A mixed-methods approach of sequential explanatory strategy was used to explore experiences of 37 students related to an Early College Academy (ECA) program and their high schools. Data consisted of mixed survey with scaled and open-ended questions followed by in-depth interviews with 12 students. Findings suggested students benefited from the meritocracy of the ECA program leaving many of their peers behind. Several expressed concerns about chaotic high school environments and neoliberal practices of didactic teaching in both settings. The challenge is to provide access to college for more students and transform neoliberal practices at all levels of schooling.
BaileyT. R.AverianovaI. E. (2000). Multiple missions of community colleges: Conflicting or complementary? Columbia University Academic Commons. doi:10.7916/D8Z899GW
2.
BaltodanoM. P. (2017). The power brokers of neoliberalism: Philanthrocapitalists and public education. Policy Futures in Education, 15, 141-156.
3.
BerryT. R. (2005). Black on black education: Personally engaged pedagogy for/by African American preservice teachers. The Urban Review, 37, 31-48. doi:10.1007/s11256-005-3560-8
4.
CaruthersL.FriendJ. (2016). Great expectations: What kids want from our urban public schools. Forward by Gloria Ladson-Billings, Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
5.
ClandininD. J.ConnellyF. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
ConnellyF. M.ClandininD. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2-14.
7.
CostiganA. T. (2013). New urban teachers transcending neoliberal educational reforms: Embracing aesthetic education as a curriculum of political action. Urban Education, 48, 116-148.
8.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
DeeT. S. (2004). Teachers, race, and student achievement in a randomized experiment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 195-210.
10.
del Carmen SalazarM. (2013). A humanizing pedagogy reinventing the principles and practice of education as a journey toward liberation. Review of Research in Education, 37, 121-148.
11.
DenzinN. K. (1989). Interpretive interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
EgaliteA.KisidaB.WintersM. (2015). Representation in the classroom: The effect of own-race teachers on student achievement. Economics on Education Review, 45, 44-52.
13.
EllingsonL. L. (2014). “The truth must dazzle gradually”: Enriching relationship research using a crystallization framework. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 442-450.
14.
FreemanJ.SimonsenB. (2015). Examining the impact of policy and practice interventions on high school dropout and school completion rates: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 85, 205-248.
15.
FreireP. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed (Rev. ed.). New York: Continuum.
16.
GanzelB. L.MorrisP. (2011). Allostasis and the developing human brain: Explicit consideration of implicit models. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 955-974.
17.
GayG. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
18.
GirouxH. A. (2013a). Can democratic education survive in a neoliberal society?. In ReitzC. (Ed.), Crisis and commonwealth: Marcuse, Marx, McLaren (pp. 137-152). New York, NY: Lexington Books.
19.
GirouxH. A. (2013b). Neoliberalism’s war against teachers in dark times. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13, 458-468.
20.
GirouxH. A. (2015). Against the terror of neoliberalism: Politics beyond the age of greed. New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
GirouxH. A. (2016). When schools become dead zones of the imagination: A critical pedagogy manifesto. The High School Journal, 99, 351-359.
22.
GrbichC. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
HallinanM. T. (2008). Teacher influences on students’ attachment to school. Sociology of education, 81(3), 271-283.
HohleR. (2015). Race and the origins of American neoliberals. New York, NY: Routledge.
26.
HurshD. (2014). Market ideologies and the undermining of democracy. In HallJ. (Ed.), Underprivileged school children and the assault on dignity (pp. 19-47). New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
IngersollR.MayH.CollinsG. (2017, September). Minority Teacher Recruitment, Employment, and Retention: 1987-2013. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
28.
JardineG. M. (2005). Foucault & education. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
29.
JehangirR. (2010). Stories as knowledge: Bringing the lived experience of first-generation college students into the academy. Urban Education, 45, 533-553.
30.
JeraldC. D.HaycockK.WilkinsA. (2009). Fighting for quality and equality, too: How state policymakers can ensure the drive to improve teacher quality doesn’t just trickle down to poor and minority children. Washington, DC: Education Trust. Routledge.
31.
JohnsonA. W. (2013). “Turnaround” as shock therapy: Race, neoliberalism, and school reform. Urban Education, 48, 232-256.
32.
JoselowskyF. (2007). Youth engagement, high school reform, and improved learning outcomes: Building systemic approaches for youth engagement. NASSP Bulletin, 91, 257-276.
33.
KenaG.Musu-GilletteL.RobinsonJ.WangX.RathbunA.ZhangJ.VelezE. (2015). The condition of education 2015 (NCES 2015-144). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2015144
34.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2014). The pedagogy of poverty: The big lies about poor children. In GorskiP. C.ZenkovK. (Eds.), The big lies of school reform: Finding better solutions for the future of public education (pp. 7-16). New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
LardierD. T.Jr.HerrK. G.BarriosV. R.Garcia-ReidP.ReidR. J. (2019). Merit in meritocracy: Uncovering the myth of exceptionality and self-reliance through the voices of urban youth of color. Education and Urban Society, 51, 474-500.
36.
LevinJ. S. (2007). Nontraditional students and community colleges: The conflict of justice and neoliberalism. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
37.
LevinJ. S.AliyevaA. (2015). Embedded neoliberalism within faculty behaviors. The Review of Higher Education, 38, 537-563.
38.
MacNeilA. J.PraterD. L.BuschS. (2009). The effects of school culture and climate on student achievement. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12, 73-84.
39.
McLarenP. (2007). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
40.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
MilnerH. R. (2012). But what is urban education?Urban Education, 43, 556-561.
42.
MilnerH. R. (2013). Rethinking achievement gap talk in urban education. Urban Education, 48, 3-8.
43.
MitraD. L. (2005). Adults advising youth: Leading while getting out of the way. Education Administration Quarterly, 41, 520-553.
NietoS. (2010). Language, culture, and teaching: Critical perspectives (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
46.
NietoS. (2016). Foreword. In ValenzuelaA. (Ed.), Growing critically conscious teachers (pp. ix-xi). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
47.
RavitchD. (2013). Reign of error: The hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to America’s public schools. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
48.
SchostakJ. (2012). Schooling and education under neoliberalism. Power and Education, 4(3), 251-256.
49.
SchwartzS. E.KanchewaS. S.RhodesJ. E.GowdyG.StarkA. M.HornJ. P.. . .SpencerR. (2018). “I’m having a little struggle with this, can you help me out?” Examining impacts and processes of a social capital intervention for first-generation college students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 61, 166-178.
50.
SeidelJ. V. (1998). Qualitative data analysis (Ethnograph 6.0) [Computer software]. Colorado Springs, CO: Qualis Research.
51.
SleeterC. E. (2014). Multiculturalism and education for citizenship in a context of neoliberalism. Intercultural Education, 25, 85-94.
52.
SleeterC. E. (2017). Critical race theory and the whiteness of teacher education. Urban Education, 52, 155-169.
53.
SteinbergA.AllenL. (2011). Putting off-track youths back on track to college. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(5), 21-26.
ValenzuelaA. (2016). Growing critically conscious teachers. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
58.
Van HoutteM. (2005). Climate or culture? A plea for conceptual clarity in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, 71-89.
59.
VargasJ. M.MillerM. S. (2011). Early college designs: An increasingly popular college-readiness strategy for school districts to reach more traditionally underserved students. The School Administrator, 68(6), 18-25.
60.
VegaD.MooreJ. L.IIIMirandaA. H. (2015). In their own words: Perceived barriers to achievement by African American and Latino high school students. American Secondary Education, 43(3), 36-59.
61.
Wadsworth school district (2016). School profile data. Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
62.
Wadsworth school district (2019). School profile data. Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
63.
WarrenC. A. (2015). Conflicts and contradictions: Conceptions of empathy and the work of good-intentioned early career White female teachers. Urban Education, 50, 572-600. doi:0042085914525790
WebbP. T.BriscoeF. M.MussmanM. P. (2009). Preparing teachers for the neoliberal panopticon. Educational Foundations, 23(3-4), 3-18.
66.
YangC.BearG. G.MayH. (2018). Multilevel associations between school-wide social-emotional learning approach and student engagement across elementary, middle, and high schools. School Psychology Review, 47, 45-61.
67.
ZhaoY. (2015). A world at risk: An imperative for a paradigm shift to cultivate 21st century learners. Society, 52(2), 129-135.
