This essay reflects on the promise and challenges of community-engaged, critical participatory action research (CPAR) hinged to social policy in times of racialized state violence and massive community resistance. With cautious optimism, we argue for the potential of CPAR to facilitate more just social policy, by enhancing research validity, policy integrity, and organizing capacity. Drawing on a series of CPAR projects, we also raise a series of ethical, political, and power-laden dilemmas we have encountered in this work and offer, with humility, provisional solutions for advancing activist-scholarship linked in struggle with communities under siege.
BirkettM.RussellS. T.CorlissH. L. (2014). Sexual-orientation disparities in school: The mediational role of indicators of victimization in achievement and truancy because of feeling unsafe. American Journal of Public Health, 104, 1124-1128.
6.
CachoL. M. (2012). Social death: Racialized rightlessness and the criminalization of the unprotected. New York: New York University Press.
7.
CahillC.StoudtB.TorreM. E.MatlesA.LopezJ.BelmonteK.RosadoJ. (in process). A blade of grass: Young people, slow violence, and the struggle over social reproduction.
8.
CharltonJ. I. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9.
ChatawayC. (1997). An examination of the constraints on mutual inquiry in a participatory action research project. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 747-765. Cahill
10.
ChatterjeeP.MairaS. (Eds.). (2014). The imperial university: Academic repression and scholarly dissent. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
11.
CherryF.BorshukC. (1998). Social action research and the Commission on Community Interrelations. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 119-142.
12.
ChmielewskiJ. F.BelmonteK.StoudtB.FineM. (2016). Intersectional inquiries with LGBTQ and gender nonconforming youth of color: Participatory research on discipline disparities at the race/gender/sexuality nexus. In SkibaR.MedirattaK.RauschM. K. (Eds.), Inequality in school discipline: Research and practice to reduce disparities (pp. 171-188). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
ChoiB. C.PangT.LinV.PuskaP.ShermanG.GoddardM.ClotteyC. (2005). Can scientists and policy makers work together?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 632-637.
14.
CookeB.KothariU. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny?London, England: Zed Books.
15.
CrossW. E. (2003). Tracing the historical origins of youth delinquency & violence: Myths & realities about Black culture. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 67-82.
16.
Du BoisW. E. B. (1899). The Philadelphia Negro: A social study. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
17.
FabricantM.FineM. (2013). The changing politics of education: Privatization and the dispossessed lives left behind. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
18.
Fals-BordaO.RahmanM. A. (1991). Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action research. New York, NY: Apex Press.
19.
FineM. (2006). Bearing witness: Methods for researching oppression and resistance—A textbook for critical research. Social Justice Research, 19, 83-108.
20.
FineM. (2017). Just research in contentious times: Widening the methodological imagination. New York: TC Press.
21.
FineM.CrossW. E. (2016). Critical race, psychology and social policy: Refusing damage, cataloguing oppression, and documenting desire. In AlvarezA.NevilleH. (Eds.), Contextualizing the costs of racism (pp. 273-294). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22.
FineM.RuglisJ. (2009). Circuits and consequences of dispossession: The racialized realignment of the public sphere for US youth. Transforming Anthropology, 17, 20-33.
23.
FineM.TorreM. E.BoudinK.BowenI.ClarkJ.HyltonD.UpeguiD. (2001). Changing minds: The impact of college in a maximum security prison (Research report). New York: Graduate School and University Center, The City University of New York.
24.
FoxM.FineM. (2014). Our troubling fix on urban adolescents: A New York story. In KellyP.KampeA. (Eds.), A critical youth studies for the 21st century (pp. 379-393). London, England: Brill.
25.
FreireP. (1982). Creating alternative research methods: Learning to do it by doing it. In HallB.GilletteA.TandonR. (Eds.), Creating knowledge: A monopoly (pp. 29-37). New Delhi, India: Society for Participatory Research in Asia.
26.
GordonA. F. (2008). Ghostly matters: Haunting and the sociological imagination. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
27.
GreenhalghT.RussellJ. (2006). Reframing evidence synthesis as rhetorical action in the policy making drama. Healthcare Policy, 1, 34-42.
28.
GuareschiP. A.JovchelovitchS. (2004). Participation, health and the development of community resources in Southern Brazil. Journal of Health Psychology, 9, 311-322.
29.
GuishardM. (2009). The false paths, the endless labors, the turns now this way and now that: Participatory action research, mutual vulnerability, and the politics of inquiry. The Urban Review, 41, 85-105.
30.
HalcliA. (1999). AIDS, anger, and activism: ACT UP as a social movement organization. In FreemanJ.JohnsonV. (Eds.), Waves of protest: Social movements since the sixties (pp. 135-150). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
31.
HardingS. (1994). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity”? In AlcoffL.PotterE. (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 49-82). New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
HarveyD. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23-40.
33.
Hill-CollinsP. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of Black feminist thought. Social Problems, 33(6), 14-32.
hooksb. (2015). Feminist theory: From margin to center (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
IrvineA. (2010). We’ve had three of them: Addressing the invisibility of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and gender nonconforming youths in the juvenile justice system. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 19, 675-701.
37.
JashnaniG.BustamanteP.StoudtB. G. (2017). Dispossession by accumulation: The impacts of discretionary arrests in New York City. Race and Justice, 2153368717742476
38.
KelmanH. C. (1972). The rights of the subject in social research: An analysis in terms of relative power and legitimacy. American Psychologist, 27, 989-1016.
39.
KingdonJ. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives and publics policies (2nd ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins.
40.
KothariU. (2005). Authority and expertise: The professionalisation of international development and the ordering of dissent. Antipode, 37, 425-446.
LykesM. B. (2013). Participatory and action research as a transformative praxis: Responding to humanitarian crises from the margins. American Psychologist, 68, 772-783.
43.
Martín-BaróI. (1994). Writings for a liberation psychology (AronA.CorneS. Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
MasseyS. G.BarrerasR. E. (2013). Introducing “impact validity.”Journal of Social Issues, 69, 615-632.
45.
MatlesA.SandwickT.CahillC.StoudtB. G.LandesS.GeigelJ. (2015). We want community schools! (Fact sheet). New York: Public Science Project and Make the Road New York.
46.
MelamedJ. (2006). The spirit of neoliberalism: From racial liberalism to neoliberal multiculturalism. Social Text, 24(4), 1-24.
47.
NelsonG. (2013). Community psychology and transformative policy change in the neo-liberal era. American Journal of Community Psychology, 52, 211-223.
ParadisE. K. (2000). Feminist and community psychology ethics in research with homeless women. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 839-858.
50.
PatelL. (2014). Countering coloniality in educational research: From ownership to answerability. Educational Studies, 50, 357-377.
51.
PatelL. (2016). Deservingness: Challenging coloniality in education and migration scholarship. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal, 9, 11-21.
52.
PayneE.SmithM. (2012). Rethinking safe schools approaches for LGBTQ students: Changing the questions we ask. Multicultural Perspectives, 14, 187-193.
RittelH. W.WebberM. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155-169.
55.
Sánchez CarmenS. A.Hernández ArellanoD. A.Nava-PerezE. (unpublished). Letter to immigrant rights movement: An intervention in inclusion and assimilation politics.
56.
Serrano-GarcíaI. (2013). Social policy: The tightwire we walk (a commentary). Global Journal of Community Psychology Practice, 4(2), 2-4.
57.
ShinnM. (2007). Waltzing with a monster: Bringing research to bear on public policy. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 215-231.
58.
SmithL. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York, NY: Zed Books.
59.
SmithL. T. (2007). On tricky ground. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research (pp. 113-143). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60.
SpadeD. (2015). Normal life: Administrative violence, critical trans politics, and the limits of law. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
61.
StoudtB. G.CahillC. X. D.BelmonteK.DjokovicS.LopezJ.MatlesA.TorreM. E. (2016). Participatory action research as youth activism. In ConnerJ.RosenS. M. (Eds.), Contemporary youth activism: Advancing social justice in the United States (pp. 327-346). New York, NY: ABC-CLIO.
62.
StoudtB. G.FoxM.FineM. (2012). Contesting privilege with critical participatory action research. Journal of Social Issues, 68, 178-193.
63.
StoudtB. G.TorreM. E. (2014). The Morris justice project: Participatory action research. In SAGE research methods cases. London, England: SAGE. doi:10.4135/978144627305014535358
64.
StoudtB. G.TorreM. E.BartleyP.BracyF.CaldwellH.DownsA.YatesJ. (2015). Participatory action research and policy change. In DuroseC.RichardsonL. (Eds.), Designing public policy for co-production: Theory, practice and change (pp. 125-137). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
65.
StoudtB. G.TorreM. E.BartleyP.BracyF.CaldwellH.DownsA.YatesJ. (in press). Researching at the community-university borderlands: Using public science to study policing in the South Bronx. Education Policy Analysis Archives.
66.
TeoT. (2010). What is epistemological violence in the empirical social sciences?Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 295-303.
67.
TorreM. E. (2005). The alchemy of integrated spaces: Youth participation in research collectives of difference. In WeisL.FineM. (Eds.), Beyond silenced voices (pp. 251-266). Albany: State University of New York Press.
68.
TorreM. E. (2009). Participatory action research and critical race theory: Fueling spaces for nos-otras to research. The Urban Review, 41, 106-120.
TorreM. E.FineM. (2011). A wrinkle in time: Tracing a legacy of public science through community self-surveys and participatory action research. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 106-121.
71.
TorreM. E.FineM.CabanaA.FrostD. (2018). Radical wills (and won’ts): Critical participatory inqueery. In TalburtS. (Ed.), Youth sexualities: Public feelings and contemporary cultural politics (Vol. 2, pp. 169-191 ). Westport, CT: Praeger, 2018.
72.
TorreM. E.FineM.StoudtB. G.FoxM. (2012). Critical participatory action research as public science. In CooperH. (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 171-184). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
73.
TorreM. E.StoudtB. G.ManoffE.FineM. (2018). Critical participatory action research on state violence: Bearing wit(h)ness across fault lines of power, privilege, and dispossession. In DenzinN.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 492-516). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74.
TuckE. (2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79, 409-428.
75.
VizenorG. (2008). Aesthetics of survivance. In VizenorG. (Ed.), Survivance: Narratives of native presence (pp. 1-24). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
76.
WeisL.FineM. (2012). Critical bifocality and circuits of privilege: Expanding critical ethnographic theory and design. Harvard Educational Review, 82, 173-201.
77.
WynterS. (2003). Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation—An argument. CR: The New Centennial Review, 3, 257-337.
78.
Zeller-BerkmanS. (2014). Lineages: A past, present and future of participatory action research. In LeaveyP. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp. 518-532). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
