Parents face varying degrees of difficulty with getting involved in their children’s schools. Using data from a study of parent members of a community organization and structuration theory, I examined how and why parents encountered resistance to their attempts to be more involved and to advocate for their children. This work can broaden our conception of barriers to parental involvement and serve as an alert to parent advocates, parents of children of color, and parents of children in special education, as they tend to experience the most challenges. I hope that it will also inspire educators to reconsider their actions within this system and be more courageous in their own advocacy for children.
AsanteM. K. (1990). Kemet, Afrocentricity and knowledge. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.
2.
BaconJ. K.Causton-TheoharisJ. (2013). “It should be teamwork”: A critical investigation of school practices and parent advocacy in special education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17, 682-699.
3.
BeardK. S.BrownK. M. (2008). “Trusting” schools to meet the academic needs of African-American students? Suburban mothers’ perspectives. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 21, 471-485.
4.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
5.
DigeserP. (1992). The fourth face of power. The Journal of Politics, 54, 977-1007.
6.
EpsteinJ. L. (2013). Ready or not? Preparing future educators for school, family, and community partnerships. Teaching Education, 24, 115-118.
7.
EslingerJ. C. (2014). Navigating between a rock and a hard place: Lessons from an urban school teacher. Education and Urban Society, 46, 209-233.
8.
FoucaultM.(1994a). The ethics of the concern for self as a practice of freedom (BeckerH.Fornet-BetancourtR.Gomez-MullerA., Interviewers; and AranovP.McGrawthD., Trans.). In RainbowP. (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 281-301). New York, NY: The New Press. (Reprinted from Foucault Live: Interviews 1961-1984, by Lotringer, Ed., 1989, New York, NY: Autonomedia)
9.
FoucaultM. (1994b). Sex, power, and the politics of identity (GallagherB.WilsonA., Interviewers; and HurleyR.et al, Trans.). In RainbowP. (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 163-173). New York, NY: The New Press. (Reprinted from The Advocate, 400, pp. 26-30 and 58)
10.
GannonS.DaviesB. (2007). Postmodern, poststructural, and critical theories. In Hesse-BiberS. N. (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 71-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11.
GiddensA. (1993). New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretative sociologies (2nd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
GossA. C. (2015). Toward a village consciousness: Organizing in the African American cultural tradition. Journal of Black Studies, 46, 797–816.
13.
JeffersonA. (2015). Examining barriers to equity: School policies and practices prohibiting interaction of families and schools. The Urban Review, 47, 67-83.
14.
KershawT. (2003). The Black studies paradigm: The making of scholar activists. In ConyersJ. L. (Ed.), Afrocentricity and the academy: Essays on theory and practice (pp. 27-36). Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Company.
15.
KimY. (2009). Minority parental involvement and school barriers: Moving the focus away from deficiencies of parents. Educational Research Review, 4, 80-102.
16.
LyonsH. Z.BikeD. H.OjedaL.JohnsonA.RosalesR.FloresL. Y. (2013). Qualitative research as social justice practice with culturally diverse populations. Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology, 5(2), 10-25.
17.
MurrayK. W.Finigan-CarrN.JonesV.Copeland-LinderN.HaynieD. L.ChengT. L. (2014). Barriers and facilitators to school-based parent involvement for parents of urban public middle school students. SAGE Open, 4, 1-12. doi:10.1177/2158244014558030
18.
OakesJ.RogersJ. (2006). Learning power: Organizing for education and justice. New York, NY: Teachers College.
19.
PhillipsE. (2008). When parents aren’t enough: External advocacy in special education. The Yale Law Journal, 117, 1802-1853.
20.
PstrossM.RodriguezA.KnopfR. C.ParisC. M. (2016). Empowering Latino parents to transform the education of their children. Education and Urban Society, 48, 650-671.
21.
RudestamK. E.NewtonR. R. (2007). Surviving Your dissertation: A comprehensive guide to content and process (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
SchreiberL. (2000). Overcoming methodological elitism: Afrocentrism as a prototypical paradigm for intercultural research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24, 651-671.
23.
ShillingC. (1991). Gender inequalities and educational differentiation. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 12, 23-44.
24.
ShillingC. (1992). Reconceptualising structure and agency in the sociology of education: Structuration theory and schooling. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 13, 69-87.
25.
StacerM. J.PerrucciR. (2013). Parental involvement with children at school, home, and community. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 34, 340-354.
26.
St PierreE. A. (2000). Poststructural feminism in education: An overview. International journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13, 477-515.
27.
TillmanL. C. (2002). Culturally sensitive research approaches: An African-American perspective. Educational Researcher, 31(9), 3-12.
28.
TrainorA. A. (2010). Educators’ expectations of parent participation: The role of cultural and social capital. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 12(2), 33-50.
29.
TrainorA. A.BalA. (2014). Development and preliminary analysis of a rubric for culturally responsive research. The Journal of Special Education, 47, 203-216.
30.
TurnerD. W. (2010). Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The Qualitative Report, 15, 754-760.
