Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024-10
Race-gender D/Discourses in Mathematics Education: (Re)-Producing Inequitable Participation Patterns Across a Diverse,Instructionally-Advanced Urban District
This paper uses quantitative analytics to study talk-based participation in 100 mathematics classrooms across one racially diverse urban school district in the USA. Using the EQUIP observation tool and hierarchical linear modeling, we characterize the quantity and quality of participation for students across 3025 coded turns, by race and gender. We found that in general, boys participated significantly more than girls. We also found that Latinx and Asian/Pacific Islander students had significantly fewer turns than Black and White students. To interpret these findings in context, we analyzed interviews from 29 district leaders using a poststructural framework organized around D/discourse.
AnnammaS. A.AnyonY.JosephN. M.FarrarJ.GreerE.DowningB.SimmonsJ. (2019). Black girls and school discipline: the complexities of being overrepresented and understudied. Urban Education, 54(2), 211–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916646610
2.
BatteyD.LeyvaL. A. (2016). A framework for understanding whiteness in mathematics education. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 9(2), 49–80. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v9i2a294
3.
BerryR. Q.EllisM.HughesS. (2014). Examining a history of failed reforms and recent stories of success: mathematics education and black learners of mathematics in the United States. Race Ethnicity and Education, 17(4), 540–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2013.818534
4.
BostonM. D.WilhelmA. G. (2017). Middle school mathematics instruction in instructionally focused urban districts. Urban Education, 52(7), 829–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915574528
Carter AndrewsD. J.BrownT.CastroE.& Id-DeenE. (2019). The impossibility of being “perfect and white”: black Girls’ racialized and gendered schooling experiences. American Educational Research Journal, 56(6), 2531–2572. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219849392
7.
CobbP.JacksonK.HenrickE.SmithT. M. (2020). Systems for instructional improvement: creating coherence from the classroom to the district office. Harvard Education Press.
8.
CohenE. G.LotanR. A. (2014). Designing groupwork: strategies for the heterogeneous classroom third edition. Teachers College Press.
9.
Copur-GencturkY.CimpianJ. R.LubienskiS. T.ThackerI. (2019). Teachers’ bias against the mathematical ability of female, black, and hispanic students. Educational Researcher49(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19890577
10.
CrenshawK. (1990). Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1300. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
11.
EngleR. A.Langer-OsunaJ. M.RoystonM. M. de. (2014). Toward a model of influence in persuasive discussions: negotiating quality, authority, privilege, and access within a student-led argument. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.883979
12.
ErnestJ. B.ReinholzD. L.ShahN. (2019). Hidden competence: women’s mathematical participation in public and private classroom spaces. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09910-w
13.
FaulknerV. N.StiffL. V.MarshallP. L.NietfeldJ.CrosslandC. L. (2014). Race and teacher evaluations as predictors of algebra placement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(3), 288–311. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.3.0288
14.
FloresO. J.GunzenhauserM. G. (2021). Justice in the gaps: school leader dispositions and the use of data to address the opportunity gap. Urban Education, 56(2), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085918801431
15.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. Pantheon Books.
16.
GholsonM. L. (2016). Clean corners and algebra: A critical examination of the constructed invisibility of black girls and women in mathematics. The Journal of Negro Education, 85(3), 290–301. JSTOR.https://doi.org/10.7709/jnegroeducation.85.3.0290
17.
GoldinS.KhasnabisD.O’ConnorC., & HearnK. (2021). Tangling with race and racism in teacher education: designs for counterstory-based parent teacher conferences. Urban Education, 56(9), 1399–1428. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085919894042
18.
GutierrezR. (2002). Enabling the practice of mathematics teachers in context: toward a new equity research agenda. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2 & 3), 145–187. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL04023_4
19.
GutiérrezR. (2008). A “gap-gazing” fetish in mathematics education? Problematizing research on the achievement gap. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 357–364. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.39.4.0357
20.
HayesA. F.KrippendorffK. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450709336664
21.
IngM.WebbN. M.FrankeM. L.TurrouA. C.WongJ.ShinN.FernandezC. H. (2015). Student participation in elementary mathematics classrooms: the missing link between teacher practices and student achievement?Educational Studies in Mathematics, 90(3), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9625-z
22.
JacksonK. (2009). The social construction of youth and mathematics: the case of a fifth grade classroom. In MartinD. B. (Ed.), Mathematics teaching, learning, and liberation in the lives of black children (pp. 175–199). Routledge.
23.
JacksonK.GibbonsL.SharpeC. J. (2017). Teachers’ views of Students’ mathematical capabilities: challenges and possibilities for ambitious reform. Teachers College Record, 119(7), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711900708
24.
JettC. C. (2019). Mathematical persistence among four African American male graduate students: A critical race analysis of their experiences. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 50(3), 311–340. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.50.3.0311
25.
LappanG.FeyJ.FitzgeraldW. M.FrielS. N.PhillipsE. D. (2003). Connected mathematics. Pearson Prentice Hall.
26.
LarnellG. V.MartinD. B. (2021). Urban mathematics education as a political and personal project. In Handbook of urban education (2nd ed., pp. 355–368). Routledge.
27.
LeathS.MathewsC.HarrisonA.ChavousT. (2019). Racial identity, racial discrimination, and classroom engagement outcomes among black girls and boys in predominantly black and predominantly white school districts. American Educational Research Journal, 56(4), 1318–1352. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218816955
28.
LeyvaL. A. (2017). Unpacking the male superiority myth and masculinization of mathematics at the intersections: A review of research on gender in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(4), 397–433. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.4.0397
29.
LubienskiS. T.GanleyC. M. (2017). Research on gender and mathematics. In CaiJ. (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 649–666). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
30.
MartinD. B. (2012). Learning mathematics while black. Educational Foundations, 26(1-2), 47–66. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ968817
31.
MartinD. B.Rousseau-AndersonC.ShahN. (2017). Race and mathematics education. In CaiJ. (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 607–636). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
32.
MehanH. (1979). “What time is it, denise?”: asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory into Practice, 18(4), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405847909542846
MoschkovichJ. (2002). A situated and sociocultural perspective on bilingual mathematics learners. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2–3), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL04023_5
35.
NasirN. S.HandV.TaylorE. V. (2008). Culture and mathematics in school: boundaries between “cultural” and “domain” knowledge in the mathematics classroom and beyond. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 187–240. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07308962
O’ConnorC.MichaelsS.ChapinS.HarbaughA. G. (2017). The silent and the vocal: participation and learning in whole-class discussion. Learning and Instruction, 48, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.003
38.
PangV. O.HanP. P.PangJ. M. (2011). Asian American and pacific islander students: equity and the achievement gap. Educational Researcher, 40(8), 378–389. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11424222
39.
ReinholzD. L. (2022). Interrogating innate intelligence racial narratives: Students’ construction of counter-stories within the history of mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 8(1), 36–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-021-00145-w
40.
ReinholzD. L.JohnsonE.Andrews-LarsonC.Stone-JohnstoneA.SmithJ.MullinsB.FortuneN.KeeneK.ShahN. (2022). When active learning is inequitable: women’s participation predicts gender inequities in mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 53(3), 204–226. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0143
41.
ReinholzD. L.ShahN. (2018). Equity analytics: A methodological approach for quantifying participation patterns in mathematics classroom discourse. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(2), 140–177. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.2.0140
42.
ReinholzD. L.Stone-JohnstoneA.ShahN. (2020). Walking the walk: using classroom analytics to support instructors to address implicit bias in teaching. International Journal for Academic Development, 25(3), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2019.1692211
43.
Sengupta-IrvingT. (2021). Positioning and positioned apart: mathematics learning as becoming undesirable. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 52(2), 187–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/aeq.12378
44.
ShahN. (2017). Race, ideology, and academic ability: A relational analysis of racial narratives in mathematics. Teachers College Record, 119(7), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711900705
45.
ShahN.ChristensenJ. A.OrtizN. A.NguyenA.ByunS.StroupeD.ReinholzD. L. (2020). Racial hierarchy and masculine space: participatory in/equity in computational physics classrooms. Computer Science Education, 0(0), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1805285
46.
ShahN.Herbel-EisenmannB.ReinholzD. L. (2020). Why mrs. Stone never calls on debra: A case of race-gender ideology in practice. The Interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020, Volume 1 (pp. 1974–1981). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
47.
SnowD. A.BenfordR. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1(1), 197–217.
48.
SpeerN. M.WagnerJ. F. (2009). Knowledge needed by a teacher to provide analytic scaffolding during undergraduate mathematics classroom discussions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(5), 530–562. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.40.5.0530
49.
StinsonD. W. (2013). Negotiating the “white male math myth”: African American male students and success in school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 69–99. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0069
50.
TaylorJ.KyereE.KingЀ. (2021). A gardening metaphor: A framework for closing racial achievement gaps in American public education system. Urban Education, 56(9), 1547–1575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085918770721
51.
VoigtM.ReinholzD. L. (2020). Calculating queer acceptance and visibility: A literature synthesis on queer identity in mathematics. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/pumqe
WebsterM. (2016). A decomposition of the practices of high quality professional development facilitation for teachers. McGill University Libraries.
54.
WilkesC. E.BallD. L. (2020). Positioning, what do we know? An investigation of how black learners are positioned in mathematics classrooms and the role of intersectionality as an analytical tool for understanding why [preprint]. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/ycv34n
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
