Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022-6
Connecting With Students Through a Critical,Participatory Curriculum: An Exploration Into a High School History Teacher’s Construction of Teacher–Student Relationships
Standardized testing is a top priority in schools, with conversations around teaching and learning reduced to raising student test scores. Often any other conversations about how schools should serve students are eliminated or pushed to the periphery. The central questions raised here are the following: how are student–teacher relationships constructed in the classroom and how important are those relationships to those students and teachers? My focal teacher enacted a curriculum that was critical and relevant to students’ lives. He considered the curriculum as his primary way of building relationships with students.
AlimH. S.SmithermanG. (2012). Articulate while Black: Barack Obama, language, and race in the U.S. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
Antrop-GonzálezR.De JesúsA. (2006). Toward a theory of critical care in urban small school reform: Examining structures and pedagogies of caring in two Latino community-based schools. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 409-433.
3.
BakhtinM. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
4.
BartoloméL. I. (1994). Beyond the methods fetish: Toward a humanizing pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 64, 173-194.
5.
BoucherM. L. (2016). More than an ally: A successful white teacher who builds solidarity with his African American students. Urban Education, 51, 82-107.
6.
Brown-JeffyS.CooperJ. E. (2011). Toward a conceptual framework of culturally relevant pedagogy: An overview of the conceptual and theoretical literature. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38, 65-84.
7.
CatonM. T. (2012). Black male perspectives on their educational experiences in high school. Urban Education, 47, 1055-1085.
8.
CharmazK. (2010). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In LuttrellW. (Ed.), Qualitative educational research: Readings in reflexive methodology and transformative practice (pp. 183-207). New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
ChisholmJ. S.GodleyA. J. (2011). Learning about language through inquiry-based discussion: Three bidialectal high school students’ talk about dialect variation, identity, and power. Journal of Literacy Research, 43, 430-468.
10.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
11.
DysonA. H. (1993). Social worlds of children learning to write in an urban primary school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
12.
DysonA. H. (2003). The brothers and sisters learn to write: Popular literacies in childhood and school cultures. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
13.
DysonA. H.GenishiC. (2005). On the case: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
14.
Eaker-RichD.Van GalenJ. A. (1996). Introduction. In Eaker-RichD.Van GalenJ. A. (Eds.), Caring in an unjust world: Negotiating borders and barriers in schools (pp. 1-10). Albany: State University of New York Press.
15.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
16.
EricksonF. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119-161). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
17.
FergusonA. (2000). Bad boys: Public schools in the making of Black masculinity. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
18.
FisherM. (2007). Writing in rhythm: Spoken word poetry in urban classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
19.
FosterM. (1997). Black teachers on teaching. New York, NY: New Press.
20.
FreireP.MacedoD. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
21.
GarzaR. (2009). Latino and White high school students’ perceptions of caring behaviors: Are we culturally responsive to our students?Urban Education, 44, 297-321.
22.
GayG. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
23.
GayG. (2014). Culturally responsive teaching principles, practices, and effects. In MilnerH. R.LomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 353-372). New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
GilliganC. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
HayesN. (2008). Teaching matters in early educational practice: The case for a nurturing pedagogy. Early Education and Development, 19, 430-440.
26.
HoffmanD. M. (2009). Reflecting on social emotional learning: A critical perspective on trends in the United States. Review of Educational Research, 79, 533-556.
27.
HowardT. C. (2013). How does it feel to be a problem? Black male students, schools, and learning in enhancing the knowledge base to disrupt deficit frameworks. Review of Research in Education, 37, 54-86.
28.
HowardT. C.MilnerH. R. (2014). Teacher preparation for urban schools. In MilnerH. R.LomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 199-216). New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
HymesD. (1972). Introduction. In CazdenC.HymesD.JohnV. P. (Eds.), Functions of language in the classroom (pp. xi-lvii). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
30.
IrizarryJ. (2007). Ethnic and urban intersections in the classroom: Latino students, hybrid identities, and culturally responsive pedagogy. Multicultural Perspectives, 9(3), 21-28.
31.
KirklandD. E. (2014). Urban literacy learning. In MilnerH. R.LomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 394-412). New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
33.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 465-491.
34.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2001). Crossing over to Canaan: The journey of new teachers in diverse classrooms. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
LeeP. W. (1999). In their own voices: An ethnographic study of low-achieving students within the context of school reform. Urban Education, 34, 214-244.
37.
MartinJ. L.BeeseJ. A. (2017). Talking back at school: Using the literacy classroom as a site for resistance to the school-to-prison pipeline and recognition of students labeled “at-risk.”Urban Education, 52, 1204-1232.
38.
MillerP. J.WangS.SandelT.ChoG. E. (2002). Self-esteem as folk theory: A comparison of European American and Taiwanese mothers’ beliefs. Parenting: Science and Practice, 2, 209-239.
39.
MilnerH. R. (2011). Culturally relevant pedagogy in a diverse urban classroom. Urban Review, 43, 66-89.
40.
MilnerH. R. (2012). But what is urban education?Urban Education, 47, 556-561.
41.
MollL.GonzalesN. (1994). Lessons from research with language-minority children. In CushmanE.KintgenE. R.KrollB. M.RoseM. (Eds.), Literacy: A critical sourcebook (pp. 156-171). Boston, MA: St. Martin’s.
42.
NietoS. (2003). What keeps teachers going?New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
43.
NietoS. (2010). The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
44.
NoddingsN. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45.
NoddingsN. (2005). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
46.
NogueraP. (2003). City schools and the American dream: Reclaiming the promise of public education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
47.
NogueraP. (2008). The trouble with Black boys: And other reflections on race, equity, and the future of public education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
48.
NystrandM. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
49.
ParisD. (2009). “They’re in my culture, they speak the same way”: African American Language in multiethnic high schools. Harvard Educational Review, 79, 428-448.
50.
ParisD. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41, 93-97.
51.
ParisD.AlimH. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84, 85-100.
52.
PrillamanA. R.EakerD. J. (1994). The weave and the weaver: A tapestry begun. In PrillamanA. R.EakerD. J.KendrickD. M. (Eds.), The tapestry of caring: Education as nurturance (pp. 1-11). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
53.
RobertsM. A. (2010). Toward a theory of culturally relevant critical teacher care: African American teachers’ definitions and perceptions of care for African American students. Journal of Moral Education, 39, 449-467.
54.
Rolón-DowR. (2005). Critical care: A color(full) analysis of care narratives in the schooling experiences of Puerto Rican girls. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 77-111.
55.
RosaldoR. (1989). Culture and truth: The remaking of social analysis. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
56.
St. JohnE. P.CadrayJ. P. (2004). Justice and care in post-desegregation urban schools: Rethinking the role of teacher education programs. In Siddle WalkerV.SnareyJ. R. (Eds.), Race-ing moral formation: African American perspectives on care and justice (pp. 93-110). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
57.
SaldañaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
58.
ShevalierR.McKenzieB. A. (2012). Culturally responsive teaching as an ethics- and care-based approach to urban education. Urban Education, 47, 1086-1105.
59.
SzwedJ. F. (1981). The ethnography of literacy. In CushmanE.KintgenE. R.KrollB. M.RoseM. (Eds.), Literacy: A critical sourcebook (pp. 421-429). Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
60.
ValenzuelaA. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: State University of New York Press.
61.
WareF. (2006). Warm demander pedagogy: Culturally responsive teaching that supports a culture of achievement for African American students. Urban Education, 41, 427-456.
