In this article the author draws on the concept of positioning to examine how language is used during one particular fifth-grade writing lesson to construct both the lesson and the participants. The author’s analysis of the classroom interactions makes visible how participants colluded to position one student in particular, Larnell, as a “bad, bad boy,” and worked to ultimately exclude him from the classroom community. The study has implications for understanding the social construction of school failure and resistance, particularly as they relate to the overrepresentation of black males in special education and exclusionary disciplinary settings.
ArtilesA. E.KozleskiE. (2007). Beyond convictions: Interrogating culture, history and power in inclusive education. Language Arts, 84(4), 351-358.
2.
BloomeD.TheodorouE. (1988). Analyzing teacher-student and student-student discourse. In GreenJ.ParkerJ. O. (Eds.), Multiple perspective analysis of classroom discourse (pp. 217-248). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
3.
CazdenC. (1988/2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, UK: Heinemann.
4.
CollinsJ. (1998). Strategies for struggling writers. New York, NY: Guilford.
5.
CollinsK. (2011). “My mom says I’m really creative!”: dis/Ability, resistance, and positioning in multimodal instructional contexts. Language Arts, 88(6).
6.
CollinsK. M. (2003). Ability profiling and school failure: One child’s struggle to be seen as competent. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
DaviesB. (1993). Shards of glass: Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
8.
DaviesB.HarréR. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 20(1), 43-63.
9.
DeweyJ. (1990). The child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1902)
10.
EdelskyC. (1993). Gender and interaction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
FoucaultM. (1983). The subject and power. In DreyfusH.RabinowP. (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208-226). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
GeeJ. P. (1990/1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.
13.
GelbS. A. (1995). The beast in man: Degeneration and mental retardation, 1900-1920. Mental Retardation, 33, 1-9.
14.
GoffmanI. (1967/1981). Interaction ritual: Essays in face to face behavior. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
15.
HarryB.AndersonM. (1999). The social construction of high-incidence disabilities: The effect on African American males. In PoliteV. C.DavisJ. E. (Eds.), African American males in school and society: Policies and practices for effective education (pp. 32-50). New York: Teacher College Press.
16.
HymesD. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
LukeA. (1995). Text and discourse in education: An introduction to critical discourse analysis. In AppleM. (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 21, pp. 3-48). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
18.
McDermottR. P. (1993). The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In ChaiklinS.LaveJ. (Eds.), Understanding practice (pp. 269-305). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
19.
McDermottR. P.VarenneH. (1995). Culture as disability. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 26(3), 324-348.
20.
MitchellJ. C. (1984). Typicality and the case study. In EllenR. F., Ethnographic research: A guide to general conduct (pp. 238-241). New York: Academic Press.
21.
RabinowP. (Ed.). (1984). The Foucault reader. New York: Random House.
22.
RexL. A. (2000). Judy constructs a genuine question: A case for interactional inclusion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(2), 315-333.
23.
RexL. A. (2001). The remaking of a high school reader. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(3), 288-314.
24.
RexL. A.McEachenD. (1999). “If anything is odd, inappropriate, confusing, or boring, it’s probably important”: The emergence of inclusive academic literacy through English classroom discussion practices. Research in the Teaching of English, 34(1), 65-129.
25.
RuizN. (1995a). The social construction of ability and disability: I. Profile types of Latino children identified as language disabled. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28(8), 476-490.
26.
RuizN. (1995b). The social construction of ability and disability: II. Optimal and at-risk lessons in a bilingual special education classroom. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28(8), 491-502.
27.
VarenneH.McDermottR. (1998). Successful failure: The school America builds. Boulder, CO: Westview.
28.
WorthamS. (2004). From good student to outcast: The emergence of a classroom identity. ETHOS, 32(2), 164-187.
