Publicly engaged scholarship (PES) has emerged as a powerful force, yet institutional policies and cultures have often inhibited its acceptance in the academy. This article considers the benefits of PES for higher education as well as the obstacles to its enactment. It identifies the college level as a critical site for change and offers a rubric for institutional change agents to use to assess support for community engagement at the college level and identify avenues for further progress. The authors also grapple with tensions inherent in promoting PES at institutions that have historically served as agents of domination and oppression.
AminzadeR.PescosolidoB. A. (1999). The social worlds of higher education: Handbook for teaching in a new century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
2.
Association of American Colleges & Universities. (2012). A crucible moment: College learning and democracy’s future (A National call to action). Washington, DC: Author.
BattistoniR. M. (2003). Civic engagement across the curriculum: A resource book for service-learning faculty in all disciplines. Providence, RI: Campus Compact.
CampbellJ. (2014). Higher education mediating institutions and habit. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 422-432. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1441
7.
CantorN. (2010). Academic excellence and civic engagement: Constructing a third space for higher education. Retrieved from http://surface.syr.edu/chancellor/1
ClarkW. (2006). Academic charisma and the origins of the research university. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
ColbeckC. L. (1998). Merging in a seamless blend: How faculty integrate teaching and research. Journal of Higher Education, 69, 647-671.
11.
CollinsR. (1994). The credential society: An historical sociology of education and stratification. San Diego, Calif: Academic Press.
12.
CubanL. (1988). A fundamental puzzle of school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 69(5): 341-344.
13.
DanaN. F.EmihovichC. (2004). Actualizing a culture of engaged scholarship in the college of education at the University of Florida. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 10, 29-46.
14.
DoberneckD. M.GlassC. R.SchwietzerJ. (2010). From rhetoric to reality: A typology of publicly engaged scholarship. Journal of higher education outreach and engagement, 14(4).
15.
DolgonC.MitchellT. D.EatmanT. K. (2016). The Cambridge handbook of service learning and community engagement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
EatmanT. K. (2012). The arc of the academic career bends toward publicly engaged scholarship. In GilvinA.RobertsG. M.MartinC. (Eds.), Collaborative futures: Critical reflections on publicly active graduate education (pp. 25-48). Syracuse, NY: Graduate School Press, Syracuse University.
17.
EckelP.HillB.GreenM. F. (1998). En route to transformation. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
18.
EllisonJ.EatmanT. K. (2008). Scholarship in public: Knowledge creation and tenure policy in the engaged university. Syracuse, NY: Imagining America
19.
EvansS. Y. (2009). African Americans and community engagement in higher education: Community service, service-learning, and community-based research. Albany: State University of New York Press.
20.
EwellP. T. (1997). Organizing for learning: A new imperative. Aahe Bulletin, 50(4), 3-6.
21.
EwellP. T. (1998). Achieving high performance: The policy dimension. In TierneyW. G. (Ed.), The responsive university: Restructuring for high performance (pp. 120-161). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
22.
FitzgeraldH. E.BrunsK.SonkaS. T.FurcoA.SwansonL. (2012). The centrality of engagement in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 16(3), 7.
23.
FitzgeraldH. E.BurackC.SeiferS. D. (2010). Handbook of engaged scholarship: Contemporary landscapes, future directions. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
24.
FreemanE. G. S.AloshenD. (2009). Why faculty promotion and tenure matters to community partners. Metropolitan Universities Journal, 20, 87-103.
25.
FurcoA. (2002). Self-assessment rubric for the institutionalization of service-learning in higher education. Berkeley: University of California.
26.
FurcoA.MillerW. (2009). Issues in benchmarking and assessing institutional engagement. New Directions for Higher Education, 2009(147), 47-54.
27.
GilvinA.RobertsG. M.MartinC. (2012). Collaborative futures: Critical reflections on publicly active graduate education. Syracuse, New York: The Graduate School Press, Syracuse University.
28.
GirouxH. A. (2002). Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public sphere. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 425-463.
29.
GurgevichE. A.HymanDrewAlterTheodore R. (2003). Creation of UniScope: A model for rewarding all forms of scholarship. JALN, 7(2).
30.
HudsonE. (2013). Educating for community change: Higher education’s proposed role in community transformation through the federal promise neighborhood policy. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 17, 109-138.
31.
KecskesK. (2006). Engaging departments: Moving faculty culture from private to public, individual to collective focus for the common good. Bolton, MA: Anker Publication.
32.
KezarA. J. (2012). Embracing non-tenure track faculty: Changing campuses for the new faculty majority. New York, NY: Routledge.
33.
KezarA. J. (2014). How colleges change: Understanding, leading, and enacting change. New York, NY: Routledge
34.
KezarA.MaxeyD. (2013). The changing academic workforce. Trusteeship, 21, 15-21.
35.
KuhG. D.WhittE. J. (1988). The invisible tapestry: Culture in American colleges and universities. ASHE-EPIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
36.
LewisE.CantorN. (2016). Our compelling interests: The value of diversity for democracy and a prosperous society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
MorrisA. D. (2015). The scholar denied: W.E.B. Du Bois and the birth of modern sociology. Oakland: University of California Press.
38.
MotenF.HarneyS. (2004). The university and the undercommons: Seven theses. Social Text, 22(2), 101-115.
39.
O’MearaK. A. (2016). Legitimacy, agency, and inequality organizational practices for full participation of community-engaged faculty. In PostM. A.WardE.LongoN. V.SaltmarshJ. A. (Eds.), Publicly engaged scholars: Next generation engagement and the future of higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
40.
O’MearaK.RiceE. (2005). Faculty priorities reconsidered: Rewarding multiple forms of scholarship (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
41.
O’MearaK.EatmanT. K.PetersenS. (2015). Advancing engaged scholarship in promotion and tenure: A roadmap and call for reform. Liberal Education, 101(3).
42.
PostM. A.WardE.LongoN. V.SaltmarshJ. A. (Eds.). (2016). Publicly engaged scholars: Next generation engagement and the future of higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
43.
SaltmarshJ. (2005). The civic promise of service learning. Liberal Education, 91, 50-55.
44.
SaltmarshJ. A.HartleyM. (2011). To serve a larger purpose: Engagement for democracy and the transformation of higher education. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
45.
SaltmarshJ.GelmonS. (2006). Characteristics of an engaged department: Design and assessment. In KecskesK. (Ed.), Engaging departments: Moving faculty culture from private to public, individual to collective focus for the common good (pp. 96–110).
46.
SaltmarshJ.HartleyM.ClaytonP.H. (2009) Democratic Engagement White Paper. Boston, MA: New England Resource Center for Higher Education.
47.
SaltmarshJ.MiddletonM.J. (October, 2015). Creating a culture of community engagement: The view from a college at a research university. Paper presented at the Annual conference of the Coalition of Urban and Metropolitan Universities, Omaha, NE.
48.
SandmannL. R.PlaterW. M. (2009). Leading the engaged institution. New Directions for Higher Education, 2009, 13-24.
49.
SandmannL. R.ThorntonC. H.JaegerA. J. (2009). Institutionalizing community engagement in higher education: The first wave of Carnegie classified institutions. New Directions for Higher Education, 147.
50.
StantonT. K. (2008). New times demand new scholarship: Opportunities and challenges for civic engagement at research universities. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 3(1), 19-42. doi:10.1177/1746197907086716
51.
SturmS.EatmanT.SaltmarshJ.BushA. (2011). Full participation: Building the architecture for diversity and public engagement in higher education (White Paper). Center for Institutional and Social Change: Columbia University Law School.
52.
TierneyW. G. (2008). The impact of culture on organizational decision-making: Theory and practice in higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
53.
TierneyW. G.PerkinsJ. F. (2015). Beyond the Ivory Tower: Academic work in the 21st century. In ShakerG. G. (Ed.), Faculty work and the public good: Philanthropy, engagement, and academic professionalism. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
54.
WarnickC. (2007). Creating a new kind of university: Institutionalizing community-university engagement. Community Literacy Journal, 1(2).
WarrenM. R.ParkS. O.TiekenM. C. (2016). The formation of community-engaged, scholars: A collaborative approach to doctoral training in education research. Harvard Educational Review, 86(2), 233-260,308-309. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1799006321?accountid=13626
57.
WeertsD. J.SandmannL. R. (2008). Building a two-way street: Challenges and opportunities for community engagement at research universities. Review of Higher Education, 21(1), 73-106.
58.
WelchM.SaltmarshJ. (2013). Current practice and infrastructures for campus centers of community engagement. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 17(4), 25-56.
59.
WerginJ. F. (2006). Elements of effective community engagement. Percy StephenL.Zimpher NancyL.JaneBrukhard Mary (Eds.) Creating a New Kind of University. Institutionalizing Community-University Engagement. Bolton: Anker.
60.
WilderC. S. (2013). Ebony and ivy: Race, slavery, and the troubled history of America’s universities (First U.S. ed.). New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.
