In recent years No Child Left Behind has provided new labels to supposedly high- and low-performing schools and has identified large numbers of schools as low performing. Are school-to-school differences in the quality of instruction offered as great as the public is led to believe? Using the disciplined inquiry typology of Newman, Marks, and Gamoran, we examine whether variation in observable indicators of school quality correspond to real differences in instruction between schools. Consistent with the large body of research on school effects we find very modest school-level variation in the prevalence of disciplined inquiry.
AlvermannD. E. (2002). Effective literacy instruction for adolescents. Journal of Literacy Research, 34, 189-208.
2.
ApplebeeA. N. (1996). Curriculum as conversation: Transforming traditions of teaching and learning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
ApplebeeA. N.LangerJ. A.NystrandM.GamoranA. (2003). Discussion based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom Instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 685-730.
4.
BidwellC. E. (1965). The school as a formal organization. In MarchJ. G.(Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 972-1018). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
5.
BlankR. K.PorterA.SmithsonS. (2001). New Tools for Analyzing Teaching, Curriculum and Standards in Mathematics and Science (Report from Survey of Enacted Curriculum Project; National Science Foundation REC98-03080). Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
6.
BormanG.DowlingM. (2010). Schools and inequality: A multilevel analysis of Coleman’s equality of educational opportunity data. Teachers College Record, 112(5), 1-2.
7.
BrykA. S.LeeV. E.HollandP. B. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
ChristensenT. C.BarrettL. F.Bliss-MoreauE.LeboK.KaschubC. (2003). A practical guide to experience-sampling procedures. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 53-78.
9.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. (2005). Who teaches whom? Race and the distribution of novice teachers. Economics of Education Review, 24, 377-392.
10.
ClotfelterC.T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L.AliagaR. A. (2004). Do school accountability systems make it more difficult for low performing schools to attract and retain high quality teachers?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23, 251-271.
11.
ColemanJ. S. (1990). Equality and achievement in education. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
12.
ColemanJ. S.CampbellE. Q.HobsonC. J.McPartlandJ.MoodA. M.WeinfallF. D.YorkR. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
13.
Consortium on Chicago School Research. (2004). Public use data set 2001 survey of students and teachers user’s manual. Chicago, IL: Author. Retrieved from http://ccsr.uchicago.edu
14.
CraneJoyce. (2008, October9). Westford Academy a Blue Ribbon school. The Boston Globe. Retrieved from www.bostonglobe.com.
15.
de ViseDaniel. (2008, September10). Blue Ribbon Awarded to 10 Schools In D.C. Area. Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com.
16.
DowneyD. B.von HippelP. T.BrohB. (2004). Are schools the great equalizer? Cognitive inequality during the summer months and the school year. American Sociological Review, 69, 613-635.
17.
DowneyD. B.von HippelP. T.HughesM. (2008). Are “failing” schools really failing? Using seasonal comparison to evaluate school effectiveness. Sociology of Education, 81, 242-270.
18.
EinhornErin. (2007, December21). New York State Flunking 61 City Schools. New York Daily. Retrieved from www.nydailynews.com.
19.
EntwisleD. R.AlexanderK. L.OlsonL. S. (1997). Children, schools and inequality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
20.
FrankenbergE. (2006). The segregation of American teachers. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
21.
FusarelliL. D. (2004). The potential impact of the No Child Left Behind Act on equity and diversity in American education. Educational Policy, 18(1), 71-94.
22.
GamoranA.AndersonC. W.QuirozP. A.SecadaW. G.WilliamsT.AshmannS. (2003). Transforming teaching in math and science: How schools and districts can support change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
23.
GamoranA.CarbonaroW. (2002). High school English: A national portrait. High School Journal, 86, 1-13.
24.
GoldhaberD.AnthonyE. (2007). Can teacher quality be effectively assessed? National board certification as a signal of effective teaching. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 134-150.
25.
GrossmanP. (1990). The making of a teacher. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
26.
HairJ. F.Jr.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L.BlackW. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
27.
HamiltonL. S.StecherB. M.MarshJ.McCombsJ. S.RobynA.RussellJ.. . . BarneyH. (2007). Implementing standards-based accountability under No Child Left Behind: Responses of superintendents, principals, and teachers in three states. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
28.
HoffD. (2009, January7). Schools struggling to meet key goal on accountability. Education Week, 28(16), 1, 14-15.
29.
JarvisC. B.MackenzieS. B.PodsakoffP. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 199-218.
30.
JencksC.SmithM.AclandH.BaneM. J.CohenD.GintisH.. . . MichelsonS. (1972). Inequality. New York, NY: Basic Books.
31.
KaneT. J.StaigerD. O. (2002). Volatility in school test scores: Implications for test-based accountability systems (Brookings papers on education policy). Washington D.C: Brookings Institution Press.
32.
KeevesJ. P.HungiN.AfrassT. (2005). Measuring value added effects across schools: Should schools be compared in performance?Studies In Educational Evaluation, 31, 247-266.
33.
KellyS.GamoranA. (2003). Tracking, instruction, and unequal literacy in secondary school English. In HallinanM. T.GamoranA.KubitschekW.LovelessT. (Eds.), Stability and Change in American Education: Structure, Processes and Outcomes. Clinton Corners, NY: Eliot Werner Publications.
34.
KellyS.MonczunskiL. (2007). Overcoming the volatility in school-Level gain scores: A new approach to identifying value added with cross sectional data. Educational Researcher, 36, 279-287.
35.
KellyS.TurnerJ. (2009). Rethinking the Effects of Classroom Activity Structure on the Engagement of Low-achieving Students. Teachers College Record, 111, 1665-1692.
36.
KellyS. (2010). The Prevalence of Developmental Instruction in Public and Catholic Schools. Teachers College Record, 112, 2405-2440.
37.
KimJ. S.SundermanG. L. (2005). Measuring academic proficiency under the No Child Left Behind Act: Implications for educational equity. Educational Researcher,34(8), 3-13.
38.
LaddH.ZelliA. (2002). School-based accountability in North Carolina: The responses of school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 494-529.
39.
LangerJ. A. (1995). Literature and learning to think. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 10, 207-226.
40.
LinnR. L.HaugC. (2002). Stability of school building accountability scores and gains. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,24, 29-36.
41.
McNeilM. (2009, September). Tight leash likely on turnaround aid: Radical steps proposed as price for Title I grants. Education Week, 29(2), 1, 20-21.
42.
MehanH. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
44.
MeyerR. (2002, April2). Value-added indicators: Do they make an important difference? Evidence from the Milwaukee public schools (Wisconsin Center for Education Research). Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
45.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). National Household Education Surveys Program of 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
46.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). Digest of education statistics, 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
47.
NewmannF. M.MarksH. M.GamoranA. (1996). Authentic pedagogy and student performance. American Journal of Education, 104, 280-312.
48.
NystrandM. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
49.
OlsonL. (2006, September20). As AYP bar rises, more schools fail. Education Week, 26(4), 1, 20-21, 23.
50.
OrfieldG.LeeC. (2007). Historic reversals, accelerating resegregation, and the need for new integration strategies (Report). Los Angeles, CA: UCLA, Civil Rights Project.
51.
QuillianL. (2002). Why Is Black-White residential segregation so persistent? Evidence on three theories from migration data. Social Science Research, 31, 197-229.
52.
RaubenheimerJ. E. (2004). An item selection procedure to maximize scale reliability and validity. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30(4), 59-64.
53.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
54.
RaudenbushS. W.RowanB.CheongY. F. (1993). The pursuit of higher-order instructional goals in secondary schools: Class, teacher, and school influences. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 523-553.
55.
ResnickD. P.ResnickL. B. (1977). The nature of literacy: An historical exploration. In MinamiM.KennedyB. P. (Eds.), Language issues in literacy and bilingual/multicultural education (pp. 135-150). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Review.
56.
SandersW. (1998). Value-added assessment. School Administrator, 11(3), 24-27.
57.
ScheerensJ.BoskerR. J. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
58.
ShernoffD. J.CsikszentmihalyiM.SchneiderB.ShernoffE. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 158-176.
59.
SmithsonJ.PorterA. C. (1994). Measuring classroom practice: Lessons learned from efforts to describe the enacted curriculum. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
60.
TekweC. D.CarterR. L.MaC.AlignaJ.LucasM. E.RothJ. (2004). An empirical comparison of statistical models for value-added assessment of school performance. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 11-36.
61.
VaznisJames. (2009, July2). 30 Failing Schools may Face Takeover. The Boston Globe. Retrieved from www.bostonglobe.com.
62.
WalbergH. (2009). School choice: The findings. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
63.
WanbaughMichael. 2006, August28. Four Years Later, Fewer Schools Make Adequate Yearly Progress. South Bend Tribune. Retrieved from www.southbendtribune.com.
64.
WatersJim. 2009, August07. If parents could choose, bureaucrats would lose. The Times-Tribune. Retrieved from http://www.edchoice.org.
65.
WeickK. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-19.
