Racial disproportionality in school discipline is an enduring systemic problem whose patterns change from one context to another. In order to develop systemic solutions that are responsive to local contexts, school stakeholders’ collective, agentic actions toward systemic changes are essential. Utilizing a participatory systemic design process led by an urban high school community, this case study examines how Learning Lab, an inclusive problem-solving process, fostered urban school stakeholders’ transformative agency. Through structured decision-making and collaborative design activity, Learning Lab participants analyzed systemic contradictions in the school discipline system and developed a culturally responsive behavioral support system to address racial disproportionality in discipline outcomes.
AnnammaS. A. (2018). The pedagogy of pathologization. Routledge.
2.
ArtilesA. J. (2019). Re-envisioning equity research: disability identification disparities as a case in point. Educational Researcher, 48(6), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19871949
BalA. (2018). Culturally responsive positive behavioral interventions and supports: A process–oriented framework for systemic transformation. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 40(2), 144–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714413.2017.1417579
5.
BalA.AfacanK.CakirH. I. (2018). Culturally responsive school discipline: implementing learning lab at a high school for systemic transformation. American Educational Research Journal, 55(5), 1007–1050. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218768796
6.
BalA.Betters-BubonJ.FishR. E. (2019). A multilevel analysis of statewide disproportionality in exclusionary discipline and the identification of emotional disturbance. Education and Urban Society, 51(2), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124517716260
7.
BalA.KozleskiE. B.SchraderE. M.RodriguezE. M.PeltonS. (2014). Systemic transformation from the ground–up: using learning lab to design culturally responsive schoolwide positive behavioral supports. Remedial and Special Education, 35(6), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514536995
BearG. G. (2010). From school discipline to self-discipline. Guilford.
10.
BellC.PuckettT. (2020). I want to learn but they won’t let me: exploring the impact of school discipline on academic achievement. Urban Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920968629
11.
BertrandM.DempsD. (2018). Youth participatory action research findings as mirror material. Mind. Culture, and Activity, 25(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2018.1434798
12.
BradshawC. P.MitchellM. M.O'BrennanL. M.LeafP. J. (2010). Multilevel exploration of factors contributing to the overrepresentation of black students in office disciplinary referrals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 508–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018450
13.
BrobbeyG. (2018). Punishing the vulnerable: exploring suspension rates for students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53(4), 216–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451217712953
14.
BrownC. A.DiTillioC. (2013). Discipline disproportionality among hispanic and American Indian students. Journal of Education and Learning, 2(4), 47–59. http://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v2n4p47
15.
CamangianP.CariagaS. (2021). Social and emotional learning is hegemonic miseducation: students deserve humanization instead. Race Ethnicity and Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2020.1798374
16.
CarterP. L.SkibaR.ArredondoM. I.PollockM. (2016). You can’t fix what you don’t look at: acknowledging race in addressing racial discipline disparities. Urban Education, 52(2), 207–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916660350
17.
Children’s Defense Fund (1975). School suspensions: Are they helping children?Washington Research Project.
18.
DayJ. K.SnappS. D.RussellS. T. (2016). Supportive, not punitive, practices reduce homophobic bullying and improve school connectedness. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 3(4), 416–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000195
19.
DumasM. J.NelsonJ. D. (2016). (Re)Imagining black boyhood. Harvard Educational Review, 86(1), 27–47.http://dx.doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.86.1.27
20.
EngeströmY. (2016). Studies in expansive learning. Cambridge University Press.
21.
EngeströmY.SanninoA. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002
22.
EngeströmY.SanninoA. (2020). From mediated actions to heterogenous coalitions: four generations of activity-theoretical studies of work and learning. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 28(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1806328
23.
EngeströmY.SanninoA.VirkkunenJ. (2014). On the methodological demands of formative interventions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2014.891868
24.
FabeloT.ThompsonM. D.PlotkinM.CarmichaelD.MarchbanksM. P.BoothE. A. (2011). Breaking schools’ rules. Council of State Governments Justice Center.
FreireP. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed, 30th anniversary edition (M. B. Ramos, trans.). Bloomsbury.
27.
GregoryA.SkibaR. J.MedirattaK. (2017). Eliminating disparities in school discipline: A framework for intervention. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 253–278. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X17690499
28.
GregoryA.SkibaR. J.NogueraP. A. (2010). The achievement gap and the discipline gap: Two sides of the same coin?Educational Researcher, 39(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20370
29.
GregoryA.ThompsonA. R. (2010). African American high school students and variability in behavior across classrooms. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(3), 386–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20370
30.
GutiérrezK. D.EngeströmY.SanninoA. (2016). Expanding educational research and interventionist methodologies. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1183347
31.
HaapasaariA.EngeströmY.KerosuoH. (2016). The emergence of learners’ transformative agency in a change laboratory intervention. Journal of Education and Work, 29(2), 232–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2014.900168
32.
HaapasaariA.KerosuoH. (2015). Transformative agency: The challenges of sustainability in a long chain of double stimulation. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 4, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.07.006
KirchgaslerC. (2018). True grit? Making a scientific object and pedagogical tool. American Educational Research Journal, 55(4), 693–720. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217752244
35.
KoD.BalA.Bird BearA.SanninoA.EngeströmY. (2021). Transformative agency for justice: addressing racial disparity of school discipline with the indigenous learning lab. Race Ethnicity and Education, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2021.1969903
36.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2021). I’m here for the hard re-set: post pandemic pedagogy to preserve our culture. Equity & Excellence in Education, 54(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2020.1863883
37.
LeeT.CornellD.GregoryA.FanX. (2011). High suspension schools and dropout rates for black and white students. Education and Treatment of Children, 34(2),167–192. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2011.0014
LordeA. (1984). Sister outsider. The Crossing Press.
40.
LosenD. J.HodsonC. L.Keith IIM. A.MorrisonK.BelwayS. (2015). Are we closing the school discipline gap?UCLA: The Civil Rights Project.
41.
LosenD. J.MartinezP. (2020). Lost opportunities: How disparate school discipline continues to drive differences in the opportunity to learn. Learning Policy Institute; Center for Civil Rights Remedies at the Civil Rights Project, UCLA.
42.
McloughlinC.NoltemeyerA. (2010). Research into factors contributing to discipline use and disproportionality in major urban schools. Current Issues in Education, 13(2).
43.
MilnerH. R. (2007). Race, culture, and researcher positionality: working through dangers seen, unseen, and unforeseen. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 388–400. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07309471
44.
MorenoG.GaytánF. X. (2013). Focus on latino learners: developing a foundational understanding of latino cultures to cultivate student success. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 57(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2013.731271
45.
NoltemeyerA.McloughlinC. S. (2010). Patterns of exclusionary discipline by school typology, ethnicity, and their interaction. Perspectives on Urban Education, 7(1), 27–40.
46.
PatelL. (2014). Countering coloniality in educational research: From ownership to answerability. Educational Studies, 50(4), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2014.924942
47.
PenuelW. R.GallagherD. J. (2017). Creating research-practice partnerships in education. Harvard Education Press.
48.
PenuelW. R.RiedyR.BarberM. S.PeurachD. J.LeBouefW. A.ClarkT. (2020). Principles of collaborative education research with stakeholders. Review of Educational Research, 90(5), 627–674. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320938126
49.
PerryB. L.MorrisE. W. (2014). Suspending progress: collateral consequences of exclusionary punishment in public schools. American Sociological Review, 79(6), 1067–1087. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312241455630
50.
RauschM. K.SkibaR. J. (2004). Doing discipline differently: The greenfield middle school story. Center for Evaluation and Education Policy.
51.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
52.
SandovalW. (2014). Conjecture mapping: An approach to systematic educational design research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.778204
SanninoA. (2015). The emergence of transformative agency and double stimulation. Learning. Culture and Social Interaction, 4, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.07.001
55.
SanninoA.EngeströmY.LemosM. (2016). Formative interventions for expansive learning and transformative agency. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 599–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1204547
56.
SkibaR. J.ChungC.-G.TrachokM.BakerT.SheyaA.HughesR. L. (2014). Parsing disciplinary disproportionality: Contributions of infraction, student, and school characteristics to out-of-school suspension and expulsion. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 640–670. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214541670
57.
SkibaR. J.HornerR. H.ChungC. G.RauschM. K.MayS. L.TobinT. (2011). Race is not neutral: A national investigation of African American and latino disproportionality in school discipline. School Psychology Review, 40(1), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2011.12087730
58.
SmolkowskiK.GirvanE. J.McintoshK.NeseR. N. T.HornerR. H. (2016). Vulnerable decision points for disproportionate office discipline referrals. Behavioral Disorders, 41(4), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.17988/bedi-41-04-178-195.1
59.
StakeR. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 443–466). Sage.
60.
TeferaA.ArtilesA. J.Kramarczuk VoulgaridesC.AylwardA.AlvaradoS. (under review). The aftermath of disproportionality citations: Situating disability-race intersections in historical and spatial contexts.
61.
VakilS.McKinney de RoystonM.Suad NasirN.KirshnerB. (2016). Rethinking race and power in design-based research. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1169817
62.
VirkkunenJ. (2006). Dilemmas in building shared transformative agency. Activités, 3, 44–66.
63.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University.
WhitfordD. K.Levine-DonnersteinD. (2014). Office disciplinary referral patterns of American Indian students from elementary school through high school. Behavioral Disorders, 39(2), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291303900204
66.
WinnM. T. (2018). Justice on both sides: transforming education through restorative justice. Harvard Education Press.
67.
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (2014a). Wisconsin information system for education data dashboard.
68.
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (2014b). Archived school staff: Salary, position, & demographic reports.
69.
YinR. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (6th Ed.). Sage.
