Betrabet, S.M. , Pillay, K.P.R., and Iyengar , R.L.N., Structural Properties of Cotton Fibers. Part II: Birefringence and Structural Reversals in Relation to Mechanical Properties, Textile Res. J.33, 720-727 (1963).
2.
Brown, H.M., Correlation of Yam Strength with Fiber Strength Measured at Different Gage Lengths, Textile Res. J.24, 251-260 (1954).
3.
Grant, J.N., and Morlier, O.W., Relation of Specific Strength of Cotton Fibers to Fiber Length and Testing Method, Textile Res. J.18, 481-487 (1948).
4.
Hertel, L.K. , FiberStrength as a Function of Fiber Length and Gauge Length, Textile Res. J.27, 571-578 (1957).
5.
Lord, E., "Manual of Cotton Spinning—The Characteristics of Raw Cotton ," The Textile Institute, Butterworths, Manchester, England, 1961, pp. 301-303.
6.
Lord, E., Raw Cotton Fiber Properties: Scientific Assessment, Textilt, Wkly.59 (2), 451-457, (1959).
7.
Neelakantan, P., The IdealCotton-Fiber Strength and its Relation to Ooserved Strength, Maturity and Fineness, Textile Res. J.47, 178-181 (1977).
8.
Neelakantan, P., Reply to Comments, Textile Res. J.48, 432 (1978).
9.
Pillay, K.P.R.Fiber Strength at Finite Gauge Length of Raw and Mercerized Cotton. Study of Bundles, in "Proc. of 7th Tech. Conf., SITRA," Coimbatore, India, 1965, pp. 15-30.
10.
Rajagopal, A. , Studies on the Effect of Swelling and Decrystallizing Treatments on the Strength-Length Gradient of Cotton, Master's thesis, University of Bombay, 1973.
11.
Verschraege, L., Fransen, T., and Raes, G., Comments on: "The Ideal Cottdn Fiber Strength and its Relation to Observed Strength, Maturity, and Fineness," Textile Res. J.48, 431-432 (1978).
12.
Wakeham, H. , and Spicer, N., The Strength andWeakness of Cotton Fibers, Textile Res. J.21, 187-194 (1951).