Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The cultivation of interdisciplinary thinking has gradually become the key direction of science education, however, the interdisciplinary teaching method is still not widely used in the current classroom. Especially in urban areas, where schools serve as the forefront of educational innovation and have diverse student bodies, the need for interdisciplinary teaching is crucial for addressing educational disparities and advancing scientific literacy. The current teacher professional development method cannot meet the needs of inclusive urban school teachers to improve their interdisciplinary teaching skills. For a developing country like China with a large population and significant regional differences, it has greater value in educational equity from the perspective of inclusive education to find how teacher professional development affects interdisciplinary teaching skills. Urban schools, as the forefront of educational innovation, offer a critical setting to examine these effects due to their concentration of resources and diverse student bodies, which are pivotal for addressing educational disparities and advancing scientific literacy. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the impact of China’s urban primary school science teachers’ professional development on interdisciplinary teaching skills from the perspective of inclusive education. The study used structural equation modeling and path analysis methods to explore the relationship between teachers’ professional development and interdisciplinary teaching skill with science professional knowledge, science epistemological beliefs, and science teaching beliefs as mediating variables. The findings indicated that teacher professional development had a significant positive predictive effect on interdisciplinary teaching skill, while science professional knowledge, science epistemological beliefs, and science pedagogical beliefs played a significant mediating role between teacher professional development and interdisciplinary teaching. The results of this study have important practical significance for promoting the professional development of urban primary school science teachers and improving interdisciplinary teaching skills. This study puts forward suggestions in the areas of the development mechanism of inclusive professional development of science teachers, the cultivation of interdisciplinary skills, and the enhancement of teachers’ teaching beliefs.

Keywords

inclusive education science teachers professional development interdisciplinary teaching skills

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alake-Tuenter

Biemans

H. J. A.

Tobi

Wals

A. E. J.

Oosterheert

Mulder

(2012). Inquiry-based science education competencies of primary school teachers: A literature study and critical review of the American national science education standards. International Journal of Science Education, 34(17), 2609–2640.

Alonzo

A. C.

Kobarg

Seidel

(2012). Pedagogical content knowledge as reflected in teacher-student interactions: Analysis of two video cases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(10), 1211–1239.

Aranda

M. L.

Lie

Selcen Guzey

(2020). Productive thinking in middle school science students’ design conversations in a design-based engineering challenge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(1), 67–81.

Barr

D. J.

Boulay

Selman

R. L.

Mccormick

Lowenstein

Gamse

Fine

Leonard

M. B.

(2015). A randomized controlled trial of professional development for interdisciplinary civic education: Impacts on humanities teachers and their students. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 117(2), 1–52.

Bartels

S. L.

Rupe

K. M.

Lederman

J. S.

(2019). Shaping preservice teachers’ understandings of STEM: A collaborative math and science methods approach. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(6), 666–680.

Borko

(2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the Terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.

Bruce

C. D.

Esmonde

Ross

Dookie

Beatty

(2010). The effects of sustained classroom-embedded teacher professional learning on teacher efficacy and related student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1598–1608.

Bryk

A. S.

(2010). Organizing schools for improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(7), 23–30.

Chang

C. K.

(2022). Interdisciplinary teaching of junior high school language under self-efficacy theory - An example of The Language of Nature. Gansu Education Research, 4, 81–84.

10.

Chen

Y.-H.

Jang

S.-J.

Chen

P.-J.

(2015). Using wikis and collaborative learning for science teachers’ professional development. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(4), 330–344.

11.

Chiu

T. K. F.

Chai

C. S.

Williams

P. J.

Lin

T.-J.

(2021). Teacher professional development on self-determination theory–based design thinking in STEM education. Educational Technology & Society, 24(4), 153–165.

12.

Creamer

E. G.

Lattuca

L.R.

(eds.) (2005). New Directions for Teaching and Learning (No. 102). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

13.

Dasgupta

Magana

A. J.

Vieira

(2019). Investigating the affordances of a CAD enabled learning environment for promoting integrated STEM learning. Computers & Education, 129, 122–142.

14.

Erdmann

Miller

Stains

(2020). Exploring STEM postsecondary instructors’ accounts of instructional planning and revisions. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 1–17.

15.

Eren-Şişman

E. N.

Çiğdemoğlu

Kanlı

Köseoğlu

(2020). Science teachers’ professional development about science centers. Science & Education, 29(5), 1255–1290.

16.

Fan

S.-C.

K.-C.

(2017). How an integrative STEM curriculum can benefit students in engineering design practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1), 107–129.

17.

Fauth

Decristan

Decker

A.-T.

Büttner

Hardy

Klieme

Kunter

(2019). The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102882.

18.

Förtsch

Werner

Neuhaus

B. J.

(2018). Effects of high-complexity and high-cognitive-level instructional tasks in biology lessons on students’ factual and conceptual knowledge. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(3), 353–374.

19.

Gao

Shen

Sun

(2020). Reviewing assessment of student learning in interdisciplinary STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1.

20.

Gardner

Glassmeyer

Worthy

(2019). Impacts of STEM professional development on teachers’ knowledge, self-efficacy, and practice. In Frontiers in Education, 4, 26.

21.

Grossman

P. L.

(2012). Why models matter : An alternate view on professional growth in teaching, 62(2), 171–179.

22.

Handtke

Bögeholz

(2019). Self-efficacy beliefs of interdisciplinary science teaching (SElf-ST) instrument: Drafting a theory-based measurement. Education Sciences, 9(4), 247.

23.

Honey

Pearson

Schweingruber

(2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. In National Academies Press. National Academies Press.

24.

Howlett

Ferreira

J.-A.

Blomfield

(2016). Teaching sustainable development in higher education: Building critical, reflective thinkers through an interdisciplinary approach. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 17(3), 305–321.

25.

Jimoyiannis

(2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1259–1269.

26.

Jin

(2013). The turn towards continuing teacher education in developed countries and its implications. Research in Educational Development, 33(4), 37–42+47.

27.

Kaymakamoğlu

S. E.

(2017). Science teachers’ conceptualizations and implications for the development of the professional development programs. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3301–3314.

28.

Kleickmann

Tröbst

Jonen

Vehmeyer

Möller

(2016). The effects of expert scaffolding in elementary science professional development on teachers’ beliefs and motivations, instructional practices, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(1), 21–42.

29.

Koehler

M. J.

Mishra

(2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.

30.

Lakshmanan

Heath

B. P.

Perlmutter

Elder

(2011). The impact of science content and professional learning communities on science teaching efficacy and standards-based instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 534–551.

31.

Lee

P.-H.

Pan

Hsu

W.-T.

(2024). Urban-rural differences in TGfU-based physical education at Taiwanese primary schools from the perspective of cultural capital. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2024.2413050. Published online October 2024. Indexed October 12, 2024.

32.

Lindvig

Ulriksen

(2020). Different, difficult, and local: A review of interdisciplinary teaching activities. Review of Higher Education, 43(2), 698–717.

33.

Markauskaite

Goodyear

(2017). Epistemic fluency and professional education (Vol. 14). Springer Netherlands.

34.

National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

35.

Nguyen

G. N. H.

Bower

(2018). Novice teacher technology-enhanced learning design practices: The case of the silent pedagogy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 1027–1043.

36.

Richter

Kunter

Lüdtke

Klusmann

Anders

Baumert

(2013). How different mentoring approaches affect beginning teachers’ development in the first years of practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 166–177.

37.

Sinclair

B. B.

Naizer

Ledbetter

(2011). Observed Implementation of a Science Professional Development Program for K-8 Classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(7), 579–594.

38.

Swars

S. L.

Dooley

C. M.

(2010). Changes in teaching efficacy during a professional development school-based science methods course. School Science and Mathematics, 110(4), 193–202.

39.

Timperley

Wilson

Barrar

(2008). Teacher professional learning and development (Vol. 18). International Academy of Education.

40.

Van Driel

J. H.

De Jong

Verloop

(2002). The development of preservice chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 86(4), 572–590.

41.

Wilson

S. M.

(2013). Professional development for science teachers. Science, 340(6130), 310–313.

42.

Wright

Bates

Loughlin

Clarke

Hale

(2022). Exploring the professionalisation of further education teachers in England. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 27(2), 289–306.

43.

Yang

Liu

Gardella

J. A.

(2020). Effects of a professional development program on science teacher knowledge and practice, and student understanding of interdisciplinary science concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(7), 1028–1057.

44.

(2018). The impact of culturally inclusive pedagogy on student achievement in a multicultural urban school setting. Urban Education, 57(1), 135–153.

45.

Zheng

Y. H.

(2023). The current situation, influence and analysis of the primary school science teacher team in china suggestion: Based on large-scale research in 31 provinces[我国小学科学教师队伍现状、影响与建议：基于31 个省份的大规模调研]. Journal of East China Normal University (Education Science Edition), 41(4), 1–21.

46.

Zhou

Liu

(2021). Factors influencing K-12 STEM teachers’ interdisciplinary teaching competency. 2021 Tenth International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT), 88–94.

47.

Zhu

Peng

(2023). An empirical study of an interdisciplinary teaching literacy assessment model for teachers[教师跨学科教学素养测评模型实证研究]. Journal of East China Normal University (Education Science Edition), 41(2), 1–13.

A Study on the Impact of Professional Development of Urban Primary School’s Science Teachers on Interdisciplinary Teaching in China

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References