This study uses a North Carolina administrative data set to analyze racial segregation and student achievement in Wake County during race-based and income-based school assignment plans. We find a modest increase in the level of racial segregation in Wake schools during the income-based plan, but compared with other large districts in the state, Wake County remained relatively desegregated. We also find a small increase in reading and math test scores and a narrowing of the Black-White test score gap. Our analysis indicates that the improvement in math scores may be partially due to school composition changes attributable to the income-based assignment plan.
BankstonC.CaldasS. J. (1996). Majority African American schools and social injustice: The influence of de facto segregation on academic achievement. Social Forces, 75, 535-555.
4.
BeckerB. E.LutharS. S. (2002). Social-emotional factors affecting achievement outcomes among disadvantaged students: Closing the achievement gap. Educational Psychologist, 37, 197-214.
5.
BerendsM.PenalozaR. C. (2010). Increasing racial isolation and test score gaps in mathematics: A 30-year perspective. Teachers College Record, 112, 978-1007.
6.
BillingsS. B.DemingD. J.RockoffJ. E. (2012). School segregation, educational attainment and crime: Evidence from the end of busing in Charlotte-Mecklenburg (Working Paper No. 18487). New York, NY: National Bureau of Economic Research.
7.
BogerJ. C. (2002). Education’s perfect storm-racial resegragation, high stakes testing, and school resource inequities: The case of North Carolina. North Carolina Law Review, 81, 1375-1462.
Brown-JeffyS. (2006). The race gap in high school reading achievement: Why school racial composition still matters. Race, Gender & Class, 13, 268-294.
10.
CaldasS. J.BankstonC.III. (1997). Effect of school population socioeconomic status on individual academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 90, 269-277.
11.
ChafeW. H. (1981). Civilities and civil rights: Greensboro, North Carolina, and the Black struggle for freedom. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
ClotfelterC.LaddH. F.VigdorJ.WheelerJ. (2006). High poverty schools and the distribution of teachers and principals. North Carolina Law Review, 85(5), 1345-1380.
14.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. (2005). Who teaches whom? Race and the distribution of novice teachers. Economics of Education Review, 24, 377-392.
15.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L. (2007). Teacher credentials and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects. Economics of Education Review, 26, 673-682.
16.
ColemanJ. S.KellyS. D.MooreJ. A. (1975). Trends in segregation, 1968-1973. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
17.
CondronD. J.RoscignoV. J. (2003). Disparities within: Unequal spending and achievement in an urban school district. Sociology of Education, 76(1), 18-36.
18.
CondronD. J.TopeD.SteidlC. R.FreemanK. J. (2013). Racial segregation and the Black/White achievement gap, 1992 to 2009. The Sociological Quarterly, 54, 130-157.
19.
DobbieW.FryerR. G.Jr. (2011). Are high-quality schools enough to increase achievement among the poor? Evidence from the Harlem Children’s Zone. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(3), 158-187.
20.
FarleyR.RichardsT.WurdockC. (1980). School desegregation and White flight: An investigation of competing models and their discrepant findings. Sociology of Education, 53, 123-139.
21.
FlinspachS.BanksK. (2005). Moving beyond race: Socioeconomic diversity as a race-neutral approach to desegregation in the Wake County Schools. In BogerJ.OrfieldG. (Eds.), School resegregation: Must the South turn back? (pp. 261-280). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
22.
FrankenbergE.LeeC. (2002). Race in American public schools: Rapidly resegregating school districts. Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED468063).
23.
FrankenbergE.LeeC.OrfieldG. (2003). A multiracial society with segregated schools: Are we losing the dream?Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
24.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.RivkinS. G. (2004). Why public schools lose teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 39, 326-354.
25.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.RivkinS. G. (2009). New evidence about Brown v. Board of Education: The complex effects of school racial composition on achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 27, 349-383.
26.
JacobB. A.LudwigJ. (2008). Improving educational outcomes for poor children. In CancianM.DanzigerS. (Eds.), Changing poverty, changing policies (pp. 266-300) New York, NY: Russell Sage.
27.
Jones-SanpeiH. A. (2006). School choice, segregation, and academic outcomes: Educational trajectories under a controlled choice student assignment policy (Doctoral dissertation). The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
28.
KahlenbergR. D. (2007). Economic school integration: An update (The Century Foundation Issue Brief Series). New York, NY: The Century Foundation.
29.
KozolJ. (1991). Savage inequities. New York, NY: Crown.
30.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in US schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3-12.
31.
LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37-62.
32.
LutzB. F. (2011). The end of court-ordered desegregation. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3, 130-168.
McKownC.WeinsteinR. S. (2008). Teacher expectations, classroom context, and the achievement gap. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 235-261.
35.
McMillianM. M.FullerS.HillZ.DuchK.DarityW. (2012, November). School racial composition and student achievement under Wake County’s race- and income-based school assignment policies. Paper presented at the fall meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Baltimore, MD.
36.
MickelsonR. A. (2003). The academic consequences of desegregation and segregation: Evidence from the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. North Carolina Law Review, 81, 1513-1562.
37.
MickelsonR. A.BottiaM. (2009). Integrated education and mathematics outcomes: A synthesis of social science research. North Carolina Law Review, 88, 993-1090.
38.
MurnaneR. J. (2007). Improving the education of children living in poverty. Future of Children, 17, 161-182.
39.
OrfieldG. (1983). Public school desegregation in the United States, 1968-1980. Washington, DC: Joint Center for Political Series.
40.
OrfieldG.LeeC. (2007). Historic reversals, accelerating resegregation, and the need for new integration strategies. Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles, University of California, Los Angeles.
41.
PerryL.McConneyA. (2010). Does the SES of the school matter? An examination of socioeconomic status and student achievement using PISA 2003. The Teachers College Record, 112(4), 7-8.
42.
RansdellS. (2012). There’s still no free lunch: Poverty as a composite of SES predicts school-level reading comprehension. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 908-925.
43.
ReardonS. F.GrewalE.KalogridesD.GreenbergE. (2012). Brown fades: The end of court ordered school desegregation and the resegregation of American public schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31, 876-904.
44.
ReardonS. F.RhodesL. (2011). The effects of socioeconomic school integration plans on racial school desegregation. In FrankenbergE.DeBrayE. (Eds.), Integrating schools in a changing society: New policies and legal options for a multiracial generation (pp. 187-207). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
45.
RivkinS. G. (1994). Residential segregation and school integration. Sociology of Education, 67, 279-292.
46.
RozaM.HillP. T.SclafaniS.SpeakmanS. (2004). How within-district spending inequities help some schools to fail. Brookings Papers on Education Policy, 7, 201-227.
47.
RumbergerR.PalardyG. J. (2005). Does segregation still matter? The impact of student composition on academic achievement in high school. The Teachers College Record, 107, 1999-2045.
48.
ScafidiB.SjoquistD. L.StinebricknerT. R. (2007). Race, poverty, and teacher mobilityEconomics of Education Review, 16, 145-169.
49.
Siegel-HawleyG. (2011). Is class working? Socioeconomic integration in Wake County, North Carolina and Cambridge, Massachusetts. In FrankenbergE.DeBrayE. (Eds.), Looking to the future: Legal and policy options for racially integrated education (pp. 208-222). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
50.
TaeuberK. E.WilsonF. D. (1978). The demographic impact of school desegregation policy (Discussion Papers No. 478). University of Wisconsin–Madison. (ED155289)
ValenciaR. R. (Ed.). (2012). The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
54.
van EwijkR.SleegersP. (2010). Peer ethnicity and achievement: A meta-analysis into the compositional effect. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 21, 237-265.
55.
VigdorJ.NechybaT. (2006). Peer effects in North Carolina public schools. In WoessmannL.PetersonP. E. (Eds.), Schools and the equal opportunity problem (pp. 73-102). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56.
WelchF.LightA. (1987). New evidence on school desegregation. Washington, DC: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
57.
ZimmerR. W.TomaE. F. (2000). Peer effects in private and public schools across countries. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(1), 75-92.
