Safety has contributed to the growth of charter schools. However, charter schools may drain public schools of key resources, leading to a decline in safety in public schools. This study examines whether the opening of charter schools in New York City is associated with decreased safety in public schools. Results indicate very little or no difference in violent and non-violent offenses for public schools co-locating with charter schools and those within a quarter-mile and a half-mile of new charter schools. Charter schools in New York City may provide safer options without having a negative influence on safety in public schools.
AngristJ. D.PathakP. A.WaltersC. R. (2013). Explaining charter school effectiveness. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(4), 1–27.
2.
BellC. (2009). Geography in parental choice. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 493–521.
3.
BellC. A. (2007). Space and place: Urban parents’ geographical preferences for schools. The Urban Review, 39(4), 375–404.
4.
BerendsM. (2013). The evolving landscape of school choice. In MilnerR.LomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of Urban Education (pp. 451–473). Routledge.
5.
BerendsM. (2015). Sociology and school choice: What we know after two decades of charter schools. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 159–180.
6.
BettsJ. R.TangY. E. (2014). A meta-analysis of the literature on the effect of charter schools on student achievement. National Charter School Research Project, Center on Reinventing Public Education, University of Washington Bothell.
7.
BettingerE. P. (2005). The effect of charter schools on charter students and public schools. Economics of Education Review, 24(2), 133–147.
8.
BifulcoR.LaddH. F. (2005). Institutional change and coproduction of public services: The effect of charter schools on parental involvement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(4), 553–576.
9.
BifulcoR.LaddH. F.RossS. L. (2009). The effects of public school choice on those left behind: Evidence from Durham, North Carolina. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 130–149.
10.
BosettiL. (2004). Determinants of school choice: Understanding how parents choose elementary schools in Alberta. Journal of Education Policy, 19(4), 387–405.
11.
BrykA. S.SebringP. B.AllensworthE.EastonJ. Q.LuppescuS. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
12.
BuckleyJ.SchneiderM. (2009). Charter schools: Hope or hype?Princeton University Press.
13.
Burdick-WillJ.KeelsM.SchubleT. (2013). Closing and opening schools: The association between neighborhood characteristics and the location of new educational opportunities in a large urban district. Journal of Urban Affairs, 35(1), 59–80.
14.
ChengA.HittC.KisidaB.MillsJ. N. (2017). “No excuses” charter schools: A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence on student achievement. Journal of School Choice, 11(2), 209–238.
15.
ChristensenJ. (2007). School safety in urban charter and traditional public schools (NCSRP Working Paper# 2007-1). Center on Reinventing Public Education.
16.
CordesS. A. (2018). In pursuit of the common good: The spillover effects of charter schools on public school students in New York City. Education Finance and Policy, 13(4), 484–512.
17.
CornellD. G.MayerM. J. (2010). Why do school order and safety matter?Educational Researcher, 39(1), 7–15.
18.
CucchiaraM. B.HorvatE. M. (2014). Choosing selves: The salience of parental identity in the school choice process. Journal of Education Policy, 29(4), 486–509.
19.
DaviesS.AuriniJ. (2011). Exploring school choice in Canada: Who chooses what and why?Canadian Public Policy, 37(4), 459–477.
20.
DeAngelisC. A.LuekenM. F. (2020). School sector and climate: An analysis of K–12 safety policies and school climates in Indiana. Social Science Quarterly, 101(1), 376–405.
21.
DeniceP.GrossB. (2016). Choice, preferences, and constraints: Evidence from public school applications in Denver. Sociology of Education, 89(4), 300–320.
22.
DixsonA.RoyalC.HenryK. L. (2013). School reform and school choice. In MilnerR.LomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 474–503). Routledge.
23.
DobbieW.FryerR. G. (2011). Are high-quality schools enough to increase achievement among the poor? Evidence from the Harlem Children’s Zone. American Economic Journal, 3(3), 158–187.
FlemingD. J.CowenJ. M.WitteJ. F.WolfP. J. (2015). Similar students, different choices: Who uses a school voucher in an otherwise similar population of students?Education and Urban Society, 47(7), 785–812.
26.
GolannJ. W. (2015). The paradox of success at a no-excuses school. Sociology of Education, 88(2), 103–119.
27.
GrossB.DeArmondM.DeniceP. (2015). Common enrollment, parents, and school choice: Early evidence from Denver and New Orleans. Center on Reinventing Public Education.
28.
GrossB.YatskoS. (2016). Grappling with discipline in autonomous schools: New approaches from D.C. and New Orleans. Center on Reinventing Public Education.
29.
HaganJ.FosterH. (2012). Intergenerational educational effects of mass imprisonment in America. Sociology of Education, 85(3), 259–286.
30.
HamlinD. (2017). Are charter schools safer in deindustrialized cities with high rates of crime? Testing hypotheses in Detroit. American Educational Research Journal, 54(4), 725–756.
31.
HamlinD.DaviesS. (2016). Toronto: A new global city of learning. London Review of Education, 14(2), 186–198.
32.
HamlinD.LiA. (2020a). The relationship between parent volunteering in school and school safety in disadvantaged urban neighborhoods. Journal of School Violence, 19(3), 362–376.
33.
HamlinD.LiA. (2020b). Factors mediating school safety in charter schools: An analysis of five waves of nationally representative data. Journal of School Choice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2020.1783475
34.
HansonT.VoightA. (2014). The appropriateness of a California student and staff survey for measuring middle school climate (REL 2014-039). Regional Educational Laboratory West.
35.
HardingD. J. (2009). Collateral consequences of violence in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Social Forces, 88(2), 757–784.
36.
HilbeJ. M. (2011). Negative binomial regression. Cambridge University Press.
37.
HongJ. S.EspelageD. L. (2012). A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(4), 311–322.
38.
HowellW. G. (2004). Dynamic selection effects in means-tested, urban school voucher programs. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(2), 225–250.
39.
HoxbyC.MurarkaS. (2008). Methods for assessing achievement of students in charter schools. In BerendsM.SpringerM. G.WalbergH. J. (Eds.), Charter school outcomes (pp. 7–37). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40.
JabbarH. (2011). The behavioral economics of education: New directions for research. Educational Researcher, 40(9), 446–453.
41.
KirkD. S. (2009). Unraveling the contextual effects on student suspension and juvenile arrest: An examination of school, neighborhood, and family controls. Criminology, 47(2), 479–520.
42.
KirkD. S.SampsonR. J. (2011). Crime and the production of safe schools. In DuncanG. J.MurnaneR. J. (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 397–418). Russell Sage Foundation Press.
43.
KotokS.FrankenbergE.SchafftK. A.MannB. A.FullerE. J. (2017). School choice, racial segregation, and poverty concentration: Evidence from Pennsylvania charter school transfers. Educational Policy, 31(4), 415–447.
44.
LacoeJ. (2016). Too scared to learn? The academic consequences of feeling unsafe in the classroom. Urban Education, 55(10), 1385–1418.
45.
LacoeJ. R. (2015). Unequally safe: The race gap in school safety. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 13(2), 143–168.
46.
LeventhalT.Brooks-GunnJ. (2004). A randomized study of neighborhood effects on low-income children’s educational outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 40(4), 488–507.
47.
MarantoR.RitterG. (2014). Why KIPP is not corporate: KIPP and social justice. Journal of School Choice, 8(2), 237–257.
48.
NeimanS.HillM. R. (2011). Crime, violence, discipline, and safety in US public schools: Findings from the school survey on crime and safety, 2009-2010. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.
NiY. (2009). The impact of charter schools on the efficiency of traditional public schools: Evidence from Michigan. Economics of Education Review, 28(5), 571–584.
53.
OzerE. J.WeinsteinR. S. (2004). Urban adolescents’ exposure to community violence: The role of support, school safety, and social constraints in a school-based sample of boys and girls. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33(3), 463–476.
54.
RenzulliL. A.BarrA. B.PainoM. (2015). Innovative education? A test of specialist mimicry or generalist assimilation in trends in charter school specialization over time. Sociology of Education, 88(1), 83–102.
55.
RenzulliL. A.EvansL. (2005). School choice, charter schools, and White flight. Social Problems, 52(3), 398–418.
56.
RipskiM. B.GregoryA. (2009). Unfair, unsafe, and unwelcome: Do high school students’ perceptions of unfairness, hostility, and victimization in school predict engagement and achievement?Journal of School Violence, 8(4), 355–375.
57.
RobersS.ZhangA.MorganR. E.Musu-GilletteL. (2015). Indicators of School crime and safety: 2014 (NCES 2015–072/NCJ 248036). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, and Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
58.
RoseB. A.SteinM. L. (2014). Mechanisms for teacher outreach to parents in charter and traditional public schools. Journal of School Choice, 8(4), 589–617.
59.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68.
SampsonR. J. (2012). Neighborhood inequality, violence, and the social infrastructure of the American city. In: TateW. F. (Ed.), Research on schools, neighborhoods, and communities: Toward civic responsibility (pp. 11–28). Roman & Littlefield & American Educational Research Association.
62.
SchneiderM.TeskeP.MarschallM. (2000). Choosing schools: Consumer choice and the quality of American schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63.
SchreckC. J.MillerJ. M. (2003). Sources of fear of crime at school: What is the relative contribution of disorder, individual characteristics, and school security?Journal of School Violence, 2(4), 57–79.
64.
SinhaV.PayneM. R.CookT. D. (2005). A multidimensional approach to understanding neighborhood schools and their potential impact. Urban Education, 40(6), 627–662.
65.
SkoganW. (2015). Disorder and decline: The state of research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52(4), 464–485.
66.
SmithJ.WohlstetterP.KuzinC. A.De PedroK. (2011). Parent involvement in urban charter schools: New strategies for increasing participation. School Community Journal, 21(1), 71–94.
67.
StewartT.WolfP. J. (2012). Understanding school shoppers in Detroit. Qwaku & Associates for Michigan Future.
68.
StoddardC.CorcoranS. P. (2007). The political economy of school choice: Support for charter schools across states and school districts. Journal of Urban Economics, 62(1), 27–54.
69.
TuttleC.GillB.GleasonP.KnechtelV.Nichols-BarrerI.ReschA. (2013). KIPP middle schools: Impacts on achievement and other outcomes. Mathematica Policy Research.
WhitmanD. (2008). Sweating the small stuff: Inner-city schools and the new paternalism. Thomas B. Fordham Foundation & Institute.
72.
WiebeD. J.GuoW.AllisonP. D.AndersonE.RichmondT. S.BranasC. C. (2013). Fears of violence during morning travel to school. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(1), 54–61.
73.
WilsonE. J.MarshallJ.WilsonR.KrizekK. J. (2010). By foot, bus or car: Children’s school travel and school choice policy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 42(9), 2168–2185.
74.
YettickH. (2016). Information is bliss: Information use by school choice participants in Denver. Urban Education, 51(8), 859–890.
75.
ZimmerR. W.GuarinoC. M. (2013). Is there empirical evidence that charter schools “push out” low-performing students?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(4), 461–480.
