The last two decades have seen dramatic change in U.S. schooling as a response to high-stakes accountability and market-based reform movements. Critics cite a number of unfortunate consequences of these movements, especially for students in urban schools. This article explores the troubling ironies related to one strategy for survival in this environment: constructing an image of a “good school.” Drawing from an ethnographic study of an urban middle school, the author argues that the administration developed and promoted an image of a good school in the public sphere but this image did not reflect the experiences of students and teachers. The author develops this argument by drawing out four ironies that resulted from image-building in a climate of high-stakes accountability and market-driven reform.
Apple, M.W. ( 2001). Comparing neo-liberal projects and inequality in education . Comparative Education, 37, 409-423.
3.
Banks, J.A. ( 1997). Multicultural education: Characteristics and goals. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (3rd ed., pp. 3-31). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
Booher-Jennings, J. ( 2006). Rationing education in an era of accountability. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 756-761.
5.
Brookfield, S. ( 2005). Learning democratic reason: The adult education project of Jürgen Habermas. Teachers College Record, 107, 1127-1168.
6.
Bryk, A.S., Easton, J.Q., Kerbow, D., Rollow, S.G., & Sebring, P.B. ( 1993). A view from the elementary schools: The state of reform in Chicago. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
7.
Christman, J.B. ( 2002). Baker Middle School case study. Philadelphia : Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. ( 1992). Communities for teacher research: Fringe or forefront ? American Journal of Education, 100, 298-324.
10.
Cullen, J.B., & Reback, R. ( 2006). Tinkering toward accolades: School gaming under a performance accountability system. In T. J. Gronberg & D. W. Jansen (Eds.), Improving school accountability: Check ups or choice, Volume 14 (Advances in Applied Microeconomics, pp. 1-34). Amsterdam : Elsevier Science.
11.
Darling-Hammond, L. ( 2007). Race, inequality, and educational accountability: The irony of No Child Left Behind. Race Ethnicity and Education , 10, 245-260.
12.
Diamond, J.B., & Spillane, J.P. (2004). High-stakes accountability in urban elementary schools: Challenging or reproducing inequality? Teachers College Record, 106, 1145-1176.
13.
Foley, D.E. ( 1990). Learning capitalist culture: Deep in the heart of Tejas . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
14.
Haberman, M. ( 1991). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 290-294.
15.
Habermas, J. ( 1985). The theory of communicative action, vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
16.
Habermas, J. ( 1987). The theory of communicative action, vol. 2: Life world and system: A critique of functionalist reason (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
17.
Lubienski, C. ( 2005). Public schools in marketized environments: Shifting incentives and unintended consequences of competition-based educational reforms. American Journal of Education, 111, 464-486.
18.
Maxwell, J.A. ( 2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
19.
Morrow, A.M., & Torres, C.A. ( 2002). Reading Freire and Habermas: Critical pedagogy and transformative social change. New York: Teachers College Press.
20.
Niesz, T. ( 2006). Beneath the surface: Teacher subjectivities and the appropriation of critical pedagogies. Equity & Excellence in Education , 39, 335-344.
21.
Niesz, T. ( 2008). Professional movements, local appropriations, and the limits of educational critique: The cultural production of mixed messages at an urban middle school. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 21, 327-346.
22.
Perna, L.W., & Thomas, S.L. ( 2009). Barriers to college opportunity: The unintended consequences of state-mandated testing. Educational Policy, 23, 451-479.
23.
Rubin, H.J., & Rubin, I.S. ( 2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Whitty, G., Power, S., & Halpin, D. ( 1998). Devolution and choice in education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
