Framed within the growing population of English language learners (ELLs) in urban schools, this study examined the learning experiences of bilingual Latino/a students who were taught to serve as on-site interpreters at their inner-city K-8 school in California. Participants in the Young Interpreters Program had significantly higher scores in Reading Comprehension and Paraphrasing at posttest in comparison with their classmates. In addition, interview data revealed students’ increased efficacy in their abilities as interpreters and students. The use of an asset approach to educating ELLs in urban schools is discussed.
AngelelliC.EnrightK.ValdésG. (2002). Developing the talents and abilities of linguistically gifted bilingual students: Guidelines for developing curriculum at the high school level (RM02156). Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
2.
AnzaldúaG. (1987). Borderlands/La Frontera. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute.
3.
BeersK. (2003). When kids can’t read: What teachers can do. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
4.
BensonP.LeffertN.ScalesP.BlythD. (1998). Beyond the “village” rhetoric: Creating healthy communities for children and adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 2, 138-159.
5.
BorreroN. E. (2007). Promoting cultural and linguistic diversity in American public schools: Fostering the assets of bilingual adolescents. International Journal of Diversity in Organizations, Communities, and Nations, 7, 195-203.
6.
BorreroN. E.BirdS. (2009). Closing the achievement gap: How to pinpoint student strengths to differentiate instruction and help your striving readers succeed. New York, NY: Scholastic.
7.
BorreroN. E.YehC. J. (2010). Ecological language learning among ethnic minority youth. Educational Researcher, 39, 571-581.
8.
BurielR.PerezW.DeMentL.ChavezD.MoranV. (1998). The relationship of language brokering to academic performance, biculturalism and self-efficacy among Latino/a adolescents. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 20, 283-297.
9.
CalderónM. E. (2007). Teaching reading to English language learners, Grades 6-12: A framework for improving achievement in the content areas. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
10.
California Department of Education. (2009). Language census data. Sacramento: Author.
11.
California Department of Education Standards and Assessment Division. (2008). California standard tests (CSTs) technical report spring 2007 administration(Educational Testing Services Contract no. 5417). Retrieved from http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/sr/documents/csttechrpt07.pdf
12.
CaryS. (2007). Working with English language learners (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
13.
ChaoR. K. (2002). The role of children’s linguistic brokering among immigrant Chinese and Mexican families. “Families of color: Developmental issues in contemporary sociohistorical contexts,” Symposium conducted at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, MN.
14.
CollierV. P. (1995). Acquiring a second language for school: Vol. 1, No. 4. Directions in language and education (ERIC Document No. ED394301). Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
15.
CrawfordJ.KrashenS. (2007). English learners in American classrooms. New York, NY: Scholastic.
16.
CumminsJ. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 19, 222-251.
17.
CumminsJ. (2005). A proposal for action: Strategies for recognizing heritage language competence as a learning resource with the mainstream classroom. Modern Language Journal, 89, 582-592.
18.
Darling-HammondL. (2007). The flat earth and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. Educational Researcher, 36, 318-334.
19.
DeMentT.BurielR. (1999). Children as cultural brokers: Recollections of college students. Paper presented at the SPSSI Conference on Immigrants and Immigration, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
20.
DeshlerD.SchumakerJ. B. (1988). An instructional model for teaching students how to learn. In GradenJ. L.ZinsJ. E.CurtisM. J. (Eds.), Alternative educational delivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for all students (pp. 391-411). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
21.
DeweyJ. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
22.
Diaz-LazaroC. M. (2002). The effects of language brokering on perceptions of family authority structure, problem solving abilities, and parental locus of control in Latino/a adolescents and their parents (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). State University of New York at Buffalo.
23.
FreedmanD. J.BrookhartS. M.LoadmanW. (1999). Realities of teaching in racially/ethnically diverse schools: Feedback from entry-level teachers. Urban Education, 34, 89-114.
24.
FreemanD.FreemanY. (2007). English language learners: The essential guide. New York, NY: Scholastic.
25.
FreemanY.FreemanD. (1998). ESL/EFL teaching: Principles for success. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
26.
GarcíaE. (2005). Teaching and learning in two languages: Bilingualism and schooling in the United States. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
27.
GibsonM.GándaraP.KoyamaJ. (2004). School connections: U.S. Mexican youth, peers, and school achievement. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
28.
GiffordB.ValdésG. (2006). The linguistic isolation of Hispanic students in California’s public schools: The challenge of reintegration. In BallA. F. (Ed.), With more deliberate speed: Achieving equity and excellence in education—Realizing the full potential of Brown v. Board of Education (pp. 125-154). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
29.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
30.
GlesneC. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. Menlo Park, CA: Longman.
31.
GonzalezN.MollL. D.Floyd-TenneryM.RiveraA.RendonP.AmantiC. (1993). Funds of knowledge for teaching in Latino households. Urban Education, 29, 443-447.
32.
GottleibM. (2006). Assessing English language learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
33.
GumperzJ. J. (1971). Language in social groups. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
34.
HalgunsethL. (2003). Language brokering: Positive developmental outcomes. In ColemanM.GanongL. (Eds.), Points and counterpoints controversial relationship and family issues in the 21st century: An anthology (pp. 154-157). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
35.
KohlerA.LazarínM. (2007). The Hispanic education in the United States. National Council of La Raza, Statistical Brief, 8(1), 7-8.
36.
KozolJ. (2005). The shame of the nation: The restoration of apartheid schooling in America. New York, NY: Corwin.
37.
KrashenS. (1982). Principles and practices in second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
38.
KubotaR. (2005). Second language teaching for multilingualism and multiculturalism: Politics, challenges, and possibilities. In HoosainR.SaliliF. (Eds.), Language in multicultural education (pp. 31-55). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
39.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
40.
LoveJ. A. (2003). Language brokering, autonomy, parent–child bonding, and depression. Paper presented at the 2003 Conference of the Society on the Research of Child Development, Miami, FL.
41.
McQuillanJ.TseL. (1995). Child language brokering in linguistic minority communities: Effects on cultural interaction, cognition and literacy. Language and Education, 9, 195-215.
42.
MerriamS. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
43.
MollL. C.AmantiC.NeffD.GonzálezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132-141.
44.
MontagueM. (2003). Solve it! A practical approach to teaching mathematical problem-solving skills. Reston, VA: Exceptional Innovations.
45.
MoralesA.HansonW. E. (2005). Language brokering: An integrative review of the literature. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 27, 471-503.
46.
NesselD. D.GrahamJ. M. (2007). Thinking strategies for student achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
47.
NgJ. (1998). From kitchen to classroom: Reflections of a language broker. Voices from the Middle, 6(1), 38-40.
48.
NietoS. (2002). Language, culture, and teaching: Critical perspectives for a new century. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49.
OlsenL. (1997). Made in America: Immigrant students in our public schools. New York, NY: New Press.
50.
OrellanaM. F. (2003). Responsibilities of children in Latino/a immigrant homes. New Directions for Youth Development, 100, 25-39.
51.
OrellanaM. F.DornerL.PulidoL. (2003). Assessing assets: Immigrant youth’s work as family translators or “para-phrasers.”Social Problems, 50, 505-524.
52.
OvandoC. J.CombsM. C.CollierV. P. (2006). Bilingual & ESL classrooms: Teaching in multicultural contexts (4th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
53.
PadillaA. (2006). Second language learning: Issues in research and teaching. In AlexanderP. A.PintrichP. R.WinneP. H. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 571-591). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
54.
PadillaA.LindholmJ.ChenA.DuranR.HakutaK.LambertW.TuckerG. (1991). The English only movement: Myths, reality and implications for psychology. American Psychologist, 6(2), 120-131.
55.
PortesA.RumbautR. G. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
56.
PressleyM.HildenK. (2006). Cognitive strategies: Production deficiencies and successful strategy instruction everywhere. In KuhnD.SieglerR. (Eds.), DamonW.LernerR. (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 2: Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
57.
SantiagoS. (2003). Language brokering: A personal experience. In ColemanM.GanongL. (Eds.), Points and counterpoints controversial relationship and family issues in the 21st century: An anthology (pp. 160-161). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
58.
SchumakerJ. B.DentonP. H.DeshlerD. D. (1984). The paraphrasing strategy. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
59.
ShannonS. M. (1990). English in the barrio: The quality of contact among immigrant children. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 12, 256-276.
60.
Statistical Package for Social Sciences. (2006). Version 14.0 for Windows [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Author.
61.
StraussA.CorbinJ. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
62.
Suárez-OrozcoC.Suárez-OrozcoM. (2001). Children of immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63.
ThomasW. P.CollierV. P. (2002). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students’ long-term academic achievement. Santa Cruz: University of California, Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence.
64.
TseL. (1995). Language brokering among Latino/a adolescents: Prevalence, attitudes, and school performance. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 17, 180-193.
65.
TseL. (1996). Who decides? The effects of language brokering on home-school communication. Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 16, 225-234.
66.
Umaña-TaylorA. J. (2003). Language brokering as a stressor for immigrant children and their families. In ColemanM.GanongL. (Eds.), Points and counterpoints controversial relationship and family issues in the 21st century: An anthology (pp. 157-159). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
67.
ValdésG. (2001). Learning and not learning English: Latino/a students in American schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
68.
ValdésG. (2003). Expanding definitions of giftedness: Young interpreters of immigrant background. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
69.
ValenzuelaA. (1999). Gender roles and settlement activities among children and their immigrant families. American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 720-742.
70.
WalinchowskiM. (2001). Language brokering: Laying the foundation for success and bilingualism. R. Lara-Alecio (Chair), Research in bilingual education, Symposium conducted at the Annual Educational Research Exchange, College Station, TX.
71.
WeisskirchR. S.Alva-AlatorreS. (2002). Language brokering and the acculturation of Latino/a students. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 24, 369-378.
