This case study examines the leadership practices and actions of an urban high school principal who faced many challenges, but worked diligently to improve student achievement and school climate over a 3-year period. Significant improvements were made by using elements of Distributed Leadership, Professional Learning Communities, and Social Justice Leadership. The authors suggest that contextually responsive leadership practices rather than one best practice present better solutions to the complexity in urban school leadership.
AndersonJ. D. (1988). The education of blacks in the South, 1860-1935. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
2.
AndrewsD.LewisM. (2007). Transforming practice from within: The power of the professional learning community. In StollL.LouisK. S. (Eds.),Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas (pp. 132-147). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
3.
AragonA.CulpepperS. A.McKeeM. W.PerkinsM. (2013). Understanding profiles of preservice teachers with different levels of commitment to teaching in urban schools. Urban Education, 49, 543-573.
4.
AsenR.GurkeD.ConnersP.SolomonR.GummE. (2013). Research evidence and school board deliberations lessons from three Wisconsin school districts. Educational Policy, 27, 33-63.
5.
AudS.FoxM. A.KewalRamaniA. (2010). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic groups. National Center for Educational Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010015.pdf
6.
Bell McKenzieK.ChristmanD. E.HernandezF.FierroE.CapperC. A.DantleyM.. . .ScheurichJ. J. (2008). From the field: A proposal for educating leaders for social justice. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 111-138.
7.
BlanchettW. J. (2014). African American students and other students of color in special education. In MilnerR.LomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 271-284). New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
BloomC. M.ErlandsonD. A. (2003). African American women principals in urban schools: Realities, (re)constructions, and resolutions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 339-369.
9.
BurnsJ. M. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
10.
Cambron-McCabeN.McCarthyM. M. (2005). Educating school leaders for social justice. Educational Policy, 19, 201-222.
11.
CarsonJ. B.TeslukP. E.MarroneJ. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1217-1234.
12.
CarspeckenP. F. (1997). Reform and resistance in schools and classrooms: An ethnographic view of the coalition of essential schools. American Anthropologist, 99, 418-419.
13.
CrowG. M.ScribnerS. P. (2014). Professional identities of urban school principals. In MilnerR.LomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 287-304). New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
DancyT. E.HorsfordS. D. (2010). Considering the social context of school and campus communities: The importance of culturally proficient leadership. In HorsfordS. D. (Ed.), New perspectives in educational leadership: Exploring social, political, and community contexts and meaning (Vol. 1, pp. 153-171). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
15.
DrameE. R.PugachM. C. (2010). A HOUSE built on quicksand? Exploring the teacher quality conundrum for secondary special education teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33, 55-69.
16.
DuFourR.EakerR. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
17.
DuFourR. (2003, May). Building a professional learning community. The School Administrator, 60 (5), pp. 13-18.
18.
DuFourR. (2004, May). What is a “professional learning community”?Educational Leadership, 61(8), p. 6.
19.
DuFourR.DuFour, EakerR.ManyT. (2006). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
20.
EisnerE. W. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement educational practice. Old Tappan, NJ: Macmillan.
21.
EngestromY. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43, 960-974.
22.
EricksonF. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In WhittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). Old Tappan, NJ: Macmillan.
23.
FlessaJ. (2009). Urban school principals, deficit frameworks, and implications for leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 19, 334-373.
24.
FratturaE.CapperC. (2007). Leading for social justice: Transforming schools for all learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
25.
GoodenM. (2005). The role of an African American principal in an urban information technology school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 630-650.
26.
GronnP. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423-451.
27.
HargreavesA.FinkD. (2006). Redistributed leadership for sustainable professional learning communities. Journal of School Leadership, 16, 550-565.
28.
HarrisA.LeithwoodK.DayC.SammonsP.HopkinsD. (2007). Distributed leadership and organizational change: Reviewing the evidence. Journal of Educational Change, 8, 337-347.
29.
HatchJ. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany: State University of New York Press.
30.
HeckR. H.HallingerP. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 659-689.
31.
HessF. M. (2008). The new stupid. Educational Leadership, 66(4), 12-17.
32.
HordS. M. (Ed.). (2004). Learning together, leading together: Changing schools through professional learning communities. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
33.
HowardT. C.MilnerH. R.IV. (2014). Teacher preparation for urban schools. In MilnerR.LomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 199-216). New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
HulpiaH.DevosG.RosseelY. (2009). The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teachers’ and teacher leaders’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(3), 291-317.
35.
HulpiaH.DevosG.RosseelY.VlerickP. (2012). Dimensions of distributed leadership and the impact on teachers’ organizational commitment: A study in secondary education. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 1745-1784.
36.
HutchinsE. (1995). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, 265-288.
37.
IrbyD. J. (2013). Net-deepening of school discipline. The Urban Review, 45, 197-219.
38.
Jean-MarieG.NormoreA. H.BrooksJ. S. (2009). Leadership for social justice: Preparing 21st century school leaders for a new social order. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 4(1), 1-31.
39.
KingM. B.NewmannF. M. (2001). Building school capacity through professional development: Conceptual and empirical considerations. International Journal of Educational Management, 15, 86-94.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in US schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3-12.
LoflandJ.LoflandL. H. (1995). Analyzing social settings. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
44.
LomoteyK. (1989). African-American principals: School leadership success. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
45.
LouisK. S.KruseS. D. (1995). Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
46.
LouisK. S.MarksH. (1998). Does professional learning community affect the classroom teachers’ work and student experience in restructured schools?American Journal of Education, 106, 532-575.
47.
LouisK.S.DretzkeB.WahlstromK. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School effectiveness and school improvement, 21(3), 315-336.
48.
LymanL. L.VillaniC. J. (2002). The complexity of poverty: A missing component of educational leadership programs. Journal of School Leadership, 12, 246-280.
49.
MarquesJ. F.McCallC. (2005). The application of interrater reliability as a solidification instrument in a phenomenological study. The Qualitative Report, 10, 438-461.
50.
MascallB.LeithwoodK.StrausT.SacksR. (2008). The relationship between distributed leadership and teachers’ academic optimism. Journal of Educational Administration, 46, 214-228.
51.
MayrowetzD. (2008). Making sense of distributed leadership: Exploring the multiple usages of the concept in the field. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 424-435.
52.
McKenzieK.B.ChristmanD.E.HernandezF.FierroE.CapperC.A.DantleyGonzalezM.L.Cambron-McCabeScheurichJ.J. (2008). From the field: A proposal for educating leaders for social justice. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(1), 111-138.
53.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
54.
MilnerH. R. (2012). But what is urban education?Urban Education, 47, 556-561.
55.
MonroeC. R. (2009). Teachers closing the discipline gap in an urban middle school. Urban Education, 44, 322-347.
56.
MumfordM. D.GustafsonS. B. (2007). Creative thought: Cognition and problem solving in a dynamic system. Creativity Research Handbook, 2, 33-77.
57.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, § 9101, 115 Stat. 1964 (2002).
58.
NorthouseP. G. (2007). Leadership: Theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.
59.
O’ConnorC.MuellerJ.NealA. (2014). Student resilience in urban America. In MilnerR.LomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 75-96). New York, NY: Routledge.
60.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61.
PaulusT. M.WoodsideM.ZieglerM. (2008). Extending the conversation: Qualitative research as dialogic collaborative process. The Qualitative Report, 13(2), 226-243.
PearceC. L.SimsH. P.Jr (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group dynamics: Theory, research, and practice, 6(2), 172-197.
64.
PetersA. L. (2010). Rethinking transformational leadership in schools: The influence of people, place, and process on leadership practice. In Douglass HorsfordS. (Ed.), New perspectives in educational leadership: Exploring social, political, and community contexts and meaning (Vol. 1, pp. 29-46). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
65.
ReedL. (2008). An expansion of a scholar’s social justice perspective: A meeting at the crossroads. Journal of School Leadership, 18(2), 200-223.
66.
ReedL.JohnsonL. T. (2010). Serving LGBT students: Examining the spiritual, religious, and social justice implications for an African American school administrator. The Journal of Negro Education, 79, 390-404.
RichardsonL. (1997). Writing: A method of inquiry. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516-529). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69.
ScanlanM. (2009). Leadership dynamics promoting systemic reform for inclusive service delivery. Journal of School Leadership, 19, 622-660.
70.
ScheurichJ. J. (1998). Highly successful and loving, public elementary schools populated mainly by low-ses children of color core beliefs and cultural characteristics. Urban Education, 33, 451-491.
71.
Seashore LouisK.DretzkeB.WahlstromK. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School effectiveness and school improvement, 21(3), 315-336.
72.
SiwatuK. O. (2011). Preservice teachers’ sense of preparedness and self-efficacy to teach in America’s urban and suburban schools: Does context matter?Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 357-365.
73.
SkrlaL.ScheurichJ. J.GarciaJ.NollyG. (2004). Equity audits: A practical leadership tool for developing equitable and excellent schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 133-161.
74.
SlavinR. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15-21.
75.
SpillaneJ. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
76.
SpillaneJ. P.HalversonR.DiamondJ. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23-28.
77.
StakeR. E. (2005). Quantitative case studies. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443-466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
78.
Swindler BoutteG. S.JohnsonG. L.Jr. (2014). Community and family involvement in urban schools. In MilnerR.LomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 167-187). New York, NY: Routledge.
79.
TeemantA. (2013). A mixed-methods investigation of instructional coaching for teachers of diverse learners. Urban Education, 49, 574-604.
80.
TheoharisG. T. (2007). Social justice educational leaders and resistance: Toward a theory of social justice leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43, 221-258.
81.
TheoharisG.O’TooleJ. (2011). Leading Inclusive ELL Social Justice Leadership for English Language Learners. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(4), 646-688.
82.
TillmanL. C. (2004). African American principals and the legacy of Brown. Review of Research in Education, 28, 101-146.
83.
TooleJ. C.LouisK. S. (2002). The role of professional learning communities in international education. In Leithwood KennethA.HallingerP., (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 245-279). The Netherlands: Springer.
84.
TrybusM. (2007). Understanding scientifically based research: A mandate or decision tool?Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 73(4), 5-8.
85.
WeathersJ. M. (2011). Teacher community in urban elementary schools: The role of leadership and bureaucratic accountability. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19(3). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/887
86.
White-SmithK. A. (2012). Beyond instructional leadership: The lived experiences of principals in successful urban schools. Journal of School Leadership, 22(1), 6-25.
87.
White-SmithK. A.WhiteM. A. (2009). High school reform implementation principals’ perceptions on their leadership role. Urban Education, 44, 259-279.
88.
WileyS. D. (2001). Contextual effects on student achievement: School leadership and professional community. Journal of Educational Change, 2, 1-33.
89.
WolcottH. F. (1995). The art of fieldwork. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
90.
WolcottH. F. (1999). Ethnography: A way of seeing. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
91.
YinR. K. (2011). Applications of case study research. London, England: Sage.
92.
YoungsP.KingM. B. (2002). Principal leadership for professional development to build school capacity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 643-670.
