional development school. Urban Education, 47(1), 224-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085911427742
60.
Vasquez-HeiligJ.WardD. R.WeismanE.ColeH. (2014). Community-based school finance and accountability: A new era for local control in education policy?Urban Education, 49(8), 871-894. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085914558171
61.
VaughtS. E. (2009). The color of money: school funding and the commodification of black children. Urban Education, 44(5), 545-570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085908318776
62.
WallaceT. L.ChhuonV. (2014). Proximal processes in urban classrooms: engagement and disaffection in urban youth of color. American Educational Research Journal, 51(5), 937-973. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214531324
63.
WigganG. (2007). Race, school achievement, and educational inequality: toward a student-based inquiry perspective. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 310-333. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430303947
WoodlandM. H. (2008). Whatcha doin' after school?: A review of the literature on the influence of after-school programs on young Black males. Urban Education, 43(5).
