Using statistical data collected during a 30-year period, the article reports on the significant movement of females into all of the line administrative positions in the largest school districts in the country (by student population) since the passage of Title IX with one notable exception, that of superintendent. The position of superintendent remains, as it was in 1972, overwhelmingly male. In terms of the promise of Title IX to redress gender inequity in school administration, it would appear to have been successful save for that one persistent, resistant, powerful top spot.
Banks, C. A. M. (1995). Gender and race as factors in educational leadership and administration. In J. S. Banks (Ed.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 65-80). New York: Macmillan.
2.
Bell, C. S. (1995). If I weren’t involved with schools I might be a radical. In D. M. Dunlap & P. A. Schmuck (Eds.), Women leaders in education (pp. 288-312). New York: State University of New York Press.
3.
Bell, C. S., & Chase, S. E. (1994). How search consultants talk about female superintendents. School Administrator, 51, 36-38.
4.
Bjork, L. (2000). Introduction: Women in the superintendency. Educational Administrative Quarterly, 36, 5-17.
5.
Blount, J. (1998). Destined to rule the schools. Women and the superintendency, 1873-1995. Albany: State University of New York Press.
6.
Brunner, C. C. (1999). Power, gender, and superintendent selection. In C. C. Brunner (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 63-78). Albany: State University of New York Press.
7.
Brunner, C. C. (2000a). Principles of power. Women superintendents and the riddle of the heart. Albany: State University of New York Press.
8.
Brunner, C. C. (2000b). Unsettled moments in settled discourse: Women superintendents’ experiences of inequality. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 76-116.
9.
Chase, S. E. (1995). Ambiguous empowerment: The work narratives of women school superintendents. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
10.
Chase, S. E., & Bell, C. S. (1990). Ideology, discourse, and gender: How gatekeepers talk about women school superintendents. Social Problems, 37(2), 163-177.
11.
Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.
12.
Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Johnson, B. T. (1992). Gender and leadership style among school principals: A meta-analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28, 76-102.
13.
Edson, S. K. (1987). Voices from the present: Tracking the female administrative aspirant. Journal of Educational Equity and Leadership, 74(4), 261-277.
14.
Fischel, A., & Pottker, J. (1977). National politics and sex discrimination in education. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
15.
Frasher, J. M., & Frasher, R. S. (1979). Educational administration: A female profession. Educational Administration Quarterly, 15, 2-13.
16.
Grogan, M. (1996). Voices of women aspiring to the superintendency. Albany: State University of New York Press.
17.
Grogan, M. (2000). Laying the groundwork for a reconceptualization of the superintendency from feminist postmodern perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 117-142.
18.
Grogan, M., & Henry, M. (1995). Women candidates for the superintendency: Board perspectives. In B. Irby & G. Brown (Eds.), Women as school executives: Voices and visions (pp. 164-175). Austin: Texas Council for Women School Executives.
19.
Gross, N., & Trask, A. E. (1976). The sex factor and the management of schools. New York: John Wiley.
20.
Hansot, E., & Tyack, D. (1981). The dream deferred: A golden age for women in school administration. Stanford, CA: Institute for Research on Educational Finance and Governance.
21.
Hemphill, J., Griffiths, D., & Frederiksen, H. (1962). Administrative performance and personality. New York: Teachers College Press.
22.
Hines, V., & Grobman, H. (1956, March). The weaker sex is losing out. School Board Journal, 132, 100-100, 102-102.
23.
Irby, B., & Brown, G. (1995, April). Constructing a feminist-inclusive theory of leadership. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual conference, San Francisco.
24.
Jones, E. H., & Montenegro, X. P. (1982). Recent trends in the representation of women and minorities in school administration and problems in documentation. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
25.
Kamler, E., & Shakeshaft, C. (1999). The role of search consultants in the career paths of women superintendents. In C. C. Brunner (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 51-62). Albany: State University of New York Press.
26.
Marshall, C. (1993). Gender and race issues in administration. In C. Marshall (Ed.), The new politics of race and gender: The 1992 yearbook of the Politics of Education Association (pp. 1-39). London: Falmer.
27.
Marshall, C., & Mitchell, B. (1989, March). Women’s careers as a critique of the administration culture. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, San Francisco.
28.
Marshall, C., Patterson, J. A., Rogers, D. L., & Steele, J. R. (1996). Caring as career. An alternative perspective for educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 271-294.
29.
McCarthy, M., & Zent, A. (1981). School administrators: 1980 profile. Planning & Changing, 12(3), 145-161.
30.
McFadden, A., & Smith, P. (2003, October). Tripping at the tripping point. Why female superintendents might not change our schools. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association research on women annual conference, Knoxville, TN.
31.
McGrath, S. T. (1992). Here come the women!Educational Leadership, 49(5), 62-65.
32.
Mertz, N. T. (1991). Females in school administration: Making sense of the numbers. Planning & Changing, 22(1), 34-45.
33.
Mertz, N. T. (2000, November). Contextualizing the position of assistant principal. Paper presented at the University Council for Educational Administration, annual meeting, Albuquerque, NM.
34.
Mertz, N. T., & McNeely, S. R. (1988). What’s happening to school administration. Planning and Changing, 19(3), 166-177.
35.
Mertz, N. T., & McNeely, S. R. (1998). Women on the job: A study of female high school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(2), 165-195.
36.
Morsink, H. M. (1970). Leader behavior of men and women principals. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 54, 80-87.
37.
National Education Association. (1973). 26th biennial salary survey of professional personnel 1972-1973. Washington, DC: Author.
38.
Pounder, D. G. (1990, October). Educational megatrends and increased leadership in schools. Paper presented at the University Council for Educational Administration annual meeting, Pittsburgh, PA.
39.
Shakeshaft, C. (1987). Women in educational administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40.
Shakeshaft, C. (1989). The gender gap in research in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25, 324-337.
41.
Shakeshaft, C. (1999). The struggle to create a more gender-inclusive profession. In J. Murphy & K. L. Seashore-Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 99-118). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42.
Skrla, L., Reyes, P., & Scheurich, J. J. (2000). Sexism, silence and solutions: Women superintendents speak up and speak out. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 44-75.
43.
Tallerico, M. (1999a). Accessing the superintendency: The unwritten rules. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
Tallerico, M. (1999b). Women and the superintendency: What do we really know? In C. C. Brunner (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 29-48). Albany: State University of New York Press.
45.
Tallerico, M. (2000). Gaining access to the superintendency: Headhunting, gender, and color. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 18-43.
46.
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. (1972). 20 U.S.C. Section 1861, pp. 373-375.
47.
Tyack, D., & Hansot, E. (1982). Managers of virtue: Public school leadership in America, 1820-1980. New York: Basic Books.
48.
Valverde, L. (1980). Promotion socialization: The informal process in large urban districts and its adverse affect on nonwhites and women. Journal of Educational Equity and Leadership, 1(1), 36-46.
49.
Wiles, K., & Grobman, H. G. (1955, October). Principals as leaders. Nation’s Schools, 56, 75-77.
50.
Yeakey, C. C., Johnston, G. S., & Adkison, J. A. (1986). In pursuit of equity: A review of research on minorities and women in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22, 110-149.
