This study examined the ability of Transformative Professional Development (TPD) to transform science teacher quality and associated impact on science achievement, including particular focus on English Language Learners (ELL). TPD was implemented in a large, low-performing, urban district in the southwest with predominantly Latino ELL populations. Findings revealed TPD enabled significant growth in teacher quality and participants in TPD experienced gains in student science achievement on state assessments. Most importantly, ELL student achievement in science Grades 4 to 8 was improved. Challenges to implementation of TPD are discussed along with implications for future research.
AbediJ.HofstetterC.LordC. (2004). Assessment accommodations for English language learners: Implications for policy-based empirical research. Review of Educational Research, 74, 1-28.
2.
AndersonR. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 1-12.
3.
AnyonJ. (2001). Inner cities, affluent suburbs, and unequal educational opportunity. In BanksJ.BanksC. (Eds.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (4th ed., pp. 85-102). New York, NY: John Wiley.
4.
AtwaterM. M. (1994). Research on cultural diversity in the classroom. In. GabelD. L. (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 558-576). New York, NY: Macmillan.
5.
BanilowerE. R.HeckD. J.WeissI. R. (2007). Can professional development make the vision of the standards a reality? The impact of the National Science Foundation’s local systemic change through teacher enhancement initiative. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 375-395.
6.
BanksJ. A. (1999). An introduction to multicultural education (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
BartonA. C. (2001). Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 899-917.
8.
BlumenfeldP.FishmanB. J.KrajcikJ.MarxR. W. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35, 149-164.
9.
BransfordJ. D.BrownA. L.CockingR. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10.
BryanL. A.AtwaterM. M. (2002). Teacher beliefs and cultural models: A challenge for science teacher preparation programs. Science Education, 86, 821-839.
11.
Calabrese BartonA.LeeO. (2006). NARST equity and ethics committee: A call to action. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 875-878.
12.
ChamotA.O’MalleyM. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13.
Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and empowering America for brighter economic future. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11463.html
14.
CzerniakC. M.BeltyukovaS.StrubleJ.HaneyJ. J.LumpeA. T. (2005). Do you see what I see? The relationship between a professional development model and student achievement. In YagerR. E. (Ed.), Exemplary science in grades 5-8: Standards-based success stories (pp. 13-43). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
15.
DesimoneL. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualization and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181-199.
16.
DuranR. P. (2008). Assessing English-language learners’ achievement. Review of Research in Education, 32, 292-327.
17.
FraddS. H.LeeO.SutmanF. X.SaxtonM. K. (2002). Materials development promoting science inquiry with English language learners: A case study. Bilingual Research Journal, 25, 479-501.
18.
Fraser-AbderP.AtwaterM.LeeO. (2006). Research in urban science education: An essential journey. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 599-606.
19.
GibbonsB. A. (2003). Supporting elementary science education for English learners: A constructivist evaluation instrument. The Journal of Educational Research, 96, 371-380.
20.
GlesneC. (2006). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Education.
21.
GoldstonM. J.NicholsS. (2009). Visualizing culturally relevant science pedagogy through photonarratives of Black middle school teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 179-198.
22.
GonzalezN.MollL.AmantiC. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
JeanpierreB.OberhauserK.FreemanC. (2005). Characteristics of professional development that affect change in secondary science teachers’ practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 668-690.
25.
Jennings-BolshakovaV.JohnsonC. C.CzerniakC. M. (2011). “It depends on what science teacher you got”: Urban science self-efficacy from teacher and student voices. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6, 961-997.
26.
JohnsonC. C. (2009). An examination of effective practice: Elimination of achievement gaps in science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(3), 287-306.
27.
JohnsonC. C. (2010). Making the case for school-based systemic reform in science education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(3), 279-282.
28.
JohnsonC. C. (2011). The road to culturally relevant science: Exploring how teachers navigate change in pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 170-198.
29.
JohnsonC. C. (2013). Educational turbulence: The influence of macro and micro policy on science education reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 693-715.
30.
JohnsonC. C.FargoJ. D. (2010). Urban school reform through transformative professional development: Impact on teacher change and student learning of science. Urban Education, 45, 4-29.
31.
JohnsonC. C.FargoJ. D.KahleJ. B. (2010). The cumulative and residual impact of a systemic reform program on teacher change and student learning of science. School Science and Mathematics, 110, 144-159.
32.
JohnsonC. C.KahleJ. B.FargoJ. D. (2007). A study of the effect of sustained, whole-school professional development on student achievement in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 775-786.
33.
JohnsonC. C.MarxS. (2009). Transformative professional development: A model for urban science education reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 113-134.
34.
KeysC. W.BryanL. A. (2000). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 631-645.
35.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 465-491.
36.
LaughterJ. C.AdamsA. D. (2012). Culturally relevant science teaching in middle school. Urban Education, 47, 1106-1134.
37.
LeeO. (2002). Science inquiry for elementary students from diverse backgrounds. In SecadaW. G. (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 23-69). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
38.
LeeO. (2004). Teacher change in beliefs and practices in science and literacy instruction with English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 65-93.
39.
LeeO. (2005). Science education with English language learners: Synthesis and research agenda. Review of Educational Research, 75, 491-530.
40.
LeeO.BuxtonC.LewisS.LeRoyK. (2005). Science inquiry and student diversity: Enhanced abilities and continuing difficulties after an instructional intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 607-636.
41.
LeeO.KrajcikJ. (2012). Large-scale interventions in science education for diverse student groups in varied educational settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 271-280.
42.
LeeO.LuykxA. (2005). Dilemmas in scaling up innovations in elementary science instruction with nonmainstream students. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 411-438.
43.
LeeS.ButlerM. B.TippinsD. J. (2007). A case study of an early childhood teachers’ perspective working with English language learners. Multicultural Education, 15(1), 43-49.
44.
LipmanP. (1995). “Bringing out the best in them”: The contribution of culturally relevant teachers to educational reform. Theory Into Practice, 34, 202-208.
45.
Loucks-HorsleyS.HewsonP. W.LoveN.StilesK. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of mathematics and science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
McCandlessE.RossiR.DohertyS. (1997). Are Limited English Proficiency (LEP) students being taught by teachers with LEP training?Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Government Printing Office.
McLarenP. (2003). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
49.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
50.
PellegrinoJ.ChudowskyN.GlaserR. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
51.
PenuelW. R.FishmanB.YamaguchiR.GallagherL. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 921-958.
52.
RodriguezA.KitchenR. S. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing prospective mathematics and science teachers to teach for diversity: Promising strategies for transformative action. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
SleeterC. E. (2012). Confronting the marginalization of culturally responsive pedagogy. Urban Education, 47, 562-584.
55.
Solano-FloresG.LiM. (2008). Examining the dependability of academic achievement measures for English-language learners. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33, 135-144.
56.
StoddartT.PinalA.LatzkeM.CanadayD. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 664-687.
57.
WrightJ. C.WrightC. S. (2000). A commentary on the profound changes envisioned by the national science standards. Teachers College Record, 100(1), 122-143.
