Building upon a Freirean notion of dialogic education, the purpose of this multi-case study was to explore what happened when secondary science teachers came together with Latinx parents for their children’s science learning in the context of a community-based science learning program. Constant comparative analysis of data revealed similarities and differences among the cases that were analyzed in three categories: recognition, adaptation, and pro-action. Implications are that in-depth exposure to content-based cultural immersion programs with parents can be beneficial for teachers to cultivate a broader vision of science (and other content area) teaching linked to students’ lives and communities.
AikenheadG. S.BrokofskyJ.BodnarT.ClarkC.FoleyC.HingleyJ.StrangeG. (2014). Enhancing school science with indigenous knowledge: What we know from teachers and research. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada: Saskatoon Public Schools.
2.
AuerbachS. (2007). From moral supporters to struggling advocates: Reconceptualizing parent roles in education through the experience of working-class families of color. Urban Education, 42, 250-283.
3.
BuxtonC. A.Allexsaht-SniderM.KayumovaS.AghasalehR.ChoiY.CohenA. (2015). Teacher agency and professional learning: Rethinking fidelity of implementation as multiplicities of enactment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 489-502.
4.
BuxtonC. A.Allexsaht-SniderM.RiveraC. (2012). Science, language, and families: Constructing a model of steps to college through language-rich science inquiry. In BianchiniJ.AkersonV.Calabrese-BartonA.LeeO.RodriguezA. (Eds.), Moving the equity agenda forward: Equity research, practice, and policy in science education (pp. 241-250). New York, NY: Springer.
5.
Calabrese-BartonA.TanE.GreenbergD. (2017). The makerspace movement: Sites of possibilities for equitable opportunities to engage underrepresented youth in STEM. Teachers College Record, 119(6), 11-44.
ChinnP. W. (2015). Place and culture-based professional development: Cross-hybrid learning and the construction of ecological mindfulness. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10, 121-134.
8.
DabachD. B.Suárez-OrozcoC.HernandezS. J.BrooksM. D. (2018). Future perfect? Teachers’ expectations and explanations of their Latino immigrant students’ postsecondary futures. Journal of Latinos and Education, 17, 38-52.
9.
DixonT. L.WilliamsC. L. (2015). The changing misrepresentation of race and crime on network and cable news. Journal of Communication, 65, 24-39.
10.
EvansM. P. (2013). Educating preservice teachers for family, school, and community engagement. Teaching Education, 24, 123-133.
11.
FlechaR.SolerM. (2013). Turning difficulties into possibilities: Engaging Roma families and students in school through dialogic learning. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43, 451-465.
12.
FloresG. M. (2011). Latino/as in the hard sciences: Increasing Latina/o participation in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) related fields. Latino Studies, 9, 327-335.
13.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
14.
FreireP. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
15.
FreireP. (2005). Teachers as cultural workers: Letters to those who dare teach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
16.
FreireP. (2007). Daring to dream: Toward a pedagogy of the unfinished. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
17.
FreireP. (2013). Education for critical consciousness. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.
18.
FreireP.MacedoD. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
19.
GalloS.WorthamS.BennettI. (2015). Increasing “parent involvement” in the New Latino Diaspora. In HamannE. T.WorthamS.Murillo, Jr.E. (Eds.), Revisiting education in the new Latino diaspora (pp. 263-282). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
20.
GandaraP. C.ContrerasF. (2009). The Latino education crisis: The consequences of failed social policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
GarcíaO.KleifgenJ. A.FalchiL. (2008). From English language learners to emergent bilinguals (Equity Matters: Research Review No. 1). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED524002.pdf
GirouxH. A. (2014). When schools become dead zones of the imagination: A critical pedagogy manifesto. Policy Futures in Education, 12, 491-499.
25.
GonzalezN.MollL. C.AmantiC. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
HamannE.HarklauL. (2015). Revisiting education in the new Latino diaspora. In HamannE.WorthamS.Murillo, Jr.E. (Eds.), Revisiting education in the new Latino diaspora (pp. 153-170). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
27.
HammondL. (2001). Notes from California: An anthropological approach to urban science education for language minority families. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 983-999.
28.
JohnsonE. J. (2014). From the classroom to the living room: Eroding academic inequities through home visits. Journal of School Leadership, 24, 357-385.
29.
MappK., (2012). Title I and parent involvement: Lessons from the past, recommendations for the future. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
30.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31.
MollL. C.AmantiC.NeffD.GonzalezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132-141.
32.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Promoting the educational success of children and youth learning English: Promising futures. Washington, DC: Author.
33.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). English learners in STEM subjects: Transforming classrooms, schools, and lives. Washington, DC: Author.
34.
NietoS. (2013). Language, literacy, and culture: Aha! moments in personal and sociopolitical understanding. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 9, 8-20.
35.
NietoS. (Ed.). (2014). Why we teach now. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
36.
ParkerK.HorowitzJ.BrownA.FryR.D’Vera Cohn. (2018). What unites and divides urban, suburban and rural communities. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
37.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation reports. Newbury park, CA: SAGE.
38.
RamirezO.McColloughC. A.DiazZ. (2016). Creating a model of acceptance: Preservice teachers interact with non-English-speaking Latino parents using culturally relevant mathematics and science activities at family learning events. School Science and Mathematics, 116, 43-54.
39.
SchecterS. R.SherriD. L. (2009). Value added? Teachers’ investments in and orientations toward parent involvement in education. Urban Education, 44, 59-87.
40.
SleeterC. E. (2012). Confronting the marginalization of culturally responsive pedagogy. Urban Education, 47, 562-584.
41.
UpadhyayB. (2009). Teaching science for empowerment in an urban classroom: A case study of a Hmong teacher. Equity & Excellence in Education, 42, 217-232.
42.
ValenciaR. R. (2015). Students of color and the achievement gap: Systemic challenges, systemic transformations. New York, NY: Routledge.
43.
WassellB. A.HawrylakM. F.ScantleburyK. (2017). Barriers, resources, frustrations, and empathy: Teachers’ expectations for family involvement for Latino/a ELL students in urban STEM classrooms. Urban Education, 52, 1233-1254.
YossoT. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8, 69-91.
46.
YuenT. T.BonnerE. P.Arregun-AndersonM. G. (2018). (Under)Represented Latin@ s in STEM: Increasing participation throughout education and the workplace. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
47.
ZeichnerK.BowmanM.GuillenL.NapolitanK. (2016). Engaging and working in solidarity with local communities in preparing the teachers of their children. Journal of Teacher Education, 67, 277-290.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
