This article presents 7 years of qualitative research into the emerging understandings of a population of 456 beginning 7 to 12 urban teachers who supplied 130 participants who were enrolled in a total of 26 MSEd English Language Arts courses over 7 years. These were interviewed while teaching in urban schools focused primarily on testing and accountability systems, and their class writings were used to present seven of their voices in this study. The study investigates participant engagement in two theoretical frameworks emphasized in the courses: first, the neoliberal ideology of testing and accountability; second, the transactional tradition of aesthetic education. The study finds that education students need not passively acquiesce to neoliberal reforms, but can reclaim a culturally critical stance in their teaching.
AndersonP. M.RubanoG. (1991). Enhancing aesthetic reading and response. Theory & Research into Practice (TRIP) series. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
2.
ApplebeeA. N. (1993). Literature in the secondary school: Studies of Curriculum and instruction in the United States. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
3.
BerlinerD.BiddleB. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud and the attack on America’s public schools. New York, NY: Basic Books.
4.
BogdanR. C.BiklenS. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
BritzmanD. P. (1986). Cultural myths in the making of a teacher: Biography and social structure in teacher education. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 442-456.
6.
BrunerJ. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BrunerJ. (1997). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
CalderheadJ.RobsonM. (1991). Images of teaching: Students teachers’ early conceptions of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(1), 1-8.
CostiganA. T. (2004, February). Finding a name for what they want: A study of New York City’s Teaching Fellows. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal, 20(2), 129-143.
11.
CostiganA. T. (2005, Spring). Choosing to stay, choosing to leave: The New York City Teaching Fellows after two years. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(2), 125-142.
12.
CostiganA. T. (2008a, Spring). Canaries in the coal mine: Urban rookies learning to teach language arts in “high priority” schools. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(2), 85-103.
13.
CostiganA. T. (2008b). Teaching authentic English language arts and test-driven era. New Year, NY: Taylor and Francis. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
14.
CostiganA. T.CroccoM. S. (2004). Learning to teach in an age of accountability. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
CroccoM. S.CostiganA. T. (2006). High-stakes teaching: What’s at stake for teachers (and students) in the age of accountability. The New Educator, 2, 1-13.
16.
CroccoM. S.CostiganA. T. (2007, November). The narrowing of curriculum and pedagogy: Urban educators speak out. Urban Education, 42, 512-535.
17.
DeweyJ. (1900/2001). Chapter II: School and the life of the child. The school and society. New York, NY: Dover Publications.
18.
DeweyJ. (1938/1977). Experience and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
19.
DicksonR.CostiganA. (2011, January). Emerging practice for new teachers: Creating possibilities for “aesthetic” readings. English Education, 43(2), 145-170.
20.
EliotT. S. (1922/1980). Hamlet and his problems. The sacred wood: Essays on poetry and criticism. New York, NY: Methuen.
21.
ElyM.AnzulM.FriedmanT.GarnerD.SteinmetzA. M. (1991). Doing qualitative research: Circles within circles. New York, NY: Falmer.
22.
FleischerC.FoxD. (2004, January). English Education in the time of “No Child Left Behind.”English Education, 36(2), 99-100.
23.
FoucaultM. (1979, March14). Lecture cited in Lemke, 2002, “The birth of bio-politics”: Michael Foucault’s lecture at the College de France on neo-liberal governmenality. Economy and Society, 30, 198.
24.
FriedmanT. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Straus & Giroux.
GabbardD. A. (2003). Chapter 3: Education IS Enforcement!: The centrality of compulsory schooling in market societies. In SaltmanK. J.GabbardD. A. (Eds.), Education as enforcement: The militarization and corporatization of schools (pp. 60-71). New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
GabbardD. A. (2008). Knowledge and power in the global economy: The effects of school reform in a neoliberal/neoconservative age, second edition. New York, NY: Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.
28.
GaughanJ. (2001). Reinventing English: Teaching in the contact zone. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
29.
GlaserB. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
30.
GreyL. (2011). Chapter seven: Governing Identity through neoliberal education initiatives: “Get[ing] schooled” in the marketplace. In KovacsP. E. (Ed.) The gates foundation and the future of U.S. “Public” schools (pp. 126-144.). New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
GreeneM. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts and social change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
32.
GreeneM. (2001). Variations on a blue guitar: The Lincoln Center Institute Lectures on Aesthetic Education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
33.
HarveyD. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University.
34.
HillD.MacrineS.GabbardD. (Eds.). (2008). Capitalist education: Globalization and the politics of inequity. New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
HurshD. W. (2007, September). Assessing No Child Left Behind and the rise of neoliberal educational policies. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 493-518.
36.
HurshD. W. (2008a). High-stakes testing and the decline of teaching and learning: The real crisis in education. New York, NY: Rowman-Littlefield.
37.
HurshD. W. (2008b). The rise and potential fall of neoliberalism. In HillD.GabbardD.MacrineS. (Eds.). Neoliberalism, education and the politics of inequality (pp. xx-xxi). New York, NY: Routledge.
38.
KaufmanD.Moore JohnsonS.KardosS. M.LiuEd.PeskeH. G. (2002, March2). “Lost at sea”: New teachers’ experiences with curriculum and assessment. Teachers College Record, 104, 273-300.
39.
KellyG. A. (1963). A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
40.
KennedyM. (2005). Inside teaching: How classroom life undermines reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
KincaidJ. (2000). Girl. In KincaidJ. (Ed.), At the bottom of the river. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
42.
KochK. (1973). Rose, where did you get that red? Teaching great poetry to children. New York, NY: Random House.
43.
LemkeT. (2002, Fall). “The birth of bio-politics”: Michel Foucault’s lecture at the College de France on neo-liberal governmenality, Economy and Society, 30, 190-207.
44.
LortieD. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago
45.
LightfootS. L. (1983). The good high school. New York, NY: Basic Books.
46.
MayherJ. S. (1990). Uncommonsense: Theoretical practice in language education. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
47.
National Commission on Excellence in Education [NCEE]. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/index.html
RavitchD. (2000). Left back: A century of failed school reforms. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
52.
RavitchD.MarisA. V. (Eds.). (1995). Learning from the past: What history teaches us about school reform. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
53.
RexL. A.NelsonM. C. (2004). How teachers’ professional identities position high-stakes test preparation in their classrooms. Teachers College Record106, 1288-1331.
54.
RigsbyL. C.DeMulderE. K. (2003, November18). Teachers voices interpreting standards: Compromising teachers autonomy or raising expectations and performances. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 11(3). Retrieved from http://www.epaa.asu.edu/epaa/vlln44
55.
RosenblattL. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
56.
RosenblattL. M. (1983). Reading as exploration (3rd ed.). New York, NY: MLA.
57.
RossE. W. (2008). Chapter 35: Social Studies education. In GabbardD. (Ed.), Knowledge and power in the global economy: The effects of school reform in a neoliberal/neoconservative age, second edition. New York, NY: Erlbaum.
58.
SaltmanK. J.GabbardD. A. (Eds.). (2003). Education as enforcement: The militarization and corporatization of schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
59.
ShorI. (1992). Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
60.
SleeterC. E. (2008). Teaching for democracy in an age of corporatocracy. Teachers College Record, 110(1), 139-159. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org.
61.
SmagorinskyP.GibsonN.BickmoreS. T.MooreC. P.CookS. (2004, April). Praxis shock: Making the transition from a student-centered university program to the corporate climate of schools. English Education, 36, 214-245.
62.
SmagorinskyP.LaklyA.JohnsonT. S. (2002, April). Acquiescence, accommodation, and resistance in learning to teach within a prescribed curriculum. English Education, 34, 187-213.
63.
SmithF. (2004). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read, sixth edition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
64.
TaubmanP. (2009). Teaching by numbers: Deconstructing the discourse of standards and accountability in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
65.
TomlinsonC. A.ImbeauM. (2010). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
66.
U.S. Congress. (2001). Elementary and Secondary Education Act: No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Washington, DC: Author.
67.
WilliamsW. C. (1985). Selected poems. New York, NY: New Directions
68.
ZeichnerB.TabachnikR. (1981, May-June). Are the effects of university teacher education “washed out” by school experience. Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 7-11.
69.
ZeichnerK. M.TabachnikB. R.DensmoreK. (1987). Individual, institutional, and cultural influences on the development of teachers’ craft knowledge. In CalderheadJ. (Ed.), Exploring teachers’ thinking (pp. 21-59). London, UK: Cassell.
