This article addresses what we are calling “the gaps,” the divergent and contextual understandings of “opportunity gap” and “achievement gap” evident in interviews with principals and school district leaders. Drawing from a sample of 22 interviews in urban, inner-ring suburban, and outer-ring suburban schools in a northeastern state, we explore how school leaders define the “gaps,” use data (in its many forms) to pose questions and construct solutions, and position themselves. Analysis unearthed varied dispositions among the school leaders about how to frame gaps in achievement and opportunity, varied capacities to address these gaps, and varied leadership responses.
AlcoffL. M. (1988). Cultural feminism versus post-structuralism: The identity crisis in feminist theory. Signs, 13, 405-436.
2.
ArmstrongJ.AnthesK. (2001). How data can help. American School Board Journal, 188(11), 38-41.
3.
BernhardtV. L. (2000). Intersections: New routes open when one type of data crosses another. Journal of Staff Development, 21(1), 33-36.
4.
BernhardtV. L. (2003). No schools left behind. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 26-30.
5.
BoykinA. W.NogueraP. (2011). Creating the opportunity to learn: Moving from research to practice to close the achievement gap. Alexandria, VA: The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
6.
BrooksJ. S.Jean-MarieG.NormoreA. H.HodginsD. W. (2007). Distributed leadership for social justice: Exploring how influence and equity are stretched over an urban high school. Journal of School Leadership, 17, 378-408.
7.
BrownK. M. (2004a). Assessing preservice leaders’ beliefs, attitudes, and values regarding issues of diversity, social justice, and equity: A review of existing measures. Equity & Excellence in Education, 37, 332-342.
8.
BrownK. M. (2004b). Leadership for social justice and equity: Weaving a transformative framework and pedagogy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 77-108.
9.
CapperC. A.TheoharisG.SebastianJ. (2006). Toward a framework for preparing leaders for social justice. Journal of Educational Administration, 44, 209-224.
10.
CarnoyM.ElmoreR.SiskinL. S. (Eds.). (2003). The new accountability: High schools and high-stakes testing. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
11.
CarterP. L. (2009). Equity and empathy: Toward racial and educational achievement in the Obama era. Harvard Educational Review, 79, 387-297.
12.
CarterP. L.WelnerK. G. (2013). Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give all children an even chance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
ChoV.WaymanJ. C. (2014). Districts’ efforts for data use and computer data systems: The role of sensemaking in system use and implementation. Teachers College Record, 116(2), 1-45.
14.
ChrispeelsJ. (1992). Purposeful restructuring: Creating a culture for learning and achievement in elementary school. Washington, DC: RoutledgeFalmer.
15.
CoplandM. A.KnappM. S.SwinnertonJ. A. (2008). Principal leadership, data, and school improvement. In KowalskiT. J.LasleyT. J. (Eds.), Handbook of data-based decision making in education (pp. 153-172). New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
CreswellJ. W. (2006). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
CrottyM. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Darling-HammondL. (2013). Inequality and school resources: What it will take to close the opportunity gap. In CarterP. L.WelnerK. G. (Eds.), Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give all children an even chance (pp. 77-97). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19.
DatnowA.ParkV.WohlstetterP. (2007). Achieving with data: How high-performing school systems use data to improve instruction for elementary students. Los Angeles: Center on Educational Governance University of Southern California.
20.
DelpitL. (2006). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York, NY: The New Press.
21.
DiamondJ. B. (2006). Still separate and unequal: Examining race, opportunity, and school achievement in “integrated” suburbs. The Journal of Negro Education, 75, 495-505.
22.
EarlL.FullanM. (2003). Using data in leadership for learning. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33, 383-394.
23.
EarlL.KatzS. (2002). Leading schools in a data-rich world. In LeithwoodK. A.HallingerP. (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 1003-1024). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
24.
EmersonR. M.FetzR. I.ShawL. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
EnglishF. W. (2002). On the intractability of the achievement gap in urban schools and the discursive practice of continuing racial discrimination. Education and Urban Society, 34, 298-311.
26.
FeldmanJ.TungR. (2001). Whole school reform: How schools use the data-based inquiry and decision making process. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
27.
FergusonA. A. (2001). Bad boys: Public schools in the making of black masculinity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
28.
FloresA. (2007). Examining disparities in mathematics education: Achievement gap or opportunity gap?The High School Journal, 91(1), 29-42.
29.
FusarelliL. D. (2004). The potential impact of the No Child Left Behind Act on equity and diversity in American education. Educational Policy, 18, 71-94.
30.
GallagherL.MeansB.PadillaC. (2008). Teachers’ use of student data systems to improve instruction: 2005 to 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
31.
GerzonN. (2015). Structuring professional learning to develop a culture of data use: Aligning knowledge from the field and research findings. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1-28.
32.
GillB.BordenB. C.HallgrenK. (2014). A conceptual framework for data-driven decision making (Report submitted to Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation). Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.
33.
HallingerP.BickmanL.DavisK. (1996). School context, principal leadership, and student reading achievement. Elementary School Journal, 96, 527-549.
34.
HowardT. C. (2010). Why race and culture matter in schools: Closing the achievement gap in America’s classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
35.
HuguleyJ.KakliZ.RaoR. (2007). The opportunity gap: Achievement and inequality in education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Review.
36.
JacksonB. L.KelleyC. (2002). Exceptional and innovative programs in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 192-212.
37.
JimersonJ. B.WaymanJ. C. (2015). Professional learning for using data: Examining teacher needs and supports. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1-36.
38.
JohnsonJ. F.UlineC. L. (2005). Preparing educational leaders to close achievement gaps. Theory Into Practice, 44, 45-52.
39.
JohnsonL. (2007). Rethinking successful school leadership in challenging U.S. schools: Culturally responsive practices in school-community relationships. International Studies in Educational Administration, 35(3), 49-57.
40.
JohnsonR. S. (2002). Using data to close the achievement gap: How to measure equity in our schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
41.
KantorH.LoweR. (2013). Educationalizing the welfare state and privatizing education: The evolution of social policy since the New Deal. In CarterP. L.WelnerK. G. (Eds.), Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give every child an even chance (pp. 25-39). Oxford, UK: Oxford Press.
42.
KatzS.DackL. A. (2013). Toward a culture of inquiry for data use in schools: Breaking down professional learning barriers through intentional interruption. Studies in Education Evaluation, 42, 35-40.
43.
KerrK. A.MarshJ. A.IkemotoG. S.DarilekH.BarneyH. (2006). Strategies to promote data use for instructional improvement: Actions, outcomes, and lessons from three urban districts. American Journal of Education, 112, 496-520.
44.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3-12.
45.
LeithwoodK. A.RiehlC. (2003). What we know about successful school leadership. Philadelphia, PA: Laboratory for Student Success, Temple University.
46.
LeithwoodK.DayC.SammonsP.HarrisA.HopkinsD. (2006). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. Nottingham, UK: National College of School Leadership.
47.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
48.
MandinachE. B. (2012). A perfect time for data use: Using data-driven decision making to inform practice. Educational Psychologist, 47, 71-85.
49.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
50.
MilitelloM.BassL.JacksonK.WangY. (2013). How data are used and misused in schools: Perceptions from teachers and principals. Education Sciences, 3, 98-120.
51.
MilnerH. R. (2010). Start where you are but don’t stay there: Understanding diversity, opportunity gaps, and teaching in today’s classrooms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
52.
MilnerR. (2012a). Beyond a test score: Explaining opportunity gaps in educational practice. Journal of Black Studies, 43, 693-718.
53.
MilnerR. (2012b). But what is urban education?Urban Education, 47, 556-561.
54.
MirandaH. P.MokhtarC.TungR.WardR.FrenchD.McAlisterS.MarshallA. (2014). Opportunity and equity: Enrollment and outcomes of Black and Latino males in Boston Public Schools. Providence, RI: Center for Collaborative Education and Annenberg Institute for School Reform.
55.
MurphyJ. (2003). Re-culturing educational leadership: The ISLLC standards ten years out. Alexandria, VA: National Policy Board for Educational Administration.
56.
MurphyJ.ShipmanN. (1999). The Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium: A standards-based approach to strengthening educational leadership. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13, 205-224.
57.
NogueraP. (2001). Racial politics and the elusive quest for excellence and equity in education. Education and Urban Society, 34, 18-41.
58.
OakesJ. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
59.
OakesJ. (2008). Keeping track: Structuring equality and inequality in an era of accountability. Teachers College Record, 110, 700-712.
60.
OrfieldG. (2013). Housing segregation produces unequal schools: Causes and solutions. In CarterP. L.WelnerK. G. (Eds.), Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give all children an even chance (pp. 40-60). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
61.
ParkV.DalyA. J.GuerraA. W. (2012). Strategic framing: How leaders craft the meaning of data use for equity and learning. Educational Policy, 27, 645-675.
62.
RobinsonV. M.LloydC. A.RoweK. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635-674.
63.
RossJ. A.BergerM.-J. (2009). Equity and leadership: Research-based strategies. School Leadership and Management, 29, 463-476.
64.
RubinH. J.RubinI. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66.
SeidmanI. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
67.
ShapiroJ. P.GrossS. J. (2013). Ethical educational leadership in turbulent times: (Re)solving moral dilemmas (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
68.
ShohoA.MerchantB. M.LuggC. A. (2011). Social justice: Seeking a common language. In EnglishF. W. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of educational leadership: Advances in theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 36-54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69.
SingletonG. E. (2014). Courageous conversations about race: A field guide for achieving equity in schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
70.
SkrlaL.ScheurichJ. J. (Eds.). (2004). Educational equity and accountability: Paradigms, policies, and politics. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
71.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72.
TheoharisG.Causton-TheoharisJ. N. (2008). Oppressors or emancipators: Critical dispositions for preparing inclusive school leaders. Equity & Excellence in Education, 41, 230-246.
73.
TierneyW. G.DilleyP. (2002). Interviewing in education. In GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context & method (pp. 453-471). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74.
WaymanJ. C.StringfieldS. (2006). Technology-supported involvement of entire faculties in examination of student data for instructional improvement. American Journal of Education, 112, 549-571.
